- Aug 22, 2014
- 14,017
- 51,135
- AFL Club
- Carlton
That guy floats between reasonable posts and borderline trolling, but I don't see too much wrong with this one.
He's probably one of the few oppo posters who I reckon has come pretty close to the mark on the player contracts. The main one I'd disagree with is Cerra, who is supposedly closer to the $600k mark (and according to some, possibly under that).
The belief by some that we won't, or can't, lose some of our decent players along the way is just wishful thinking. The reality is that it's more likely to happen, than not happen. Not sure I agree that Harry will be the one we lose though, and I certainly don't think we are planning to let him go.
There's no way that we didn't plan Cripps, Walsh, Weiters, Charlie, etc, while factoring in Harry's next deal. The question will simply come down to whether Harry wants to chase a max deal, or fit in with the others and take unders to keep the core of the team together.
It's not an unreasonable post in my view.
That all sounds reasonable, until you consider that it still leaves 6-ish million between the other 33 players, a fair number of those being draftees, role players and rookies on $100-250k. Suspect most teams would have a similar profile - half the cap spent on the top dozen players, the rest of the list below the AFL average.
Reckon we're more likely to let guys like Fisher, Gov, Williams, Martin etc. go than we are to flip Harry.