- Jun 3, 2014
- 8,346
- 10,306
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- QLDer
It’s unreal how overrated Puma are.Rumour on Carlton board that Blues with Puma from 2020....
Plzzzzz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It’s unreal how overrated Puma are.Rumour on Carlton board that Blues with Puma from 2020....
Plzzzzz
Sounds like something someone who isn't with Puma would sayIt’s unreal how overrated Puma are.
Hawks/Brisbane both had Puma in the past, and cannot wait for Arsenal to ditch them at the end of this season. Shit brand.Sounds like something someone who isn't with Puma would say
It’s unreal how overrated Puma are.
Any brand churning out this tosh is not solid gold IMO
View attachment 597103
View attachment 597105
How is it different from 2018?Zurich box is printed in now too instead of being removed and having only the white Zurich writing
View attachment 596933
♤
How is it different from 2018?
Dees guernseys the same, except no MCC logo on the back.
Interesting that the tag had 'Colour: Blue' on it, not navy. I'm not sure what the 2018 guernseys had, but, you'd think if there were 2 blue guernseys, you'd say Navy and Royal?
We didn't sell 2018 Melbourne guernseys to compare, so I'm not sure.Doesn’t the MCC logo only appear on PI’s?
No iSelect on our polos either, can't remember what was on the back of the guernsey. I'll look tonight.Are iSelect still Melbourne's back sponsor? There was an article with Gary Pert in the Herald Sun the other day with the image of him in a club polo- only Zurich logo no iSelect.
Look, after having Richmond guernseys in my hands all day yesterday, I would very much prefer a Carlton guernsey with Puma. The black is actually black, the template and fit is all class, and it feels good. As long as they raise the CFC, I'll be very happy.It’s unreal how overrated Puma are.
Look, after having Richmond guernseys in my hands all day yesterday, I would very much prefer a Carlton guernsey with Puma. The black is actually black, the template and fit is all class, and it feels good. As long as they raise the CFC, I'll be very happy.
You'd think so, but Nike started off like that too.I have no doubt Puma would do it. They seemed very keen to accommodate Richmond's request for bright yellow, and with the extra revenue and exposure to be had by signing another AFL club, I think they would be more than happy to help out
Are iSelect still Melbourne's back sponsor? There was an article with Gary Pert in the Herald Sun the other day with the image of him in a club polo- only Zurich logo no iSelect.
iSelect's deal finished up this year, so they won't be on the back.We didn't sell 2018 Melbourne guernseys to compare, so I'm not sure.
The freakin' beanie kids have it though
No iSelect on our polos either, can't remember what was on the back of the guernsey. I'll look tonight.
Any brand churning out this tosh is not solid gold IMO
View attachment 597103
View attachment 597105
it sure does. what's your opinion on the isc vs puma debate?Boundary first ball of the over in the last 4 overs hurts
I’ve got two tabs open, thought I was in the Big Bash thread it sure does. what's your opinion on the isc vs puma debate?
I rate this concept.
What's wrong with ISC?ISC is absolute trash, best manufacturers are Puma>Adidas.
Theyve been with Port for 5 or 6 years now and I cant fault them. Guernseys are good polos are good I got a training singlet a few years ago and that was good. I dunno about their jackets and cold weather gear because I dont have any of that.What's wrong with ISC?