Purple7x08_24
President: Galactic Federation
Its a mess. If we are accepting the tackles are wrong its 1 week for the tackles and 3 for Davies. 2-3 for the elbowGrading Davies in the same light as Bedford - 3 weeks - is hilarious.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Its a mess. If we are accepting the tackles are wrong its 1 week for the tackles and 3 for Davies. 2-3 for the elbowGrading Davies in the same light as Bedford - 3 weeks - is hilarious.
Not at all.. if the player is carrying the ball in one arm the tackle needs to hold him and pin the other arm.This is a severely dramatic response.
See Jon Ralph’s tweets for context.
The tackle isn’t going anywhere. Just don’t pin the arms & slam them.
James Sicily last year did....Will never happen. The AFL will manufacture the result they want and that will be the one that maximises revenue.
A Victorian player wouldn't be copping a 3 week ban for those tackles.
The state athletic commissions have though. Suspensions of 3+ months for fighters who have been knocked out.Why the fk are the AFL so anal about concussions?
The UFC for example hasn't introduced any changes to concussion protocols.
In fact, Dana White recently introduced Slap Fighting which is like the most concussion heavy sport the world has ever seen.
It's actually closer to Cam Rayners at the Gabba on the cricket pitch where the AFL stated something along the lines of Rayner should have known where the cricket pitch was and adjusted his tackling accordingly.Sounds like Sicily last year (not an elimination final but the tackle and winning the free)
Both Cameron and Elliot Yeo have said that force going backwards that everyone is calling the driving action from Cameron was due to Duggan trying to get out of the tackle.I feel like the Cameron tackle is easily avoided by the knowledge that the ball up whistle is coming. Cameron didn’t need to drive him. Was it terrible? No. But to me I thought it was the sort of forceful action the AFL are trying to avoid by tweaking the HTB & ball-up whistle. So I don’t have as much problem with that outcome. 3 weeks is harsh and is based purely on a concussion occurring, I’d prefer the action (standing & then driving) to be a week and remove the fact that the head hit the turf from the penalty.
Not sure outside of injury how Bedfords tackle was any different to Dangerfield. 3 v 0. Both chase down tackles with the tackles player falling forwards. Concussion v no concussion. Are we really arguing one tackle is dangerous & one isn’t Because one player got concussed & one player only got his brain rattled slightly ?
And neither tackle was still as dangerous as Maynard’s sling on Powell but because Powells head didn’t hit the ground (good fortune, not good skill) it wasn’t even cited.
Neither player suspended slammed their opponent......This is a severely dramatic response.
See Jon Ralph’s tweets for context.
The tackle isn’t going anywhere. Just don’t pin the arms & slam them.
Davies was contesting a loose ball and did not elect to bump. Not sure why that is worth 3. Port also argued that he didn't elect to bump and was contesting a loose ball as is his right.Its a mess. If we are accepting the tackles are wrong its 1 week for the tackles and 3 for Davies. 2-3 for the elbow
Why the fk are the AFL so anal about concussions?
The UFC for example hasn't introduced any changes to concussion protocols.
In fact, Dana White recently introduced Slap Fighting which is like the most concussion heavy sport the world has ever seen.
Davies was contesting a loose ball and did not elect to bump. Not sure why that is worth 3. Port also argued that he didn't elect to bump and was contesting a loose ball as is his right.
I don’t recall so many blokes getting hurt in tackles 20 years ago
Is this a new phenomenon? And an unforeseen result of other rule changes? Players are very good now at standing in a tackle & still disposing of the ball
I don’t have a problem with the Cameron one, definitely looked like some malice & intention to injure. Always thought Cameron an A grade sniper
Bedford one looked accidental, just momentum, very unlucky
I guess the takeaway is if you tackle vigorously & concuss your opponent you are done. Similar to bumping. I don’t have a problem with it so long as it is applied consistently
The ugliest action of the weekend received the lightest sentence, which is ironic
It wont be long and a player will go in for a tackle. There will be a head knock. Player suspended for 3 weeks. AFL tell player he should have anticipated the head contact in the moment and turned his body.
IT will happen.
Laura Kane, who never even played the game is single handedly destroying it.
Thats what happens when you gift people jobs.
It wasn't that bad but it was careless. A.D had to be more aware in that situationThe Davies one is horribly dangerous it’s the exact action we don’t need player over the ball needs protection. Gone are the Bryon Pickett days
This is a severely dramatic response.
See Jon Ralph’s tweets for context.
The tackle isn’t going anywhere. Just don’t pin the arms & slam them.
If the AFL wants less concussions they can easily fix it by bringing in zones, AND OR reducing player numbers to 16 to remove the fast play and the congestion.The concussion warriors will come out and say that 20 years ago they were all getting concussed yet not being diagnosed.
Go back to the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s and there was no more violent time in the sport. They all seemed ok though.
This is not evolving, this is changing the sport.
Collingwood players have been training different methods for tackling. I've seen rolling, pulling them backwards, and then Maynard just picked someone up.There is no point in tackling if you are not pinning the arms. The whole point is to tackle so they can’t dispose of it.
It wasn't that bad but it was careless. A.D had to be more aware in that situation
If the AFL wants less concussions they can easily fix it by bringing in zones, AND OR reducing player numbers to 16 to remove the fast play and the congestion.
Collingwood players have been training different methods for tackling. I've seen rolling, pulling them backwards, and then Maynard just picked someone up.
At the end of the day there's always the potential for injury.
You're better off attending and holding up a placard to the effect of "GAGF AFL" - which the AFL will see as a compliment, believing it to mean "Giving Astutely Good Findings"I'll not be attending this weeks game in protest of these garbage new tackling rule interpretations. It has the same stench & hallmarks of the 'Umpire Dissent' crisis a couple of years back, when players were copping 50m penalties for simply putting their arms out to question a decision. Andrew Dillon and his cohorts need to pull their head's right in again.
*big Victorian club.James Sicily last year did....
James Sicily last year did....