Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One can only shake their head in disbelief when you hear the negative comments about Hill. He's exactly what we needI’m all for it.
GWS wanted an early second rounder last time from Essendon. But given GWS cap issues, the fact he is out of contract and his unfortunate health issues, he should cost bugger all now. Probably just one of our thirds.
IMO it’s still blatantly obvious we still lack a speedy crumber in our forward line. There are very few in the draft and most would still be much more speculative than Bobby.
Freo will have to cough up significantly more then their first for Jackson. Pick 14 will only for a part of that trade, so no, you’re wrong on that.The funny part about this post, despite your tone, the suggestion that Grundy will get us the pick that Jackson will.
Being a premiership player doesn’t automatically make you better. Take that out of consideration for his value.Jackson is a pick 3 (from memory) premiership player and young.
Grundy isn’t coming off a knee reco.Grundy is a former AA coming off a knee reco and hasn't seen his best in 3 years.
They’ll use pick 14 and probably their future first and have something coming back their way. It’s not as simple as “they need a top 10 pick” because that’s not always feasible.Free will need to get a top 10 if not 5 pick to get Jackson. They will be trying to use their first round pick to get higher.
I’m not sold on Hill as a player in general yet, because he just doesn’t have the runs on the board, but it’s hard to argue that recruiting him is a bad idea. He has all the traits, and will be a low cost trade. Low risk, high reward seems a no brainer to me that we should be grabbing him.One can only shake their head in disbelief when you hear the negative comments about Hill. He's exactly what we need
To me, he's been played out of position. Fast skillful indigenous kids can be pigeon holed as deep forwards, but he needs to play higher up the ground to utilise his ability to run with and use the footyHill certainly has a lot of potential, I don't see why it can't be unlocked with us
I must be one of the few that thinks Bobby Hill be good for us.
My comment about a tall forward is for the future which will will needI'd always go best available through the draft and recruit for needs, which is how I think we'll go. Even though it means overpaying for someone like McStay - that's better than overpaying and thus burning draft picks by only aiming for a particular type at the draft.
I'm pretty bullish about a tall combo involving 3 of McStay, Kreuger, Johnson, Mihocek and Henry. I think we need Ginni and McCreery to take the next step and get front and centre more, but am happy with the way the forward line is likely to shape up next year.
Hawthorn apparently just want him out. They'll pay some of his salary and take a third. I was as surprised as anyone when I read that.Maybe it’s a 3rd to get him across if you’re willing to pay the entire contract rather than Hawthorn chipping in.
Elliott is a great forward. Except he lacks about 20cm required to play the role he does. He plays well but he and we'd be better if we had a marking forward who was taller.He will be great. Often Jamie Elliott is the only one in our forward line with speed and he looks dangerous. Having Hill will be like having peak Stephenson.
And yes, peak Stephenson was his first year in the system
So why are we wondering whether to sign him? Just sign him up. He'll cost us a ... third? El cheapo for that production rate. Kelly averages about half that in the VFL so I'd take Billy any day of the week. If we have a better defender in the AFL, imagine what that unlocks for Moore. Still got Dean coming through as well with McMahon developing nicely.Frampton had 21 disposals and 10 marks today.
Imagine a season with Madge and the Brown Bros. BigFooty would die.If he was with us he'd be right up there with Blair, Madge and the Brown Bros as BF canon fodder . He's not that good and marking isn't a strength, all he does is look good for a big man. This will come back and bite freo right on the ass
Correction. Peak Stephenson was in his second year before being busted for gambling. He was on target for a 40-50 goal season (including finals) at that point.He will be great. Often Jamie Elliott is the only one in our forward line with speed and he looks dangerous. Having Hill will be like having peak Stephenson.
And yes, peak Stephenson was his first year in the system
Hill certainly has a lot of potential, I don't see why it can't be unlocked with us
More than agree with that. Premiership player looks good on the Wikipedia page but says nothing about ability. Look at some of the past premiership players from 2012-2018. There are some ordinary names in those lineups that played well on one day in September or October and won a medal. The Bulldogs list of 2016 was the weakest out of the lot. I often think we validate players too easily for winning a flag when only one team can do that in the year and good players are frequently drafted to ordinary teams. Or injury strikes. Or they lose a grand final. In America, championships help define legacies but they aren't the sole determinant of success. Same in European football.Freo will have to cough up significantly more then their first for Jackson. Pick 14 will only for a part of that trade, so no, you’re wrong on that.
Being a premiership player doesn’t automatically make you better. Take that out of consideration for his value.
Grundy isn’t coming off a knee reco.
They’ll use pick 14 and probably their future first and have something coming back their way. It’s not as simple as “they need a top 10 pick” because that’s not always feasible.
That’s the outlier, but also isn’t someone new to the club.Except we gave Moore 6.
And he is an outlier. Jeez he's playing well at the moment.That’s the outlier, but also isn’t someone new to the club.
We do now. Ash Magic JohnsonElliott is a great forward. Except he lacks about 20cm required to play the role he does. He plays well but he and we'd be better if we had a marking forward who was taller.
Wasn’t sold before simply because of potential cost, always hard to gauge given he’s 29 despite being elite in many areas, but given adams longevity I’m all aboardSam Edmond just confirmed that T.Mitchell to us on Sen.
Beggars can't be choosers!Wasn’t sold before simply because of potential cost, always hard to gauge given he’s 29 despite being elite in many areas, but given adams longevity I’m all aboard
Surely we can get both, though list spots might be toughFrom the Gold Coast Board:
"Fiorini's people have had talks with Collingwood - he's 2nd choice if they don't get Tom Mitchell from Hawks.
Hawks have talked to Sam Flanders people.
Hawks also talking to other young players from other clubs (Bergman, Bruhn, Duursma) so lots of competition.
Both their people are Hemisphere Management.
If they have been tasked with moving them on - good call, as they have strong ties with Collingwood and Hawthorn (and manage a couple of fringe Hawks)
Just chatting atm - SO I'M TOLD"
FYI