catempire
Premium Platinum
They weren’t because it’s false.Last night on footy class ... there was something mentioned about him not being overly happy about trading away our picks but they were not definitive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
They weren’t because it’s false.Last night on footy class ... there was something mentioned about him not being overly happy about trading away our picks but they were not definitive.
Even if the job is being split though the principle is the same. Unless you're being shoved out and don't care about the new group doing well which I don't think is happening hereIf he's directly handing over to someone else, yes that person gets the reins. No one else though.
No current season stats available
What was interesting was reading that he was stood down last year when covid hit. Troy Selwood wasn’t stood down; but Stephen was. That tells me that Stephen wells has been leapfrogged structurally at the cats. I can also tell you (please don’t ask for a source because I won’t be giving one) that Wells was annoyed that he was overruled on recent early picks - he didn’t want a couple of particular young players who’ve selected and Selwood and Mackie did. So where this is at IMO is that Stephen’s realised that footy clubs are only loyal when they see you as having value to them, and the minute they don’t see you as being crucial, they’ll drop you like a bad habit (in his case stand you down during covid)
Watch for him to finish the year part time, and then turn up at another club as ist manager next year.
Cheers. I hope he got flown up for the grand final. I know everyone's time comes eventually be he at least deserved that.What was interesting was reading that he was stood down last year when covid hit. Troy Selwood wasn’t stood down; but Stephen was. That tells me that Stephen wells has been leapfrogged structurally at the cats. I can also tell you (please don’t ask for a source because I won’t be giving one) that Wells was annoyed that he was overruled on recent early picks - he didn’t want a couple of particular young players who’ve selected and Selwood and Mackie did. So where this is at IMO is that Stephen’s realised that footy clubs are only loyal when they see you as having value to them, and the minute they don’t see you as being crucial, they’ll drop you like a bad habit (in his case stand you down during covid)
Watch for him to finish the year part time, and then turn up at another club as ist manager next year.
Hutchy knows what's going on at the cats. He'll say things like it's a rumour when he knows for sure.They weren’t because it’s false.
I can say with great confidence that this is one occasion where he is wide of the mark.Hutchy knows what's going on at the cats. He'll say things like it's a rumour when he knows for sure.
Fair enough. He's usually right but ill take your word for it.I can say with great confidence that this is one occasion where he is wide of the mark.
Andrew Mackie isn't it?
I can say with great confidence that this is one occasion where he is wide of the mark.
What was interesting was reading that he was stood down last year when covid hit. Troy Selwood wasn’t stood down; but Stephen was. That tells me that Stephen wells has been leapfrogged structurally at the cats. I can also tell you (please don’t ask for a source because I won’t be giving one) that Wells was annoyed that he was overruled on recent early picks - he didn’t want a couple of particular young players who’ve selected and Selwood and Mackie did. So where this is at IMO is that Stephen’s realised that footy clubs are only loyal when they see you as having value to them, and the minute they don’t see you as being crucial, they’ll drop you like a bad habit (in his case stand you down during covid)
Watch for him to finish the year part time, and then turn up at another club as ist manager next year.
I dont think it was Hutchy as much as Sam McClure.. but without watching it back... my impression was not that he said something specifically happened ... but there was a vibe of unhappiness. If he turns up somewhere else then that give that vibe validation.
You sound confident on your information. Are you saying that vibe is totally wrong... that he totally content and not unhappy at all and that his walking away is just him being sick of the job?
I dont think it was Hutchy as much as Sam McClure.. but without watching it back... my impression was not that he said something specifically happened ... but there was a vibe of unhappiness. If he turns up somewhere else then that give that vibe validation.
You sound confident on your information. Are you saying that vibe is totally wrong... that he totally content and not unhappy at all and that his walking away is just him being sick of the job?
I’ll send you a PM mate.I dont think it was Hutchy as much as Sam McClure.. but without watching it back... my impression was not that he said something specifically happened ... but there was a vibe of unhappiness. If he turns up somewhere else then that give that vibe validation.
You sound confident on your information. Are you saying that vibe is totally wrong... that he totally content and not unhappy at all and that his walking away is just him being sick of the job?
Be as that may be , clubs still have to balance it with their future relationship with the club trade wise. The way that GWS played it by leaking everything leading up to the Grand Finals and refusing the compo which was better than what we had to give just leaves a very bad impression given that JC gave 10-11 years services at GWS and should had been treated more fairly.I'm not sure why there is and was such a big deal being made out for the picks we traded for Cameron. We absolutely robbed West Coast for Tim Kelly. Turning a speculative mature aged player, who we drafted with pick 24, into all of those picks within a two year timeframe, was just ridiculous and we got very lucky there. Given most of what was traded for Cameron came from the Kelly trade, I really don't see the issue with it.
With all those picks we had, there was no way in hell GWS were going to let him walk for a compo pick. They simply exercised their rights within the rules, and I'd hope we would do the same. Clubs have to look after themselves. We made the right call and we still have some good picks this year to work with. You just don't let a player of Cameron's ilk get away when he says he wants in. We're lucky he chose us - clubs like Pies, Hawks etc would have been desperate for him..
Be interesting to know which early pick where he did not have the final say on. and who he would have preferred. Perhaps Georgiades before Cooper Stephens?
If Wells is this god like genius people on bigfooty think he is who uses his picks to find diamonds in the roughIt was more McClure I think .
Happy about the trade? Who knows... but I could imagine him not being totally in love with being forced to trade anything.. spend so much time on studying the kids to then just have to trade it all away.
I do not believe that just because SW oversaw the deal that he wanted to do it... he would have instructions ... some sort of get it done instruction.
Someone in his position could hardly just walk away from the trade if those above him have made it clear that the deal is more important than the picks.
If Wells is this god like genius people on bigfooty think he is who uses his picks to find diamonds in the rough
Why the hell would you give away picks or trade away picks for old guys?
Wouldn't you want to give him as many picks as possibly?
I do not think he is a deity or has some sort omnipresence... the draft is a que and by the time we get to the front all the best product, the most tempting enticing product is usually gone.. so the further back in the que we go the harder it is to find a tasty morsel. He has mostly done well with the picks we have had.. but we have not had a pick inside 10 since 2006... and most of the best young kids seem to come from this number. With a good eye and time we can often find the right player to develop and have done so with the likes of Parfitt or Guthrie etc .... so I dont not think its about as many picks as possible , often Id have been happier to add just one top end kid and a couple of late picks.
SW is only half the equation ... developing the kids is just as important
I've posted elsewhere previously of my belief that there is something 'wrong' about the club and playing group atm.
No sources, no info, just a vibe I've felt from listening and watching. Something just doesn't seem right. People don't seem happy. Imo.
Now we have two posters here, both confident in their source/s, with what appears to be polar opposite information.
Not everyone is singing from the same page it seems.
If Wells is this god like genius people on bigfooty think he is who uses his picks to find diamonds in the rough
Why the hell would you give away picks or trade away picks for old guys?
Wouldn't you want to give him as many picks as possibly?
Alarms started ringing for me when we got Caddy. He wasn't that good at the GC.I don't think that's new. Alarms for me started going off when Caddy was traded. Not just that he was traded (and was under contract), but that on a Monday Selwood said he was a required player, three days later he was gone. You'd think some kind of consistency in communication would have been agreed beforehand.
I don't think that's new. Alarms for me started going off when Caddy was traded. Not just that he was traded (and was under contract), but that on a Monday Selwood said he was a required player, three days later he was gone. You'd think some kind of consistency in communication would have been agreed beforehand.