Current Jeffrey Epstein - The fallout

Who killed Jeffrey Epstein?

  • He killed himself

    Votes: 15 12.6%

  • Rank incompetence enabled his suicide

    Votes: 17 14.3%

  • Bill Clinton

    Votes: 30 25.2%

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 20 16.8%

  • The Russians

    Votes: 2 1.7%

  • The Saudis

    Votes: 3 2.5%

  • MI5/6 - British Royals

    Votes: 22 18.5%

  • Ghislane Maxwell

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • Someone's Dad

    Votes: 9 7.6%
  • Total voters
    119

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Kane McGoodwin said:
Hopefully.

She now has a reason to name them & provide evidence to reduce her sentence... though gather she will wait until after appeals.
Click to expand...

FrankGrimes said:
I asked this question on the conspiracy board a while ago, who actually killed Epstein? The former cell mate?
and why wouldn’t she name names now to get a reduced sentence?
Click to expand...

I don't think there are any more to name - they've already been exposed through court cases and leaks. Now we will see if there are any indictable criminal charges against any of them, starting with Andrew, and if they will be convicted or walk away.
 
BFew said:
Might be a bit of negotiations going on in the background with who is allowed to be named, and who is prepared to do what in order not to be named, and what potential damage those they might name, could inflict on others. One big dirt file bun-fight behind the scenes probably, if you are looking at it through the cloudy lens of it being some form of a national security entrapment and blackmail op. which is probably still going, albeit in a very different phase than its earlier years.

Assuming she was working hand in glove with Intel, just like her Daddy, (and possibly other family members), you'd think there would be some codes of treatment for what happens to ex agents/assets, that will be shaping and strongly influencing what happens next.
Click to expand...

I don't believe this is the situation. I think he was a dirty pedo and she helped him (I don't fully understand why, but possibly for emotional, romantic, and pragmatic/financial reasons) and they got caught. Those also potentially involved in their crimes (Andrew, Brunel, Dershowitz, I may have forgotten a few) have already been exposed. Whether they can be charged and convicted (if they are actually guilty) is another matter altogether.
 
jason_recliner said:
I don't think there are any more to name - they've already been exposed through court cases and leaks. Now we will see if there are any indictable criminal charges against any of them, starting with Andrew, and if they will be convicted or walk away.
Click to expand...
Doubtful... as I think there are plenty of people who haven't yet been named. Tip of the iceberg.
 
jason_recliner said:
How do you think they avoided any scrutiny whatsoever the last 15 years?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately this is a typical period for paedophiles... particularly well funded & organised ones... & helped by corrupt judiciary who let him off lightly when 1st caught.
 
JackNah_8 said:
Latest news


www.dailymail.co.uk

Settlement between Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Robert is unsealed

The settlement between Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Giuffre has been released.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...

Unless there is an unknown legal strategy at play here, I can't understand why Virginia Giuffre legal team allowed the settlement document to be unsealed - because assuming the article accurately portrays the specific wording, it's defies and contradicts her current claim and/or against anyone regarding historical sexual assault allegations related to her involvement with Epstein..?

I could be wrong, but irrespective of media interpretations, cause for dismissal with the current VG against PA case looks far more likely now...
 
Last edited:
Kurve said:
Newly released documents from 2009 reveal that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein settled the lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre for $US500,000. Prince Andrew argues the deal means he cannot be sued.
Click to expand...
It doesn't constitute justice but an agreement made free of intimidation and by an adult of sound mind should stand, so I could see why he would be upset.

Still - I've stood in her home, enjoyed the view from her balcony - torch him in the daylight for all to see as far as I'm concerned. If the agreement was for something else, or not made in a fair state then throw it out and deduct the $500,000 USD + interest from the total if there is a finding in her favor.
 
deanc said:
Unless there is an unknown legal strategy at play here, I can't understand why Virginia Giuffre legal team allowed the settlement document to be unsealed - because assuming the article accurately portrays the specific wording, it's defies and contradicts her current claim and/or against anyone regarding historical sexual assault allegations related to her involvement with Epstein..?

I could be wrong, but irrespective of media interpretations, cause for dismissal with the current VG against PA case looks far more likely now...
Click to expand...
Isn’t she pushing the trafficking angle more now? That may not have been covered in the settlement, which seems to relate to abuse. Also, it might depend on the jurisdiction of both cases, and whether one is binding on the orther.
 
Taylor said:
It doesn't constitute justice but an agreement made free of intimidation and by an adult of sound mind should stand, so I could see why he would be upset.

Still - I've stood in her home, enjoyed the view from her balcony - torch him in the daylight for all to see as far as I'm concerned. If the agreement was for something else, or not made in a fair state then throw it out and deduct the $500,000 USD + interest from the total if there is a finding in her favor.
Click to expand...

Giuffre was actually recruited by a now convicted Maxwell and had sex with Andrew in Maxwell's house but her representation argues that Andrew wasn't named in the agreement, he didn't know about it and wasn't subject to jurisdction in Florida.
 
Kurve said:
Giuffre was actually recruited by a now convicted Maxwell and had sex with Andrew in Maxwell's house but her representation argues that Andrew wasn't named in the agreement, he didn't know about it and wasn't subject to jurisdction in Florida.
Click to expand...

I’m not a legal expert but on plain reading it’s ambiguous. Federal vs state law may come into it as well.

