- Banned
- #1
isn't that substantial evidence that martin bryant didn't kill those people and was a scapegoat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
isn't that substantial evidence that martin bryant didn't kill those people and was a scapegoat?
isn't that substantial evidence that martin bryant didn't kill those people and was a scapegoat?
amazing how every brave decision the government makes is dumb.
isn't that substantial evidence that martin bryant didn't kill those people and was a scapegoat?
The conspiracy theories are ******* great, considering a whole lot of people saw him do it, and he's on film holed up in the B&B.
If you put stock in the Port Arthur conspiracy theories, you need your head examined, and are a good argument against allowing widespread gun ownership in the general population.
Especially the fact that a slow-witted man with barely any gun experience had such a high kill-rate.
so it's impossible for an idiot to aim a gun at a crowded place and pull a trigger?
As long as you ignore the eye witnesses and footage of him doing it.
Even then he chased the little girls into the bush and shot them from less then 2 metres.I thought that most of the shootings were point blank apart from when he was in the bus/car park.
A tin foil hat picture would be perfectly reasonable in this caseA predictably generic, closed minded response. I'm surprised you didn't wheel out the tin foil hat picture.
The Port Arthur Massacre raises many questions that have never been properly answered.
Those conspiracy 'theories' is the stuff of complete morons and frankly are very disrespectful to the people that witnessed the murders and those that lost their lives.
The government didn't arrange to kill 35 people, including children, to ram through gun reforms that the general population didn't even give a shit about.
30 hits and 20 kills from 29 bullets in 90 seconds?
Yes.
As long as you ignore the eye witnesses and footage of him doing it.
Other then that its a great read.
When one is firing a SKS 7.62mm semi automatic in a crowded cafe against unsuspecting pensioners having a cup of coffee, yes.
Shit, you could gun down 2 a second in the first 10 seconds before they knew what was happening.
Im not sure those commenting on this know what guns do.
When one is firing a SKS 7.62mm semi automatic in a crowded cafe against unsuspecting pensioners having a cup of coffee, yes.
Shit, you could gun down 2 a second in the first 10 seconds before they knew what was happening.
Im not sure those commenting on this know what guns do.
The best word to descrive people who buy into the conspiracy theory is a banned word unfortunately.One doesn't need to be a marksman to shoot surprised flatfooted people at point blank range.
Shit; for the first 5-6 seconds most wouldn't have been able to comprehend what the **** was going down. Im a trained solder and It'd take me 5 seconds to realize what was happening and react. By then, he'd be changing his first 20 round magazine.
And were still at 10-15 feet and sitting down.
Makes it even more horrible.
I cant even imagine the horror.
Seriously, there is no doubt he did it. Witnesses, survivors, guns, ballistics, hard factual evidence, the works. The fact some people even think about thinking about buying into the story he didnt is... well... weird.
Der government trying to take away our gunz.
Derp.
Just because I said it was a good read doesn't mean I believe it.zacmac isn't very smart but i'm sure you've realized that by now.