Yeah it's definitely a concern - but I think they are different decisions. Removing an incumbent versus selecting the best replacement once the former decision had been made.If we agree that the club’s hierarchy have not delivered through bad decisions how is anyone ok with the same hierarchy appointing Carr through anointment?
The decision makers have shown very little risk appetite, and yes that may flow on to favouring an internal candidate in Carr, but I'm willing to give them some benefit of the doubt in their capability to select the best new candidate.