Would he need to know about it for it to cover him? If it reads that it applies to anyone who could potentially be a defendant, that’s a very broad brush.

As you said, she’s accused him of abusing her in Maxwell’s London home so you’d think it wouldn’t be binding in that jurisdiction.

This covers it fairly objectively:

www.abc.net.au

Epstein deal reveals secret $US500,000 payout to Andrew accuser

A previously confidential document reveals that Virginia Giuffre was paid $695,000 to drop her lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bits said:
I’m not a legal expert but on plain reading it’s ambiguous. Federal vs state law may come into it as well.

Would he need to know about it for it to cover him? If it reads that it applies to anyone who could potentially be a defendant, that’s a very broad brush.

As you said, she’s accused him of abusing her in Maxwell’s London home so you’d think it wouldn’t be binding in that jurisdiction.

This covers it fairly objectively:

www.abc.net.au

Epstein deal reveals secret $US500,000 payout to Andrew accuser

A previously confidential document reveals that Virginia Giuffre was paid $695,000 to drop her lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
Click to expand...

I'm also not a lawyer , so take this with a pinch of salt. It seems to me that their argument is based on jurisdiction. An extreme example would be a court in Afhanistan pardoning somebody, and any potential conspirators, for a crime comitted in Florida. Would a Florida court, or Federal USA court, be required to uphold this verdict? Or could they launch a new case as victims were in Florida, not Afghanistan? Or there might even be victims in NY, or California, or England. I know it's not the same thing at all, but I think this is the sort of angle Giuffre is working (and why they wanted the agreement released).
 
sprockets said:
How can a person have a legal agreement with another person on behalf of someone else, ie, how can Epstein and Guiffre have an agreement that, say, Prince Andrew can't be sued by Guiffre?
Click to expand...
US legal system in that case was severely corrupted.
Everyone that agreed to let that happen needs to be prosecuted and jailed as a deterrent to the legal community letting that happen ever again.
 
Looking more likely there could be a retrial - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-n...uror-mistrial-saga-hires-fake-heiress-lawyer/

The juror at the centre of Ghislaine Maxwell’s bid for a retrial incorrectly told the court he had not been a victim of sexual assault, The Telegraph understands.
A source with knowledge of the case told The Telegraph that the juror had answered “no” to the question of whether they had ever been a victim of sexual assault.

At issue is whether Scotty incorrectly answered a question during the selection process on whether he had any personal experience of sexual abuse. Scotty told Reuters he “flew through” the 50 questions on the juror questionnaire and does not remember that one.

Legal experts explained that jurors' comments posed two potential issues: perjury and prejudice. That is, respectively, lying under oath and having a preconceived opinion that may have improperly swayed the jury.

Prosecutors requested an inquiry because they had an ethical duty to flag to the court concerns of possible prejudice, said Neama Rahmani, the president of West Coast Trial Lawyers and a former federal prosecutor. But they also took the unusual step of requesting that Scotty be appointed an attorney, which Mr Rahmani said might suggest they believed he could have acted criminally by committing perjury.
Click to expand...
 
I have always believed royalty is one of the most obscene situations in the world. I detest it.

As a child l often asked my parents why we were supposed to worship this family. I just didn't get it and to this day l still struggle that the monarchy even exists. I normally wouldn't give them the time of day.

I'm currently lazing about camping and this royal PA crap appeared on one of my newsfeeds. l watched this cane toad's interview for the first time.

Psychology is my thing. Liar liar, pants on fire!
As in the Fawlty Towers episode, "there's enough there for an entire conference".

Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Brits are freezing in the middle of winter because they can't afford the gas meter. Some will probably die with a news report of poor Prince Andrew on their beds.
 
Last edited:
They can take his monogrammed towells off him but they can't scratch his image off every picture.

The looming threat to the monarchy
Prince Andrew's numerous honorary military titles, the financial support he receives from the Queen, and the small constitutional role he maintains as a counsellor of state have all been called into question.

The British monarchy has never been in such a predicament where a senior royal is accused of such a serious offence, according to Professor Sarah Richardson, a historian at Warwick University.

www.abc.net.au

Exiled from public life, what more could the 'playboy' prince lose after his fall from grace? Plenty

Prince Andrew was once considered the Queen's favourite, but his dramatic fall from grace has put his mother in a position where she must choose between her child and the integrity of the crown.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Jeffrey Epstein - The fallout

Similar threads

Kurve
Current The Vanished Young Men of the Pilbara - WA
Replies
15
Views
1K
Kurve
Kurve
BFew
Solved Parents Accused of Starving their Daughter - Perth *Guilty
Replies
7
Views
390
Corn Cobbers
Corn Cobbers
PatsFitztrick
Current Murder of 19yo Brunswick Local Isla Belle *Two men in their 50s arrested
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
Paul Kersey
Paul Kersey
Kurve
Current Sherriff Murders Judge in the Courthouse Chambers * Kentucky
Replies
13
Views
963
Butters and Pepper
B
Kurve
Current Trial Karen Read Accused of murder of boyfriend police officer in a blizzard - Her defence is the cops killed him
Replies
4
Views
395
Lebbo73
Lebbo73
Bunk Moreland
Unsolved The Pakenham Man
Replies
1
Views
780
Kurve
Kurve
Kurve
Current WANTED Man who threw boiling coffee over a baby in a random attack - Qld *Fled the country
2 3 4 5
Replies
112
Views
6K
Wombot
W
Back
Top