Leagues Keeper Fantasy - BigFooty Premier League (Dynasty) - Season 1

[Zim^zuM]

www.keeperfantasy.com

Category scoring.

Score
Kicks
Marks
Handballs
Hit Outs
Tackles
Spoils
Contested Marks
Clearances

We operate as a “dynasty” league that mirrors the AFL. with squads of 44.

Rules: We Follow the functions allowed on the website. No tanking lol.


Confirmed coaches

Zim^zuM Lolern Bulldogs
Wise Guy Sam Boston Terriers
flaps Wanderers
Northern Dogs Puppy Power 3
Matthew Jelley Knights of the Forbidden Category KOTFC
Jeremias Jeremias
clivenator26 Days of our Clive’s
Citizen Erazed Pink Pigs
deeman87 Cape York Crocodiles
weltschmerz Broady Bin Chickens
Barrybran Excelerators
Bowski Rushall Mews
Deadly Darcy Five Angry Marmosets
Cro19 Cro19

 

[Zim^zuM]

.

 

[Barrybran]

As much as leagues are customisable, is there a popular format out there that people use? We don't have to reinvent the wheel.

That said, I've had a look at the rankings and they look pretty good. Mids could possibly use a minor adjustment so more float to the top but I think the KPP's are about right relative to other FWD/DEF.

 

[deeman87]

As much as leagues are customisable, is there a popular format out there that people use? We don't have to reinvent the wheel.

That said, I've had a look at the rankings and they look pretty good. Mids could possibly use a minor adjustment so more float to the top but I think the KPP's are about right relative to other FWD/DEF.

There def is but were going off course a little coz were already in 2 leagues with standard settongs lol. Plus standard settings is free kicks and those cats blow

 

[Zim^zuM]

As much as leagues are customisable, is there a popular format out there that people use? We don't have to reinvent the wheel.

That said, I've had a look at the rankings and they look pretty good. Mids could possibly use a minor adjustment so more float to the top but I think the KPP's are about right relative to other FWD/DEF.

Perhaps standard scoring with key positions could be an option? Makes them relevant Because we all need to start them

 

[Northern Dogs]

Maybe add goal assists to poll too Zim^zuM though i think i prefer it without it. Currently poll has it as

kicks
tackles
hb
marks
tackles
score
dis eff %
spoils
hitouts

Tackles in twice?

 

[deeman87]

.

not sure we should go down that road but we could do 2 key fwds are backs and 4 normal fwds and backs

 

[deeman87]

Tackles in twice?

my bad

 

[Northern Dogs]

not sure we should go down that road but we could do 2 key fwds are backs and 4 normal fwds and backs

Makes it a bit difficult to define key fwds and backs when keeper platform doesn't
separate them

 

[deeman87]

Makes it a bit difficult to define key feds and backs when keeper platform doesn't s
Separate them

thats just it we just discovered theres a mode were it does split them

 

[Northern Dogs]

Sorry, didn't realise that.

 

[deeman87]

So i propose this, instead of 6 fwds and backs we make it 2 key fwds, 2 key backs, 4 other fwds & backs (assuming u could play more key positions here if u wanted but they can be any back or fwd) then we do the cats as the voting shows above so

Score
kicks
HB
tackles
marks
hitouts
Disp eff %
spoils
and 1 of goal assists, clearances or contested marks to make it an odd number

 

[clivenator26]

Tackles in twice?

It’s all about second efforts!

 

[Zim^zuM]

Sorry, didn't realise that.

Check screen shots

 

[deeman87]

We gotta check whether we can use key fwd mode with free version of keeper.

 

[clivenator26]

So i propose this, instead of 6 fwds and backs we make it 2 key fwds, 2 key backs, 4 other fwds & backs (assuming u could play more key positions here if u wanted but they can be any back or fwd) then we do the cats as the voting shows above so

Score
kicks
HB
tackles
marks
hitouts
Disp eff %
spoils
and 1 of goal assists, clearances or contested marks to make it an odd number

This will do.

I reckon it’s time to vote, get the best 3 suggestions and then work from there.

I think putting key backs and fwds in is too much, for now anyway.

 

[Zim^zuM]

So i propose this, instead of 6 fwds and backs we make it 2 key fwds, 2 key backs, 4 other fwds & backs (assuming u could play more key positions here if u wanted but they can be any back or fwd) then we do the cats as the voting shows above so

Score
kicks
HB
tackles
marks
hitouts
Disp eff %
spoils
and 1 of goal assists, clearances or contested marks to make it an odd number

I think if we were to have key positions I'd be careful in having stats that favour them when we would only play 2 defs and fwds

 

[deeman87]

I think if we were to have key positions I'd be careful in having stats that favour them when we would only play 2 defs and fwds

Okay so no spoils and just have 7 cats? It's possible this is just getting more confusing this way.

I think we almost have the cats, from what I can see there's some pretty clear 8 cats then after that it's not clear what the 9th cat would be.

 

[Citizen Erazed]

Key positions? Josh Treacy back to #1

 

[deeman87]

OK so no key positions and let's just finish the poll. We need a 9th cat and then we're good to go

 

[clivenator26]

The current 8 most popular cats is the way to go and then maybe make score worth 1.5?

 

[Citizen Erazed]

While we're at it, can I have a better pick?

 

[deeman87]

The current 8 most popular cats is the way to go and then maybe make score worth 1.5?

We could absolutely do that but that's on the poll and clearances currently has more votes than it. Let's wait for the other coaches to do the poll.

 

[deeman87]

While we're at it, can I have a better pick?

Hehe we haven't done the RNG roll for draft order yet.

 

[deeman87]

Nthn like a poll to settle arguments lol

 

[Citizen Erazed]

Hehe we haven't done the RNG roll for draft order yet.

Was just joking. Happy to let the site decide randomly.