Oppo Camp Other Clubs News/General Discussion

[jmac70]

I’d like to see Perryman come out and apologise publicly for not standing up to stop this appalling behaviour.

 

[slugger01]

Yeah but clearly it’s something that was in bad taste
And he’s guilty for being there and not stopping it like the others


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If having bad taste was punishable, we could get rid of all caaarrrllton supporters.

 

[whiteside35]

The way the AFL are going,players won't be able to speak,let alone have a drink anywhere.Someone somewhere might get offended.

 

[ElliottsMaggies]

If having bad taste was punishable, we could get rid of all caaarrrllton supporters.

I find the Hawthorn guernsey distasteful.

 

[Kes1984]

I find the Hawthorn guernsey distasteful.

Oh me too. It’s hideous!! Who thought that combo of colours was a good idea! Seriously

 

[sideswipe]

Pretty what?

Tolerant


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[sideswipe]

Upon reflection, I think the AFL got this wrong.

Any player who engages in demeaning acts towards women should be banned for life.

We live in a society where women are subjected to brutal rapes and murderer.

The only solution is to educate young men like this that simulating violence against a women is contemptible.

AFL should have gone even harder. Time to take a stance on violence against women.

Banned for life? Get a hold of yourself.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Kes1984]

I love Swanny

 

[jmac70]

Banned for life? Get a hold of yourself.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Yeah, it’s a big reaction. We have young men simulating violence against women.

It makes my stomach churn.

I have no tolerance

 

[slugger01]

Oh me too. It’s hideous!! Who thought that combo of colours was a good idea! Seriously

Oh, I don’t know.
It works well on some people..

 

[jmac70]

I love Swanny

I do too, but not that comment.

 

[Kes1984]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What’s the good in the media releasing actual details here.

To me the one that is distasteful is the twin towers.

 

[sideswipe]

Yeah, it’s a big reaction. We have young men simulating violence against women.

It makes my stomach churn.

I have no tolerance

And no perspective


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[jmac70]

What’s the good in the media releasing actual details here.

To me the one that is distasteful is the twin towers.

Details need to be public.
Hiding this behaviour is tolerating it

 

[jmac70]

And no perspective


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Enlighten me

 

[Kappa]

I’d like to see Perryman come out and apologise publicly for not standing up to stop this appalling behaviour.

Do you stand up to stop appalling behavior Jmac?

 

[Kes1984]

Details need to be public.
Hiding this behaviour is tolerating it

Private function. They weren’t doing this for people to see.

If they were doing this publicly, that would be entirely different.

Also you only focus on women this women that.

I think the 9/11 and slavery ones are striking me as the oddly inappropriate choices for humour here.

 

[ElliottsMaggies]

What’s the good in the media releasing actual details here.

To me the one that is distasteful is the twin towers.

Best they released the details because the rumours going around were totally bizarre..and now we find out most were (surprise, surprise) widely exaggerated.

Duncan & Bartel must be glad they played a few years ago.. remember when they dressed up as Nixon & the school girl at a Cat's Mad Monday?

Cornes defended Cat's yesterday saying they started the dress ups, always do it well & don't offend..

 

[Kes1984]

Best they released the details because the rumours going around were totally bizarre..and now we find out most were (surprise, surprise) widely exaggerated.

Duncan & Bartel must be glad they played a few years ago.. remember when they dressed up as Nixon & the school girl at a Cat's Mad Monday?

Cornes defended Cat's yesterday saying they started the dress ups, always do it well & don't offend..

Yes true. Reality actually isn’t as bad as what’s been suggested.

I just think what a strange party this was

 

[sideswipe]

Enlighten me

Proportionality a better description. You suggested removing a person’s livelihood as a penalty. That is ludicrous.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[manicpie]

Disgusting behaviour. Penalties are spot on.

I agree, when you've worked with victims of spousal abuse you get the real perspective of how damaging and degrading it is for the women involved. Not to mention any children that might be involved. Most never fully recover

 

[Jafo]

So, we might be missing Perryman round 1 or we thinking hefty fine?

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

So Perryman was one of the leaders fined for not doing anything about the stupidity?

Whatever

He’s on enough at Collingwood now where that fine is negligible

Pay it and forget his entire time at that club

 

[Kes1984]

I agree, when you've worked with victims of spousal abuse you get the real perspective of how damaging and degrading it is for the women involved. Not to mention any children that might be involved. Most never fully recover

No one here agrees what they did was right, I’m sure. But it was done privately. They didn’t intend for it to be out publicly causing offence. People probably do a lot of offensive behaviour in their own homes.

The suggestion that they be banned for life is a massive overreaction. Suspensions of weeks is even an overreaction in my opinion.

They were not doing this in front of people who have been victims (men are often victims of domestic abuse and have higher suicide rates, but I won’t start that debate). It also was not just about violence against women anyway. They mocked 9/11 and slavery too it seems.

Perhaps fines and a slap on the wrist to serve as a warning that they need to behave properly even in private events.

Not too different from being able to be reprimanded for bad behaviours at an after work function (it still counts as your employment).

 

[ElliottsMaggies]

So, we might be missing Perryman round 1 or we thinking hefty fine?

Why? He's been fined as part of being in Giants leadership group.

Has nothing to do with us. You want to punish him again?