- Jul 14, 2005
- 18,723
- 29,567
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC
- Banned
- #601
Doesn’t make a difference one way or another.You didn’t watch the clip, did you.
Using Kane Cornes comments to add validity to an opinion either way is hilarious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn’t make a difference one way or another.You didn’t watch the clip, did you.
Where did Stephens and Meek finish in their previous clubs B&F’s?
Mitchell finished 5th, JOM 7th and Gunston 11th (16 games). To say they weren’t amongst your clubs best players is lying.
Carlton supporters know this all too well.It all comes down to age and potential mate.
Of course it makes a difference, because I would bet that you were parroting the same rhetoric at the start of the year that they were worth little in a trade.Doesn’t make a difference one way or another.
Using Kane Cornes comments to add validity to an opinion either way is hilarious.
Well you’d be wrong.Of course it makes a difference, because I would bet that you were parroting the same rhetoric at the start of the year that they were worth little in a trade.
I would argue we got better value than that for O'Meara. A ruck and 2nd round pick for O'Meara and a 4th round pickWell you’d be wrong.
I’d clearly gone on record as saying Mitchell was worth a late 1st at the end of 2021, JOM a late first-early second.
Mitchell did a fair bit to dent their value this year.
And yet we still got Meek in and a future 2nd, when Freo were asking for a second alone for him before JOM was on the move.Well you’d be wrong.
I’d clearly gone on record as saying Mitchell was worth a late 1st at the end of 2021, JOM a late first-early second.
Mitchell did a fair bit to dent their value this year.
“Amongst”?
That’s not was was posted. “Your best players” was written, and Tom and JOM were not that.
Words.Semantics.
I would argue we got better value than that for O'Meara. A ruck and 2nd round pick for O'Meara and a 4th round pick
Meek is a 24yo backup ruckman who’s played less than 20 games of football.And yet we still got Meek in and a future 2nd, when Freo were asking for a second alone for him before JOM was on the move.
And for Tom we got a kid we were looking to get across at the end of 2023 a year earlier, as well as late picks that helped us trade up on draft night.
The whole idea that we got nothing for them is false.
Meek is a 24yo backup ruckman who’s played less than 20 games of football.
Not shooting for the stars here.
All clubs do their due diligence on players.10 clubs enquired about his services. We were fortunate enough to 'win the race'.
No guarantees, but he's shown decent signs at AFL level, tremendous signs at reserve level and joins a club who just lost their number 1 ruck. He'll get his opportunity now.
Gunston would have been a handy player to keep around for a couple of years.
Leadership, versatile, decent output, but understandably he wanted another crack at a flag and wasn’t going to get it at Hawthorn.
Don’t think anyone doubts that, but when you fling your best players for peanuts - on top of losing a stack of premiership veterans - there’s a real danger of sinking your professional standards.
Young players ‘creating their own legacy’ is often starry-eyed claptrap.
There’s huge Carlton 2006 vibes around the Hawks right now.
Meek is a 24yo backup ruckman who’s played less than 20 games of football.
Not shooting for the stars here.
Meek isn’t seen as a backup ruckman, which is the exact reason 10 clubs came knocking. He was stuck behind Darcy.Meek is a 24yo backup ruckman who’s played less than 20 games of football.
Not shooting for the stars here.
He’s predominantly a WAFL ruckman.Meek isn’t seen as a backup ruckman, which is the exact reason 10 clubs came knocking. He was stuck behind Darcy.
He’s predominantly a WAFL ruckman.
I like him as a prospect but wouldn’t have given up a proven senior midfielder to bring him in.
Hawks fans celebrating taking on reserves players in their mid 20’s really is hitting different though. Real resetting of expectations over the past couple of off seasons.
Much like Pittonet was a VFL ruckman who was stuck behind McEvoy and Ceglar, until given a chance with Kreuzer retiring? Sometimes they simply need an opportunity.He’s predominantly a WAFL ruckman.
I like him as a prospect but wouldn’t have given up a proven senior midfielder to bring him in.
Hawks fans celebrating taking on reserves players in their mid 20’s really is hitting different though. Real resetting of expectations over the past couple of off seasons.
Yes because he was behind Darcy and was only let go when Fremantle landed Jackson.... he would be your number one ruckmen and you know it.He’s predominantly a WAFL ruckman.
I like him as a prospect but wouldn’t have given up a proven senior midfielder to bring him in.
Hawks fans celebrating taking on reserves players in their mid 20’s really is hitting different though. Real resetting of expectations over the past couple of off seasons.
Our club was years away from contending because of how deeply we cut the list.The extra selection we received in the trade has become our future second round pick, allowing us to trade the other to acquire the pick that secured Josh Weddle.
If Carlton, for example, had Jaeger O'Meara with identical output since 2017, are you saying you wouldn't trade him if it meant Meek and Weddle joined your club? Especially if your side was currently years away from contending?
Agreed, but as I have said I’d much prefer retaining an onballer given the Hawks lack of midfield depth and experience.Much like Pittonet was a VFL ruckman who was stuck behind McEvoy and Ceglar, until given a chance with Kreuzer retiring? Sometimes they simply need an opportunity.
Well he isn’t as good as good a ruck as Pittonet or as good at ground level or forward of the ball as TDK, so he’d likely be 3rd in line and potentially 4th depending on Mirkov’s progression over the off season.Yes because he was behind Darcy and was only let go when Fremantle landed Jackson.... he would be your number one ruckmen and you know it.
Yes because he was behind Darcy and was only let go when Fremantle landed Jackson.... he would be your number one ruckmen and you know it.