Umpiring North v Pies R14 - Should have been 50m ?

[Wosh]

https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/fans-fume-as-north-melbourne-denied-late-shot-on-goal-by-umpiring-howler/news-story/c068262109be5ac0f6fe2eb3cb44db3b

 

[Smotie2]

That was baffling the umpire calls HTB then gives advantage to the pies.

And they just let it run for like 15-20 secs.
It was like they assumed "North are shit must be advantage to the Pies"

And no 50 for north.

 

[DoubleO7]

Laura Kane is a Muppet.
Has lost all credibility.

Everyone except the most one eyed Pies fan knows it was textbook 50m pen.

If North had of done that exact thing in the last min of the game the umpires would have glady and instantly blown the whistle to give the Pies a shot to win.

How come nobody is talking about the fact some norf spud is allowed to have GOAT in a full nelson wrestling hold before the ball even arrives and no free? Collingwood should have had a lot more frees.

View attachment 2023696

Daicos gets tackled without taking possession of the ball...

 

[HairyO]

View attachment 2023773
Daicos gets tackled without taking possession of the ball...

Yeah that still frame shows a far greater travesty than the numerous complete **** ups by the umpires which helped Collingwood.

Are you lot so desperate for people to think you arent just an average team that you go out of your way looking for nitpick issues to gloss over the huge errors?

To the point you wont even qcknowledge they were errors?

Quickly replacing Essendon supporters who think Hird did no wrong for the most head ****ed.

 

[Maze]

You have it wrong.

Laura kane said that daicos was actually blocking the north player and he is the one who should have been penalised.
Also went into something about an affiliation with Collingwood for retirement funding for select AFL staff and umpires.

Ha, nice try, but complete rubbish. 1. You are allowed to protect the drop of the ball area provided you contesting the ball and don't push in the back. This is a free to the held player 100 times out of 100

 

[Duckimus Prime]

How come nobody is talking about the fact some norf spud is allowed to have GOAT in a full nelson wrestling hold before the ball even arrives and no free? Collingwood should have had a lot more frees.

View attachment 2023696

Daicos is actually holding onto Shiels' arms here. He tries to kick the ball away, because if he goes for the mark then Shiels' arms will also be free to spoil/contest the mark. So instead he's playing for a holding free kic so he doesn't have to contest for a mark.

Also thats 3x Premiership Spud.

 

[JGreezy]

So, we have AFL coming out and saying that players are allowed to run over the mark, after a mark has been called, if they think that it should be play on. Even if play on isn't called.

Then she signed off on a goal review that was clearly touched.

And no mention of this obvious 50 that was on one of North's two free kicks for the half.



It's just embarrassing and insulting that the AFL don't just be honest and say that the umpires were bad.

 

[Smotie2]

So, we have AFL coming out and saying that players are allowed to run over the mark, after a mark has been called, if they think that it should be play on. Even if play on isn't called.

Then she signed off on a goal review that was clearly touched.

And no mention of this obvious 50 that was on one of North's two free kicks for the half.



It's just embarrassing and insulting that the AFL don't just be honest and say that the umpires were bad.

They won't admit the umpires were bad because they weren't bad they were totally corrupt in getting Collingwood over the line to play finals and finish top 4.

It's all about money.

If Collingwood don't finish top 4 it's 2 less games at the g in finals where they clean up with 90k crowds.

And in their opinion who gives a shit about north winning 1 more game if it means millions in the coffers.

 

[RHLK]

Yeah that still frame shows a far greater travesty than the numerous complete **** ups by the umpires which helped Collingwood.

Are you lot so desperate for people to think you arent just an average team that you go out of your way looking for nitpick issues to gloss over the huge errors?

To the point you wont even qcknowledge they were errors?

Quickly replacing Essendon supporters who think Hird did no wrong for the most head ****ed.

'Poor old Collingwood forever...'