Recalling bounces

[Johnny Karate]

As per laws of the game:
13.3 RECALLING BOUNCES OR THROW-UPS
(a) A field Umpire may recall any bounce or throw-up of the football that in the Umpire’s opinion does not allow for the football to be contested by both Rucks.

A typically rubbery rule that feels as though it is being relaxed. For a while it felt as though every bounce that was slightly off centre was recalled as a throw up. The interpretation being that an off centre bounce didn’t allow both ruckman to contest the ball.

However, there seems to be a lot of off-centre bounces that are now deemed ‘contest able’ by both rucks. Which is fine but it is now leading to a lot of frustrating ruck free kicks where the ruckman camped under the ball gets done for ‘blocking’.

Is this just crap umpiring or a clear directive from the league?

 

[HarryBeef]

Definitely been a change in the last week or so

 

[Generalissimo]

I think there's been a lot more skewy bounces of late. I'm not sure why. If it's one or two a game I figure the umps don't mind calling it back. If it's three or four times a quarter, recalling them gets time consuming and embarrassing.

The center bounces in the Geelong/Collingwood game, for example, were utterly heinous.

 

[jabba5114]

Just throw it up now. Umpires can't bounce it properly anyway. Waste of time

Sent from my motorola edge 30 pro using Tapatalk

 

[onthemoney]

Every game of every week. It's putrid.

Just throw the ball up already.

 

[Del165198]

They only recall it now if it goes outside the circle, which basically means a 45 degree angle. Still happens all the time? Why are they so shit at it? Just chuck it up