- Jul 9, 2016
- 1,105
- 1,324
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
For 14 coachesCheck my post on pg 6.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 14 coachesCheck my post on pg 6.
I do like contested marks as these are more valuable than the piddly keepings off type marks at the end of 4th quarter. But I'll go with the flow.i kinda like accuracy but we could. Of the other cats, i see One percenters is the one i like the most, or we could add clearances and put contested marks back in. Will let the rest of the league weigh in.
I mean we dont have to get rid of it,I do like contested marks as these are more valuable than the piddly keepings off type marks at the end of 4th quarter. But I'll go with the flow.
oh yep goal assists is another good one, we could add all of themHow many cats is too much?
Clearances will bring mids back up, goal assists would help small forwards, key forwards and some for mids and one percenters weights towards Defenders
Interested how that looks
I do like this. At present we are weighted heavily towards key forwards (who thinks Treacy should be ranked number 1?).How many cats is too much?
Clearances will bring mids back up, goal assists would help small forwards, key forwards and some for mids and one percenters weights towards Defenders
Interested how that looks
I'd say it's more the algorithm for rankings needs fine tuning. We know the game well. We still know someone like bont contributing highly towards 5 categories is going to be more valuable than TreacyI do like this. At present we are weighted heavily towards key forwards (who thinks Treacy should be ranked number 1?).
Yeah I feel simply adding clearances might do the trick lifting mids a bit. Might bump Luke Ryan down a bit too hahaHow many cats is too much?
Clearances will bring mids back up, goal assists would help small forwards, key forwards and some for mids and one percenters weights towards Defenders
Interested how that looks
Yeah I feel simply adding clearances might do the trick lifting mids a bit. Might bump Luke Ryan down a bit too haha
Yeah, I'm keen.
Done, player list has shifted a bit. Bont #1Ok so lets try adding all of contested marks, goal assists, one percenters & clearances and see how that looks? Or just contested marks and clearances? I'm not sure if lots of stats I'd a bad idea because it gets rly difficult to follow the match ups but it does make team building a lot more interesting.
Looks good enough to me. Yes there might be random but we need to remember having Treacy doesn't mean you have some hudge edge. And if u load up on key forwards you'll be losing too many stats to be the top teamDone, player list has shifted a bit. Bont #1
Also happy with player list. Looks much better.Looks good enough to me. Yes there might be random but we need to remember having Treacy doesn't mean you have some hudge edge. And if u load up on key forwards you'll be losing too many stats to be the top team
My logo is designed to look like a shieldEveryone is required to have some kind of team logo
Cool so are we happy with the stats as is? Didnt realise how few goal assists players actually got. Drafting gonna be hella difficult with this many cats but someone will do it better than the rest like any draft lol.Done, player list has shifted a bit. Bont #1
That seems like good weighting. Good stuff adding that upQuick stats. Players per position total rank inside the top 150 (based on the selected stats)
BACKS - 51
MIDS - 47
RUCKS - 17
FORWARDS - 47
Yes I am aware that does not add up to 150, as the DPPs come up in both their categories. But that seems pretty bloody evenly grouped.