He was fined only. No suspension.So, we might be missing Perryman round 1 or we thinking hefty fine?
Fined not for participation but for being a bystander to those who did participate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was fined only. No suspension.So, we might be missing Perryman round 1 or we thinking hefty fine?
The guy who copped the biggest suspension was because he humped an inflatable doll whilst dressed up as a rugby player who had a hung jury on a rape charge.Also you only focus on women this women that.
I think the 9/11 and slavery ones are striking me as the oddly inappropriate choices for humour here.
Perryman (and the other giants players) are not guilty of anything
See plenty worse in an R rated movie…
No children present, no video, no social media footage, no assaults or damage to property etc
Just a private function of adults who had abided by the laws of the state
As for whether it’s in bad taste… well that’s merely opinion
The players won’t… but I hope they challenge the fines and take it to court
The AFL would lose the case.
What about the people who work there?Private function. They weren’t doing this for people to see.
If they were doing this publicly, that would be entirely different.
Also you only focus on women this women that.
I think the 9/11 and slavery ones are striking me as the oddly inappropriate choices for humour here.
I have had a couple of jobs that the contract had clauses re the company and behaviour, not bringing it into disrepute.Perryman (and the other giants players) are not guilty of anything
See plenty worse in an R rated movie…
No children present, no video, no social media footage, no assaults or damage to property etc
Just a private function of adults who had abided by the laws of the state
As for whether it’s in bad taste… well that’s merely opinion
The players won’t… but I hope they challenge the fines and take it to court
The AFL would lose the case.
Perryman (and the other giants players) are not guilty of anything
See plenty worse in an R rated movie…
No children present, no video footage, no assault
Just a private function of adults abided by the laws of the state
As for whether it’s in bad taste… well that’s merely opinion
The players won’t but I hope they challenge the fines and take it to court
The AFL would lose the case
Fair enough.Proportionality a better description. You suggested removing a person’s livelihood as a penalty. That is ludicrous.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you a moron?Ah yes the old argument that women get murdered. Of course that happens but men also get murdered. They actually get murdered more than women. I know shock horror.
I don't think life bans are necessary. I do agree with the penalties that were handed out. The part that worries me is that the players wanted to reenact past rape convictions. I'm not a prune, I've been around but it's pretty sick shit that I would question any mate that wanted to do itNo one here agrees what they did was right, I’m sure. But it was done privately. They didn’t intend for it to be out publicly causing offence. People probably do a lot of offensive behaviour in their own homes.
The suggestion that they be banned for life is a massive overreaction. Suspensions of weeks is even an overreaction in my opinion.
They were not doing this in front of people who have been victims (men are often victims of domestic abuse and have higher suicide rates, but I won’t start that debate). It also was not just about violence against women anyway. They mocked 9/11 and slavery too it seems.
Perhaps fines and a slap on the wrist to serve as a warning that they need to behave properly even in private events.
Not too different from being able to be reprimanded for bad behaviours at an after work function (it still counts as your employment).
Oopsy. I thought they said $20k this morning. My bad.
Settle JMac.Upon reflection, I think the AFL got this wrong.
Any player who engages in demeaning acts towards women should be banned for life.
We live in a society where women are subjected to brutal rapes and murderer.
The only solution is to educate young men like this that simulating violence against a women is contemptible.
AFL should have gone even harder. Time to take a stance on violence against women.
I’d like to see Perryman come out and apologise publicly for not standing up and telling his captain to stop this appalling behaviour.
I just find it to be a really odd bunch of young blokes really. What a strange way to see out your footy year.The guy who copped the biggest suspension was because he humped an inflatable doll whilst dressed up as a rugby player who had a hung jury on a rape charge.
Not much would worry you if you were a prune ..I don't think life bans are necessary. I do agree with the penalties that were handed out. The part that worries me is that the players wanted to reenact past rape convictions. I'm not a prune, I've been around but it's pretty sick shit that I would question any mate that wanted to do it
He made a sign off video I think.Oh I didn’t know he was delisted. They need to keep him on in a media role. His videos are entertaining.
Now this is funnyNot much would worry you if you were a prune ..
Young blokes being outrageous as a shock joke is pretty normal.I just find it to be a really odd bunch of young blokes really. What a strange way to see out your footy year.
Don't worry, I'm second guessing every fkng comment in case I offend someoneNow this is funny
What the GWS blokes did isn’t. But maybe I just don’t get the humour of 20 something boys.
I’m sure you will. Can’t worry about that though.Don't worry, I'm second guessing every fkng comment in case I offend someone
Im offended, it reminds me of my ageing male body partsNot much would worry you if you were a prune ..