![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/west_coast.png)
Barrybran
Premium Platinum
- Jun 18, 2016
- 53,379
- 101,850
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth Scorchers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney Swans vs GWS Giants - 3:20PM Sat - 1st QF
Squiggle tips Swans at 63% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
LIVE: Brisbane Lions vs Carlton - 7:30PM Sat - 1st EF
Squiggle tips Lions at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why can't GWS lawyer just repeat what was said in Cameron's defense?
Only guideline considered, overlooked whether the action / conduct is likely to cause injury.
Bedford is like a 101 tackle they'll see countless times in a weekend. Too bad Taranto's head got hit on the ground but that's not the likely outcome every single time.
So he got off on a technicality.
So he did slam him but got off on a technicality. I am more confused than ever now.can't keep a Good Bloke down !
Get around Charlie !
So he did slam him but got off on a technicality. I am more confused than ever now.
So he did slam him but got off on a technicality. I am more confused than ever now.
From my understanding.So he got off on a technicality.
So he got off on a technicality.
Cripps is not a dirty player, and Cameron is one of the dirtiest in the AFL at the moment.
He did slam, he was charged and suspended for a slam, he got off on a technicality.Like I said earlier, there is no "slam". Charlie is bearhugging Duggan and Duggan is turning, leaning back, trying to pull away. Once they both lost footing, injury could've gone either way.
Exactly what ex-players, commentators, people who've played the game at the top level have been saying in tv, talkback for last 2 days.
lol just keep arguing until the tribunal chair gives you a little nod
He did slam, he was charged and suspended for a slam, he got off on a technicality.
You got it wrong.
Move on.
There was 100% malice in that tackle, he was pissy Duggan cleaned him up earlier in the game. Was worth a week at least imo.
Sounds like you could sit on an AFL tribunal. "This is what it is coz I said so".He did slam, he was charged and suspended for a slam, he got off on a technicality.
You got it wrong.
Move on.
What waste of time and money …. The good guys win …. And Brisbane
He was suspended for the concussion Duggan got during a legal, but not dangerous tackle.He did slam, he was charged and suspended for a slam, he got off on a technicality.
You got it wrong.
Move on.