List Mgmt. Josh Kelly to North II - It's Over

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Good ole Tom Browne on Triple M has said North have offered $1.1m and 8 years.

No mentioned of sources or anything. Just that Giants want to keep him, North want him, and he thinks it's worth it on his current form.
 
Good ole Tom Browne on Triple M has said North have offered $1.1 over 8 years.

No mentioned of sources or anything. Just that Giants want to keep him, North want him, and he thinks it's worth it on his current form.

Make up figure.

Report on commentary surrounding made up figure.

Profit.
 
Good ole Tom Browne on Triple M has said North have offered $1.1m and 8 years.

No mentioned of sources or anything. Just that Giants want to keep him, North want him, and he thinks it's worth it on his current form.

Sounds like coniglio could be the one they’d rather lose.
They might actually ****en match
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Good ole Tom Browne on Triple M has said North have offered $1.1m and 8 years.

No mentioned of sources or anything. Just that Giants want to keep him, North want him, and he thinks it's worth it on his current form.
Damn, I liked the look of this better.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210629-112159_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20210629-112159_Chrome.jpg
    355.9 KB · Views: 251
He’s worth it if gws don’t match and we get him without giving anything up other than cap space
Worth it to cover the required 95% cap space.
I don't think he's "worth" that much in a vacuum (and the idea of us still offering that much after being turned down so many times kinda rankles), but with the added context of those two points it makes sense. 0 trade cost and frontload the shit out of it so that it's not a burden when we have to be handing out new contracts to our own players. Doneski.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top