Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
For Curtin or Sanders to be there at 8, we need teams above us to pick both Caddy and O'Sullivan, who are the likeliest candidates for those 2.
I think Dempsey will get promoted and we'll sign a delisted FA ... probably Hayes or Lycett.
We'll take 4 picks to the draft.
He's just making the best of a bad situation.Maybe Mackie is planning on trading out of this draft and into 24 draft. Maybe that's why he wanted the later picks?
The Dutch guy we had in the VFL will now surely be looked at. Was thinking more as a rookie though than in the main draft.
GWS I think take one of the 2.
My mail is the delays were caused by Port and Port alone.
We were open to get it moving, Port wouldn't get back to us...
Watching Mack on Trade Radio there only backs it up as well
Port are s**t to deal with and it's not a coincidence that all their deals are taking till the last day
I agree Sav is better than most on here rate him. Can't blame him for going. $700k a year for 5 years plus probably guaranteed games. Who could blame him. Would have got $400-500k for 2 years with us you suspect and not in best 22 if everyone is fit and in form.It's a win for Port.
Sav is better than he is portrayed here, but he is now where he wants to be, and we need to develop DeK to his absolute potential, and rely on Kolo as the other KB.
Cooper Trembath please
We won’t but if we were to hold our picks then I’d go something like this -
8 - Sanders or Curtin (reckon there’s a 50% chance one will fall). If both gone next best for me is O’Sullivan.
25 - Hastie - he’ll land around here in the draft.
76 - Philactides - well regarded as a bottom aged player last year. Gone off the radar a bit this year but will make a useful small defender imo.
87 - George Stevens - reckon there’s a chance he goes undrafted. Happy to roll the dice on him this late in the draft if we don’t take Sanders earlier.
Van de heuvel? Yeah look he would be essentially a straight swap for the kpd depth spot we have vacant now sav is gone (same age too) and obviously we know the family and they know us. Wouldnt surprise me if the other pick was mannagh he would be fairly p n p for us. Chalcraft deserves a rookie spot purely for consistency (like atkins did) but i doubt he gets it.
Yeah because 25 right at the start of trade period wasn't enough so Mackie wanted draft picks equalling zero draft points to get it done but it was all Ports fault!!!My mail is the delays were caused by Port and Port alone.
We were open to get it moving, Port wouldn't get back to us...
Watching Mack on Trade Radio there only backs it up as well
Port are s**t to deal with and it's not a coincidence that all their deals are taking till the last day
You can just upgrade rookies - don't need to use draft picks to do soi think we might use those late picks to upgrade rookies, then look to the rookie draft. Mackie has stated on several occasions we have been studying players at the back end of the draft.
That’s him. We clearly need a mature bodied KPD now that Ratagolea is gone.
Chalcraft is a very good VFL player. I think that’s his ceiling. I’d go elsewhere.
Sanders if hes there. If hes not id trade back for 2 picks depending on the offer.
Clay Hall or demattia for me as mid range mids.
Then a depth kpd and mannagh at the back end.
Do like stevens though.
All three will cost us 25 I’m betting…That sounds like a bad deal, need all three.
Your club just haggled the entire period to get some 4th rounders thrown in with the BZT and Duursma deal. You forfeited your right to take the moral high ground.Yeah because 25 right at the start of trade period wasn't enough so Mackie wanted draft picks equalling zero draft points to get it done but it was all Ports fault!!!
Saying Dutch guy is easier than saying Bailey Van De HeuvelThe Dutch guy we had in the VFL will now surely be looked at. Was thinking more as a rookie though than in the main draft.
Sanders if hes there. If hes not id trade back for 2 picks depending on the offer.
Clay Hall or demattia for me as mid range mids.
Then a depth kpd and mannagh at the back end.
Do like stevens though.
Agree with this 100%Van de heuvel? Yeah look he would be essentially a straight swap for the kpd depth spot we have vacant now sav is gone (same age too) and obviously we know the family and they know us. Wouldnt surprise me if the other pick was mannagh he would be fairly p n p for us. Chalcraft deserves a rookie spot purely for consistency (like atkins did) but i doubt he gets it.
Not a fan of Curtin?
Then we won't be getting that upgrade from them...Gws wont take nate (hello flight risk).
They would definitely take sanders or osullivan though.
Port copying us by haggling for 70s picks lol.