If Patrick Dangerfield Comes Within 3 Votes of a Brownlow...

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gill would be happy if he gave 'no heart' another one, try and justify yet another joke decision by the powers to be.
 
Didn't Dangerfield get off on a high bump last year while Brownlow favourite?

Hope he gets more votes than Martin, he won't, but I really hope he does. Would love to see the melts when Dangerfield has to hand over the Charlie to Dusty.
Classic richmond supporter morals. Belong in the gutter. Disgusting.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

People forget how good of a season Dangerfield had aswell. Could be close but i'd say Martin will be the winner regardless of who's eligible.
Don't you have to be able to pass to teammates to have a good season?
 
Point validated.
How the **** did Duncan get 3 in R22 v Collingwood over Dangerfield who didn't even poll.

Classic corrupt AFL faking the votes like they did in 2014 to avoid the Fyfe controversy. Priddis played terribly R23 2014.

Should've been a tie (obviously Danger losing still) but end this stupid rule.
Was quite confused with that one. After all the random shit which we have seen go on in the past two weeks, these votes would be up there. Absolutely would not be surprised if that happened too.
 
Go watch the Final between Richmond and Geelong and tell me which of Martin, Cotchin, Selwood and/or Dangerfield are playing selfish football.
Jesus christ man get some perspective. Selwood has played sacrificial football at Geelong from the age of 18 that directly contributed to 3 flags, upon arrival at the club he actively helped change the culture of selfishness that had been there for a while. In his first year. And hasn't let up since.

Cotchin started the year after Selwood,has been playing nearly 10 years and but for this year was regarded as player who's style didn't impact games or lift the team often enough.
 
How the **** did Duncan get 3 in R22 v Collingwood over Dangerfield who didn't even poll.

Classic corrupt AFL faking the votes like they did in 2014 to avoid the Fyfe controversy. Priddis played terribly R23 2014.

Should've been a tie (obviously Danger losing still) but end this stupid rule.
He should have gotten 0 against us. So it makes up for it
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Shouldn't have Geelong fans been rooting for him NOT to top the count? I remember when Mitchell was ineligible and a hot favourite I was groaning when he was leading at some stage.
 
Jesus christ man get some perspective. Selwood has played sacrificial football at Geelong from the age of 18 that directly contributed to 3 flags, upon arrival at the club he actively helped change the culture of selfishness that had been there for a while. In his first year. And hasn't let up since.

Cotchin started the year after Selwood,has been playing nearly 10 years and but for this year was regarded as player who's style didn't impact games or lift the team often enough.

Yeah, he has sacrificed his reputation for that club. Lay off him.
 
Shouldn't have Geelong fans been rooting for him NOT to top the count? I remember when Mitchell was ineligible and a hot favourite I was groaning when he was leading at some stage.
Not really.

He’s already got a medal, it’s not like Grant or Mckernan where that one chance missed would eat away at them forever. Finishing with the most votes would still be a nice endorsement that what you’re doing is good.
 
Shouldn't have Geelong fans been rooting for him NOT to top the count? I remember when Mitchell was ineligible and a hot favourite I was groaning when he was leading at some stage.
I didn't want him to win for this reason but it's jus annoying because he was robbed 3 votes in the way Priddis was gifted votes in 2014 to avoid the Fyfe fiasco.

Pffft giving Duncan votes in that match over him.
 
How the **** did Duncan get 3 in R22 v Collingwood over Dangerfield who didn't even poll.

Classic corrupt AFL faking the votes like they did in 2014 to avoid the Fyfe controversy. Priddis played terribly R23 2014.

Should've been a tie (obviously Danger losing still) but end this stupid rule.
I had a bet on Menegola to get 3 that round paying $6 because I had the hunch a dodgy would happen. Menegola was second best to Dangerfield that day. Instead Menegola got 2 votes as he should have and Duncan was inserted in there. Has the markings of a name swap IMO.
 
Fyfe probably should have been suspended 3 or 4 times in 2015.

Danger stiff he didn't get the benefit of Charlie's halo.
 
FFS, Salt?
You've how many finals in this century?
Yeah but it’s amazing what one does to the minnow clubs, your club excepted of course.

Salt, pepper vinegar. Might need to go to port Hedland and get some sea salt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top