Banter TRTT Part 15: David KOCH on Epstein List!!!11!!!!!!

Remove this Banner Ad

What? No!

Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Rupert Murdoch, Marc Andreesen, Mark Zuckerberg, Gina Rinehart, Jeff Bezos and James Packer care about wealth inequality and the little guy!
AA1xEEJe.jpg
If this lady's **** cared about wealth inequality I'm sure they could lead these men to a fairer world for all
 
Americans must see tennis as similar to soccer - mainly a women's sport.
Poor analogy GD. US has won the most Grand Slam titles, double next best which is us, most Davis Cups and holds one of the 4 majors. They are the biggest tennis nation on earth. But considering the haven't had a great male player for 20 plus years, it's a bit off the radar as tennis doesn't fit the American Exceptionalism narrative at the moment.
 
Why didn't Joe Biden fix men's tennis? Seems like another thing for Trump to do! Make Tennis Great Again!

Step 1: Everyone has to wear Agassi's mullet wig.

brb packing bags moving to america to play tennis
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Who gives the minority groups voice? Who's driving these conversations? It's all propaganda to make us hate each other while the dollars created by the many flow into the hands of the few. You people on the right just scream and cry because Murdoch whispers the right words to you. It's honestly rather sad.
Minority groups have more say these days because every fk’d up group have more rights these days
It’s driven by woke governments and a legal system made to protect Criminals, Deviates and general no hopers.
 
I've posted before that we should declare Australia a republic and celebrate Republic Day on the last Monday in January, replacing Australia Day as a public holiday.
Would not solve the issues that the aboriginals are after.
Pay the rent
Not your land always ours.
The activists won't be happy till they control everything and everyone
 
We are the only country in the world who's national day marks the start of colonisation, there are literally more countries without national days. For such an extreme case, sitting on the fence isn't exactly the middle ground. And before anyone pulls out the new poll that says 69% of Australians want Jan 26 to be our national day, that poll was commissioned by the Institute of Public Affairs, a heavily Liberal Party-aligned think tank and only had 1002 respondents.
I think 69% isn't accurate either I think it's much higher!
 
That was a pretty shitty AO. The sport is really missing the star power now.

As much as Djokovic annoys me, how I was wishing for a player who would smack an ordinary serve cross court for a winner, not just meekly paddle it back into play.

It was a rubbish men's final between Sinner and Temu Sinner.
 
][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji6][emoji6]" data-quote="klem" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
Would not solve the issues that the aboriginals are after.
Pay the rent
Not your land always ours.
The activists won't be happy till they control everything and everyone

And whose land was it before then ? The earth is over billion years old, something tells me the aborigines weren’t the first ones here. Who cares anyway, I was born here is all I know. My country too.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Minority groups have more say these days because every fk’d up group have more rights these days
It’s driven by woke governments and a legal system made to protect Criminals, Deviates and general no hopers.

👀
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Poor analogy GD. US has won the most Grand Slam titles, double next best which is us, most Davis Cups and holds one of the 4 majors. They are the biggest tennis nation on earth. But considering the haven't had a great male player for 20 plus years, it's a bit off the radar as tennis doesn't fit the American Exceptionalism narrative at the moment.

That's what I'm saying - like soccer, their women are much better at tennis than their men.
 
Minority groups have more say these days because every fk’d up group have more rights these days
It’s driven by woke governments and a legal system made to protect Criminals, Deviates and general no hopers.
Tell me one right "minorities" have that you don't have in Australia today.
 
Star power as measured by how big they are in America? Because I won't point out the obvious lol.

That Hewitt/Roddick/Other period between the end of Agassi/Sampras and the beginning of Federer/Nadal/Djokovic was like the bit between the end of the Cold War and 9/11.
 
That Hewitt/Roddick/Other period between the end of Agassi/Sampras and the beginning of Federer/Nadal/Djokovic was like the bit between the end of the Cold War and 9/11.
Sampras/Agassi/Federer/Nadal/Djokovic/Rafter/Hewitt was unparalleled.

Even the mid card players were amazingly talented. Roddick v El Aynaoui was a proper struggle.
 
What? No!

Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Rupert Murdoch, Marc Andreesen, Mark Zuckerberg, Gina Rinehart, Jeff Bezos and James Packer care about wealth inequality and the little guy!

Don't forget Clive Palmer and his bizarre Mineralogy ads where he blames renewable energy for the cost of living crisis.
 
I believe people not only in Australia but world wide have had a gut full about being forced to think a certain way on issues by minority groups.
The things that need to be addressed like housing and the rising cost of living is getting pushed aside by diversity dribble.
Maybe not in my lifetime but sometime in the future I can see a Pauline Hanson type being PM.
Before you laugh and say it’s nonsense remember America just voted in Trump.

Looks like 2505 came sooner than we expected.

 
Heard Albo at Oz day ceremony this morning say that the first 7 people to became naturalized Australian citizens, was on 26th Jan 1949, when Ben Chifley did the honours in Canberra.

So Australians travelled on British passports before that? Were still British Subjects?

I wonder when Sect 44 of the constitution re politicians and dual citizens not being able to run for parliament, subsection (i)
"is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power;"

stopped applying to British/UKian born people with dual citizenship as UK was now seen as a foreign power?

1901 - Federation, probably not, or
1931 - Statute of Westminster passed in UK after the dominions had an input and they got increased sovereignty. or
1942 - Statute of Westminster Adoption Act passed in Oz in 1942, mainly because of WWII sovereignty issues, or
1986 - Australia Act passed in Oz and then UK, to stop UK from passing any laws that would affect Australia. Think before this, the states could still appeal cases to Privy Council if they didn't like Supreme Court and High Court rulings.

When all those dual citizen politicians ended up in the High Court a few years ago, this was never raised as to when that change occurred re the UK seen as a foreign power, and how many politicians may have been in breach of section 44 pre 1931/1942/1986 or post 1986.

The 7 were citizens of non-Australian countries (in this case European) just like citizenship ceremonies now.


The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 provided for non-Australian and British citizens to renounce their former citizenship and to swear allegiance to Australia and the crown – this is the first ceremony at which such change of citizenship took place. Under the Act all Australian-born people are citizens of Australia; previously, Australians had been British subjects.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Banter TRTT Part 15: David KOCH on Epstein List!!!11!!!!!!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top