Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the outcome of the review last Thursday.Cobby’s matter will be reviewed again on March 30.'
So, up to another 12 years for this thread.
'Retrospective review of thousands of shelved DNA samples yet to begin'
'By LYDIA LYNCH'
'5:46PM JUNE 21, 2023
A review of thousands of forensic samples shelved during Queensland’s DNA disaster is yet to begin, putting at risk a key recommendation from a royal commission-style inquiry.
More than 7000 forensic samples taken from major crime scenes, such as rapes and murders, were rejected by the health department’s lab between 2018 and 2022 because they fell below a very high DNA testing threshold.
Former judge Walter Sofronoff KC, who oversaw a public inquiry into the lab, recommended in December that the government retrospectively review cases within 12 months to determine which forensic samples be retested.
About 200 cases currently before the courts have been prioritised for review and additional testing done on 50 samples, the Queensland Police Service confirmed. “At this point in time there have been no new offenders identified,” a spokesman said.
But a review of 7000 historic samples ignored by the lab for years is yet to commence. State government sources have told The Australian the retrospective review is due to commence “soon”, but the state’s DNA lab was “totally overwhelmed”.
It comes as a closed-door meeting of forensic and legal experts was last week told it could take scientists up to 12 years to clear cases affected by the lab’s bungles.
Queensland Health said the timeline was speculation, but it was not disputed by forensic experts at the meeting, including Forensic Science Queensland chief executive Linzi Wilson-Wilde, The Courier-Mail reported. Deputy Chief Magistrate Anthony Gett told a court in May there were “10,000 cases in backlog for DNA testing”, which relate to “business-as-usual cases”, not historic samples being re-examined.
...'
New episode.