Sorry, I should have called you ignorant. That's not an insult, it's an observation.You call me “dumb“, then finish with “my friend”. I don’t get how you think you’ll get my respect?
Are you saying lock downs do not reduce infection rates, do not protect the vulnerable, do not protect our health systems?In regards to your post.
I supported the lockdowns initially, I supported them because I thought it was necessary to make a sacrifice to flatten the curve, get our health system prepared and protect the vulnerable. I supported the lockdowns with the belief that the government could in fact facilitate this adequately, both in terms of the management of stay at home measures as well as the protocols around return travellers and quarantine. I was critical in terms of transparency, I wanted some clarity on the journey out, what does this look like and how do we get there? That was slow coming, but eventually, it was broadcasted albeit in a poorly and flimsy manner.
What has transpired since has been inconceivably bad, the ineptness and lack of professionalism from the state government is the reason we are now in this position and someone needs to responsibility.
Do you agree that having "leaky" lock downs increases infection rates?
If you know lock downs decrease transmission, why do want you them lifted?
Why would you not want to plug the leaks instead?
Would you want the new leadership to impose more leaky lock downs or make them more effective?Daniel Andrews continually states “I’m the leader”, “I’m the captain”, well as the leader you need to take responsibility and admit you can’t manage this and someone needs to be handed the reigns who can. Who that is, I don’t know but the evidence is quite clear that the trio of DA/Sutton and Mikakos are in over their heads.