38 list would be better with 16 teams..16 x 44 is 704 players allocated though. Good drafting after year 1 would be critical.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
38 list would be better with 16 teams..16 x 44 is 704 players allocated though. Good drafting after year 1 would be critical.
38 list would be better with 16 teams..
While I'd also like to have two divisions, the issue post-draft becomes that the same free agents are available in both leagues.To me the beauty of the new site is letting it do the work for us to make it easy to join another comp
If manual work was then created on top it takes that away, but if someone is committed to make it work I do like the idea of 2 divisions
Would mean someone has to be available to do manual google work. Then they have a kid and we are screwed IMOWhile I'd also like to have two divisions, the issue post-draft becomes that the same free agents are available in both leagues.
So throughout the year, those players will be added/dropped, etc. And by the end of the year, two teams going up or down can't have those same players on lists the following year.
The only ways around it that I can think of:
- No free agents are allowed to be picked at all each year.
- If any free agent is picked up that year, they go back into the draft pool the year after for all.
- Some kind of priority system that a lower team from div 2 gets the waiver instead of div 1 by the end of that season.
There's probably loopholes and asterisks in this somewhere, which is kinda why I think it's best to avoid something that has problems before we've even made a keeper league.
No, before they have the kid is when they are screwed. (Sorry everyone, I couldn't resist it!)Would mean someone has to be available to do manual google work. Then they have a kid and we are screwed IMO
I think what everyone is in agreeance is that we want something different to BDFL and PRC.
Just an idea, but could we look at something like have lists of 40, but only keep 30, so something.
Would mean the draft is a bit bigger each year but it opens up regeneration of team lists sooner in a way and reduces dominance from a handful of teams.
Look at the sticky threads in this subsectionI don’t know what BDFL and PRC are.
We could look at bigger lists, I’m a fan of deep leagues, but it’d kill off the promotion and relegation aspect.
BFDL = Bigfooty Dynasty LeagueI don’t know what BDFL and PRC are.
We could look at bigger lists, I’m a fan of deep leagues, but it’d kill off the promotion and relegation aspect.
Just had a thought:
Promotion/relegation can work … but if you get relegated from Div 1, you have to take over the team from Div 2. And vice versa.
Which makes it a new challenge in itself.
Which means both competitions can run a full draft and free agents, but those lists will always remain in their own division.
I guess that's the fun of it?Not sure you’ll get the long term buy in for that. Makes it hard to be invested in building a list if you might lose it. Also the worst list in the top league and best list in the lower league might have those same two coaches ping-ponging up and down.
Is it possible to lock all waivers?the main issues with two divisions are?
- draft?
- free agents?
- trades?
draft we can do offline. It will be a bit of a pain when it will show players available on the Keeper site that are not available, but nothing somebody with half a brain can work out.
weekly free agents can be abolished and replaced with a midseason draft - again, done off-line.
trades across divisions will need to be processed manually, but given how easy it is to add players to a squad this won't be an issue..
An issue is the recording of the allocation of draft picks traded across divisions.. that is slightly more tricky, one, but something we have been doing in BFDL for 10 years anyway (for future draft picks)..
any other obvious issues that will be problematic?
It is good to throw up ideas, but if it is only div 1 and div 2 in name only, I don't really get the appeal. who would want to give up a great team to have a shite team in what could be potentially a much weaker league, as there is a 50/50 chance that div 2 will be the better league of the two anyway.Just had a thought:
Promotion/relegation can work … but if you get relegated from Div 1, you have to take over the team from Div 2. And vice versa.
Which makes it a new challenge in itself.
Which means both competitions can run a full draft and free agents, but those lists will always remain in their own division.
As I've said it's amazing in theory, the reality is it's a pain unless a website has that function. Even if we have a Google sheet master, if life eventually gets in the way we are screwed.It is good to throw up ideas, but if it is only div 1 and div 2 in name only, I don't really get the appeal. who would want to give up a great team to have a shite team in what could be potentially a much weaker league, as there is a 50/50 chance that div 2 will be the better league of the two anyway.
yeah no worries. I don't think it is too much of a pain in the grand scheme of things, but I know it is not what you were thinking of when you asked for expressions of interest in a new leagueAs I've said it's amazing in theory, the reality is it's a pain unless a website has that function. Even if we have a Google sheet master, if life eventually gets in the way we are screwed.
My view is one league and start taking categories.
I'd like to add a few new categories and potentially have goals/score weighted more than disposals.
Adding in anything that gives KPD (spoils/1%ers) and KPF (goals/marks/score assists) over the usual stats is welcome in my eyes.As I've said it's amazing in theory, the reality is it's a pain unless a website has that function. Even if we have a Google sheet master, if life eventually gets in the way we are screwed.
My view is one league and start taking categories.
I'd like to add a few new categories and potentially have goals/score weighted more than disposals.