Geelong 2007 vs. Collingwood 2010 - Neutrals only

[oscarheel]

I thought Geelong in 2007 had won of the most dominant seasons ever. Winning 18 games (15 in a row), & winning 2 finals by over 100 points. Not to mention there superstars were in the prime of there careers.

Collingwood had an impressive year also. But don't come anywhere near imho.

Geelong & Collingwood supporters need not reply.

 

[Claude Balls]

You do realise Collingwood supporters can barely read? At least not big words like Neutral, or Public and Poll.

 

[cosby]

You do realise Collingwood supporters can barely read? At least not big words like Neutral, or Public and Poll.

Proven by the fact that 2 Collingwood supporters are the only votes for 'Collingwood'.

 

[liam_13]

people say a champion team will always beat a team of champions, but geelong of 2007 were both.
and i say a team that relys on numerous superstars at its peak will beat a team with better tactical nous at its peak.

cats.

 

[Tulip]

One team drew their grand final. The other won it by 20 goals.

Geelong

 

[Daicos Mullets]

I'm a Pies supporter, but Geelong 07 were so clearly above the rest of the competition.

 

[carntheroos4eva]

Would have to say Geelong for obvious reasons.

Collingwood were awesome this year though.

 

[hellfire]

Neutrals only, so I won't vote, just comment.

The Cats were more dominant, and probably better overall. But I think we had tougher competition. The 2nd and 3rd best teams in 2010 were far superior to the 2nd and 3rd best teams of 2007. So it was tougher for us to be as dominant.

Nevertheless, Cats take it.

 

[Byron_Clanger]

Geelong because they pounded their opposition and it didn't take them two attempts to win a Grand Final, case and point 119

 

[Power King]

I thought Geelong in 2007 had won of the most dominant seasons ever. Winning 18 games (15 in a row), & winning 2 finals by over 100 points. Not to mention there superstars were in the prime of there careers.

Collingwood had an impressive year also. But don't come anywhere near imho.

Geelong & Collingwood supporters need not reply.

Surely you realised that geelong and collingwood supporters were going to vote regardless of what you state.

Common sense thing to do would be have to have four options:

Geelong
Collingwood
Geelong (cats fan)
Collingwood (pies fan)

Anyway, Geelong for obvious reasons.

 

[Jade]

Geelong by a considerable freakin distance...

 

[Stifler's mom]

Collingwood 2010 would destroy Collingwood 2007.

Geelong 2007 beat Collingwood 2007 by 6 points after a weeks break and the Pies playing extra time and returning from Perth.

Maybe not as clear cut as you think.

BTW, I haven't voted.

 

[half_back_flank]

I thought Geelong in 2007 had won of the most dominant seasons ever. Winning 18 games (15 in a row), & winning 2 finals by over 100 points. Not to mention there superstars were in the prime of there careers.

Collingwood had an impressive year also. But don't come anywhere near imho.

Geelong & Collingwood supporters need not reply.

You do realise Collingwood supporters can barely read? At least not big words like Neutral, or Public and Poll.

Lulz.

Disclaimer: Replying to Claude, not OP.

 

[Topper Harley]

Lulz.

Disclaimer: Replying to Claude, not OP.

Disclaimer doesn't count, you replied. Therefore you lose...

 

[tigers_of_old_08]

I thought Geelong in 2007 had won of the most dominant seasons ever. Winning 18 games (15 in a row), & winning 2 finals by over 100 points. Not to mention there superstars were in the prime of there careers.

Collingwood had an impressive year also. But don't come anywhere near imho.

Geelong & Collingwood supporters need not reply.

Well that was never gonna happen.

Yup, an impressive year by the Pies, but the Cats were supermen in '07.

 

[Claude Balls]

Collingwood 2010 would destroy Collingwood 2007.

Geelong 2007 beat Collingwood 2007 by 6 points after a weeks break and the Pies playing extra time and returning from Perth.

Maybe not as clear cut as you think.

BTW, I haven't voted.

There is no logic like that in footy.

 

[Stifler's mom]

There is no logic like that in footy.

I think the fact that Port arrived with their pants around their ankles and leaving 119 points behind may have distorted peoples memories.

 

[Kings Army]

Cats for me - however Cats of 09 V Pies of 10 would have been the better poll.

 

[BONG RIPS MKII]

pies only dominated the second half of this year anyway

 

[Stifler's mom]

pies only dominated the second half of this year anyway

If the 1st half counted, Sunshine Sally would have won a Melbourne Cup!

 

[Claude Balls]

I think the fact that Port arrived with their pants around their ankles and leaving 119 points behind may have distorted peoples memories.

19 wins out of the last 20 (15 in a row) and a percentage over 150 probably have just as much to do with 84% of people in this poll voting Geelong as the 20 goal GF margin.

What may have distorted some memories is the 2010 GF replay. St Kilda had you the week before.

 

[Football God]

07 prelim cats beat pies by 5 points
10 prelim pies beats cats by 41 points

10 pies > 07 cats.

 

[Claude Balls]

07 prelim cats beat pies by 5 points
10 prelim pies beats cats by 41 points

10 pies > 07 cats.

07 Cats would beat 10 Cats by 12 goals.

10 Pies beat 10 Cats by 41 points.

07 Cats > 10 Pies.

Seriously, why is it only Collingwood supporters who persist with this 'logic'. It's well known it doesn't exist in footy.

 

[Football God]

07 Cats would beat 10 Cats by 12 goals.

10 Pies beat 10 Cats by 41 points.

07 Cats > 10 Pies.

Seriously, why is it only Collingwood supporters who persist with this 'logic'. It's well known it doesn't exist in footy.

As they are the same team that means sweet **** all

 

[Claude Balls]

As they are the same team that means sweet **** all

In that case I guess you'll agree Collingwood 2009 and 2010 are essentially as good as each other? I can draw a ridiculous line of logic from that too.

Stop being so thick.