Does anyone here play roulette?
I am working on a few different ideas to see whether I can find an edge. The ideas are based on consistency within a region of numbers.
For instance the other night the wheel at one table spun as follows
18 (0)
35 (+5) (+5)
32 (+4) (+9)
16 (-17) (-8)
5 (+2) (-6)
25 (+12) (+6)
35 (-10) (-4) ....next spin is a bet
28 (-2) (-6) HIT (9 numbers....+26)
9 (-5) (-11)
23 (+10) (-1).... next spin is a bet
8 (+1) (0) HIT (3 numbers....+32)next spin is a bet
19 (+13) (+13) LOSS (1 number....-1)
4 (+1) (+14)
30 (+11) (+25)
26 (-16) (+9)
15 (+3) (+12)
27 (+9) (+21)
27 (+0) (+21)
30 (-4) (+17)
21 (+10) (+27)
22 (-14) (+13)
16 (-7) (+6)
11 (+7) (+13)
19 (+11) (+24)
18 (-11) (+13)
11 (-15) (-2)...next spin is a bet
11 (0) (-2) HIT (5 numbers...+30)next spin is a bet
34 (+5) (+3) LOSS (5 numbers...-5)
0 (-9) (-6)
4 (+4) (-2)....next spin is a bet
16 (+17) (+15) LOSS (5 numbers....-5)
18 (-8) (+7)
36 (-16) (-9)
6 (+3) (-6)
6 (0) (-6)
3 (-12) (-18)
8 (+18) (0)...next spin is a bet
20 (-8) (-8) LOSS (1 number...-1)
12 (-9) (-17)
18 (-1) (-18)
18 (0) (-18)
We had 7 bets across a total of 29 numbers with 3 winners returning 105.
OUT 29
IN 105
On different points of the roulette wheel I have directional arrows and that is where the +- comes into it. The + is the amount of numbers they are forward on the wheel. The - is the amount of numbers they are backwards on the wheel.
When the wheel gets within a MAX of -4...+4 range that is when we place our bet, with the theory being that at this point the wheel is spinning consistently.
It probably doesn't hold up long term or have any substation factual evidence or reasons as to why this may work - but it is a bit of fun for me.
So what whacky ideas do you have with roulette?
I am working on a few different ideas to see whether I can find an edge. The ideas are based on consistency within a region of numbers.
For instance the other night the wheel at one table spun as follows
18 (0)
35 (+5) (+5)
32 (+4) (+9)
16 (-17) (-8)
5 (+2) (-6)
25 (+12) (+6)
35 (-10) (-4) ....next spin is a bet
28 (-2) (-6) HIT (9 numbers....+26)
9 (-5) (-11)
23 (+10) (-1).... next spin is a bet
8 (+1) (0) HIT (3 numbers....+32)next spin is a bet
19 (+13) (+13) LOSS (1 number....-1)
4 (+1) (+14)
30 (+11) (+25)
26 (-16) (+9)
15 (+3) (+12)
27 (+9) (+21)
27 (+0) (+21)
30 (-4) (+17)
21 (+10) (+27)
22 (-14) (+13)
16 (-7) (+6)
11 (+7) (+13)
19 (+11) (+24)
18 (-11) (+13)
11 (-15) (-2)...next spin is a bet
11 (0) (-2) HIT (5 numbers...+30)next spin is a bet
34 (+5) (+3) LOSS (5 numbers...-5)
0 (-9) (-6)
4 (+4) (-2)....next spin is a bet
16 (+17) (+15) LOSS (5 numbers....-5)
18 (-8) (+7)
36 (-16) (-9)
6 (+3) (-6)
6 (0) (-6)
3 (-12) (-18)
8 (+18) (0)...next spin is a bet
20 (-8) (-8) LOSS (1 number...-1)
12 (-9) (-17)
18 (-1) (-18)
18 (0) (-18)
We had 7 bets across a total of 29 numbers with 3 winners returning 105.
OUT 29
IN 105
On different points of the roulette wheel I have directional arrows and that is where the +- comes into it. The + is the amount of numbers they are forward on the wheel. The - is the amount of numbers they are backwards on the wheel.
When the wheel gets within a MAX of -4...+4 range that is when we place our bet, with the theory being that at this point the wheel is spinning consistently.
It probably doesn't hold up long term or have any substation factual evidence or reasons as to why this may work - but it is a bit of fun for me.
So what whacky ideas do you have with roulette?