List Mgmt. COLLINGWOOD Trade and F/A Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here me out guys…Mitchell v Hopper

Girl Why Dont We Have Both GIF
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Once again you’re working on the assumption that Cox will be more than depth next year. It’s unlikely that we play him, Cameron, McStay, Checkers and AJ in the same team. From those players Cox is the likely out, so you’d be basing it solely on replacing Cameron down the road, and it’s unlikely that a player in the cusp moving for more opportunity will want to wait that long to replace the incumbent ruck.

Cameron vs Cox as number 1 ruck imo Cox wins.

As fwd come 2nd ruck then it's Cameron.
 
He’s cooked.
I’m certain there’s nothing in it other than a journo putting our name for a headline
“Collingwood being alerted” isn’t us making a move.

Stay away from him.
Mitchell that is
Yeah, I’m in the lets not get sucked into topping up with a 29 year old midfielder because we think we are a…………..29 year old midfielder away from winning a flag.
Let’s just build the foundations for sustainable success, not a repeat of 2018/2019 and then fall in a hole.
I want 1-3 flags in as many years as would every Pies supporter!!
 
Last edited:
Once again you’re working on the assumption that Cox will be more than depth next year. It’s unlikely that we play him, Cameron, McStay, Checkers and AJ in the same team. From those players Cox is the likely out, so you’d be basing it solely on replacing Cameron down the road, and it’s unlikely that a player in the cusp moving for more opportunity will want to wait that long to replace the incumbent ruck.
What if McStay is in the backline though
 
What if McStay is in the backline though

What does the chasing of Frampton say about the likelihood of McStay being recruited to play KPD?

I think you need to take a step back to take in the bigger picture.
 
What if McStay is in the backline though
Why would we be recruiting Frampton if the intent is to play McStay in defence? I think it’s time to let that one go.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Why would we be recruiting Frampton if the intent is to play McStay in defence? I think it’s time to let that one go.
Howe is nearly finished and Murphy is one concussion away from being finished. Frampton is not proven.
 
In terms of needs, do we need another young kpd if we recruit Frampton. Frampton, Dean, MacMahon and maybe Kelly is a fair few developing ones. You'd take a best available one, but not another speculative one.
Frampton, Dean, McMahon are speculative although I hope are all pushing hard for best 22 that is the best possible outcome. If we do trade Grundy and have pick 13 and 14 you would think a developing key forward would be good especially with the hesitation we all share about McStay and Kreuger kicking more that 30 goals in a season. And yes McStay might help everyone around him kick more but you would hope he can beat his best of 29 goals in a season.

Also every time I hear or read about the McStay deal it is 650 not 600...
 
I know your “go to” is to lose it when anyone considers letting go of Grundy but maybe have a deeper read of what I said without the rage goggles on
No rage, just unconvincing that your master plan hinges on acquiring Taranto (a 50/50 at best), McStay, and 3 (more like 2) fringe players.
 
Cameron vs Cox as number 1 ruck imo Cox wins.

As fwd come 2nd ruck then it's Cameron.
Agree My learnings from not having Grundy in the side is that Cox is better than Cameron at the ruck contests. Cameron and say McStay would not be a viable option imo. Unless we had the mids to shark the opposition's taps... Which we don't.
 
Mitchell would come in and immediately become a top clearance player (only behind Adams and Grundy this season) and is 8th in the comp in contested possessions. He's also a solid enough tackler.

I wouldn't want him on big coin, but as a back-up to making a play for Taranto/Hopper/Dunkley it makes sense. Much better fit than Crouch
 
Last edited:
No rage, just unconvincing that your master plan hinges on acquiring Taranto (a 50/50 at best), McStay, and 3 (more like 2) fringe players.

What master plan?

Those are the players linked to us and all I said was that if getting all them (as well as re-signing De Geoy) is the result of/possible because of letting go of Grundy, then I’m ok with it
 
What master plan?

Those are the players linked to us and all I said was that if getting all them (as well as re-signing De Geoy) is the result of/possible because of letting go of Grundy, then I’m ok with it
It's a fairly big if, and is entirely dependent on Brodie giving the ok to any move.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top