Preview Preliminary Final: Collingwood v GWS, MCG 22 September, 7.50pm

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
That one’s straight forward. Martin would be classed as a general forward by CD and the defence weighting for a general forward would be limited. Wood and Daicos would be classed as wingers by CD and the defence weighting for wingman would be statistically significant.

There’s no bias there against Collingwood and the only bias would be in the statistical areas they choose to be significant for each role. For instance metres gained for wingman to me is significant, but if they weren’t including that with a heavy weighting in their player ratings that’s a bias against high metres gained wingman. Instead of high metres gained Collingwood wingers…

FWIW Martin was stitched up! How he missed out on a AA blazer behind Serong and Merrett is beyond me…
I understand the difference in positional stats and I agree 100% but that's not what Hoyne did he just stated that CD don't rate defence too highly which is my point he hand picks what stats help make his point when its Dusty defence doesnt matter but when he talks about Switkowski who he had in his AA team he said that he impacted the game with his defensive work as good as anyone they both made his AA team in the forward line just shows the bloke is silly has no clue unless he has a CD stat sheet
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It oddly feels like there's barely any discussion around the fact that the rested top of the ladder side with basically no injuries is going into a Prelim gaining the best player in the comp into their side
Listening to the footy shows and radio, you'd think we are playing the 2002 Brisbane Lions
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The media are balls deep in the hope of GWS and that other s**t team causing upsets

Ironically, in 2019 and 2022 the GFs were such one-sided dirges, most neutrals agreed it would have been better had we made it.

EDIT: You can add 2007 to that!
 
Last edited:
Funny how the whole "Collingwood and Melbourne have the easy side of the draw" narrative has been thrown out.

The media reporting this finals series has been as shallow, and lacking in genuine analysis, as I can recall. And not just us, but Brisbane too. We both barely rate a mention.

Melbourne has been talked to death, and lost both finals. I timed AFL360 on Monday night, and the first 15-16 minutes was given over to Carlton, followed by 4-5 minutes of GWS, although their coach featured later in the show. But unfortunately with that permanent sulk and sook Chris Scott, who’d at least had his hair cut.

It’s unbalanced, contradictory, and seemingly incapable of analysing how we beat Melbourne and how we will apply that to GWS. And the superficial analysis feeds into the next superficial analysis.

Looking forward to the footy journos waking up on Saturday after our game and asking - what just happened?
 
A lot of people talking about how much GWS have improved since the last time we played them, I'm more interested in how much we've improved since last year's prelim

Hill, Markov & Mitchell > Krueger, Bianco & Noble

Whatever we get from McStay cannot possibly be worse than Ash Johnson's 2 touches and no score

Both Daicos brothers are much improved, as is, imho, IQ & McCreery

We didn't have Adams either

Cox got injured (hopefully won't happen this time)

We didn't have the rest

We had to play Sydney in Sydney

And we still only lost by a point... we are a much better team this year, well drilled & with a sense of belief, and we'll be playing a team that will definitely be less rested than us in front of an overwhelmingly Collingwood crowd
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top