League Cup League Cup 2024/25 (Semi Finals) - On BeIN Sports

League Cup

Remove this Banner Ad

It didn't wind me up, as I don't support either of the teams you've taken a dig at in your last two posts. Was just an observation. This response does nothing to change my perception.
I've never even noticed you but I can try to cater to your more sensitive sensibilities.

I'm a Liverpool supporter. We've had a good season but are hardly world beaters. I'll try to be a bit more one-eyed, so that you, a Hull supporter, does not get triggered.
 
Yeah big time, I'm absolutely reeling from your nonsensical call out.

If you're resorting to "LOL triggered!!" it's clear there's not a lot of substance behind your thoughts.
Isn't that what you've now done in multiple posts trying to mock my supposed sensitivity?

I've just noticed you winding up Moomba and now taking shots at spurs about their luck. It was a one off observation you've now turned into a multi post whinge.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Ok precious whatever makes you feel better after you've made a fool of yourself.

I'll happily go along to placate yourself so you can move on.
Oh look some name calling. You OK? You've been well off it lately.
 
Well no it doesnt, the ball is played down the left where Tsimikas should have been but was not on the pitch because of the tackle. Konate doesnt need to cover the run and come across leaving oceans of space. Even if it plays out that Dom beats Tsimi and puts the ball in to the middle, now we have Konate there instead of absolutely nobody.
I'm not saying the tackle never happened.

I'm saying it happened and Bergvall and Tsimikas are both off the field. It plays out the same. Dom v Konate still happens. And instead of Bergvall running onto it, Bissouma or Kulu run onto it. As mad as it sounds, its just the way we play that Ange would be expected the same run to happen if we are down to 10
 
Isn't that what you've now done in multiple posts trying to mock my supposed sensitivity?

I've just noticed you winding up Moomba and now taking shots at spurs about their luck. It was a one off observation you've now turned into a multi post whinge.
Looks like a whole lot of observing and then a snipe, as opposed to simply discussing football (which is what I did in each instance). I'm perfectly fine with people disagreeing with the football points I raise and replying with their own point of view.

The irony of you somehow labelling this as a whinge by me, when it was you that whinged about me winding up every supporter base, I'm sure has escaped you.
 
See this is nothing to do with football and all to do with trying to trigger someone. Quite hypocritical.
Yeah OK. I'm trying to trigger him.
 
Yeah OK. I'm trying to trigger him.
I mean I'm happy to focus on what offended you.

For reference, my "scathing" comment on Spurs: "Wonder if Spurs are happy to take a draw and play on the counter at Anfield. A more pragmatic side of Ange perhaps."

My "unbelievable attack" on Man City: an acknowledgement that Pep had made positive changes, found his best lineup (accounting for injuries) and fluency was returning.

The SM interpretation: GEEZ MAN, you really are trying to troll everyone, aren't you?

It doesn't make much sense so I'm happy to put this down to a comprehension issue.
 
Not overly surprised as this is the time of year our squad depth or lack of it is tested. Well done to Spurs and Ang.

Spurs may have injuries but fresh legs at this time of the season is gold.

At some point Salah, Grav, Macca all need a break.

We really should be investing in our squad, instead we are struggling to retain players and the old "are fsg going to sell" conveniently emerges again in another transfer window.

Fsg have done a great job in appointing managers. However, their lack of investment in the squad is disappointing.
 
I mean I'm happy to focus on what offended you.

For reference, my "scathing" comment on Spurs: "Wonder if Spurs are happy to take a draw and play on the counter at Anfield. A more pragmatic side of Ange perhaps."

My "unbelievable attack" on Man City: an acknowledgement that Pep had made positive changes, found his best lineup (accounting for injuries) and fluency was returning.

The SM interpretation: GEEZ MAN, you really are trying to troll everyone, aren't you?

It doesn't make much sense so I'm happy to put this down to a comprehension issue.
That wasn't the spurs comment I was referring to but the fact you're still going on about this is pretty weird. You've even had to reply to an unrelated post to continue because I didn't engage.
 
Was 100% certain Bergvall was gonna be sent off. It was a yellow card challenge for sure and definitely a bit unlucky for Liverpool but the offside was a bees dick as well and at least now the second legs still wide open even though I fully expect Liverpool to get it done. Can only hope Liverpool aren't as worried about it because of the league and CL
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yeah big time, I'm absolutely reeling from your nonsensical call out.

If you're resorting to "LOL triggered!!" it's clear there's not a lot of substance behind your thoughts.
first time GIF
 
I'm not saying the tackle never happened.

I'm saying it happened and Bergvall and Tsimikas are both off the field. It plays out the same. Dom v Konate still happens. And instead of Bergvall running onto it, Bissouma or Kulu run onto it. As mad as it sounds, its just the way we play that Ange would be expected the same run to happen if we are down to 10
Nah I dont think that's how it works. You cant turn one player into two. Bissouma and Kulu were where they were when it was happening. You cant just assume they suddenly make the exact same run that Bergvall did because Bergvall is off the pitch.
 
Nah I dont think that's how it works. You cant turn one player into two. Bissouma and Kulu were where they were when it was happening. You cant just assume they suddenly make the exact same run that Bergvall did because Bergvall is off the pitch.
That's exactly what Ange would be wanting 1 of them to do. Bergvall going off as our attacking CM making late runs, would mean 1 of the others picks up that role and forgoes some of their other responsibilities. It seems mad and often is the case. But us losing a man wouldn't see us play in an attacking way any differently.

Now, could the other option be technically as good as Bergvall was there? Probably not. But the chance is created regardless of a 2nd yellow or not.
 
Is this a FIFA rule or an English competition rule?
Not sure. Sounds like current English interpretation passed on to managers/coaches
 
What the hell happened to him?
I can only assume that he copped a head knock just prior to this, was a bit wobbly on his feet, then hit the deck completely trying that diving header

Seems like he's okay. Awake in hospital, talking and giving thumbs up on social media
 
That's exactly what Ange would be wanting 1 of them to do. Bergvall going off as our attacking CM making late runs, would mean 1 of the others picks up that role and forgoes some of their other responsibilities. It seems mad and often is the case. But us losing a man wouldn't see us play in an attacking way any differently.

Now, could the other option be technically as good as Bergvall was there? Probably not. But the chance is created regardless of a 2nd yellow or not.
I mean it isnt because of the old if a butterfly flaps its wings etc...

Bergvall going off means players will be in different positions, is Tsimikas back on the pitch, if so Konate doesnt come across. If fact the same ball is played.

Nothing would have been the same.
 
Am I right to say that in the situation where a second yellow should be given that the instruction to refs is that advantage shouldn't be played?
Would a ref be able to pick out in that second a player is already on a yellow? Then there would be situations where there is a genuine goal scoring chance that it would be stopping

The instruction to refs is just dumb. It is not like this is one time thing I've posted about this numerous times in match threads in the last couple of months
 
Would a ref be able to pick out in that second a player is already on a yellow? Then there would be situations where there is a genuine goal scoring chance that it would be stopping

The instruction to refs is just dumb. It is not like this is one time thing I've posted about this numerous times in match threads in the last couple of months
I agree it's dumb but (rightly or wrongly) I presumed that once the advantage was given that the ref wouldn't be able to go back and give a second yellow.

If he hadn't been booked, the ref would be able to play advantage and then go back and book the player.

Like you said though, dumb if that is the case.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

League Cup League Cup 2024/25 (Semi Finals) - On BeIN Sports

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top