- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,908
- 54,323
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
I’d like to see LDU head to head against bont
If it starts working against us shift Parker to lock down on him
If it starts working against us shift Parker to lock down on him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would you like to see Bailey Scott used mate? :stern lookI’d like to see LDU head to head against bont
If it starts working against us shift Parker to lock down on him
Tackle bagHow would you like to see Bailey Scott used mate? :stern look
Thanks for your prompt response. :stern lookTackle bag
Or on the wing in the vfl
Though a consistent and respectable language wouldn't have clangers like "restive" and "pulchritude" which mean precisely the opposite of what they sound like they mean.It shouldn't be. Our dictionaries are currently being re-written as we pander to people who obviously didn't pay enough attention in school. "I bet you the last time we played against each other" will never be acceptable to me, nor should it be.
Though a consistent and respectable language wouldn't have clangers like "restive" and "pulchritude" which mean precisely the opposite of what they sound like they mean.
A pragmatic approach to linguistics won't bring about the end of the world imo.
If one wishes to verse, let them verse.
Yes I too intend to avoid adopting that one.As a fellow Supercoach board regular, what do you think of the use of the word "fade" as an alternative to "avoid"?
It's got to be one of the stupidest things i've ever heard. Where did this even originate from?
As a fellow Supercoach board regular, what do you think of the use of the word "fade" as an alternative to "avoid"?
It's got to be one of the stupidest things i've ever heard. Where did this even originate from?
I was just thinking about that this morning.On topic: is anyone else quietly optimistic about the Doggies having a rough summer, including JUH being out, that we jump them Round 1?
I was just thinking about that this morning.
It's unfortunate JUH plays in the one position they have ridiculous depth in.
Darcy alone scored 7 goals against us last time. What is our answer to him this time around?
Bont + Treloar + Libba + Richards + Kennedy + Sanders is still a formidable midfield too.
If our guys can hold their own against them then the season will be looking very rosy indeed.
We also need Archer to ensure Weightman doesn't get his typical 2-3 goals against us.
Having said all that, I'd love to partake in some preseason optimism. Where will our squad have an advantage over them?
Alright so which part of the game do you think we stand a reasonable chance of gaining the upper hand in?Darcy scored 7 goals on a backline that had Corr and Dawson. That’s it.
No Logue
Comben off before qrt time
Needing to take Darcy, JUH and Naughton
Plus the midfield got smashed as we’d given up on the season following the heartbreak of the week before
Alright so which part of the game do you think we stand a reasonable chance of gaining the upper hand in?
Midfield (tho it will be hard fought) and forward line.Alright so which part of the game do you think we stand a reasonable chance of gaining the upper hand in?
Just in general; "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts". This is from 1000 yards away, but the preseason reports from the NM people I speak with and on this board, compared to the preseaon the Dogs are having (not just JUH they have other issues), are night and day. I wouldn't be shocked if the Dogs have a slow start to the year.Having said all that, I'd love to partake in some preseason optimism. Where will our squad have an advantage over them?
Just in general; "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts". This is from 1000 yards away, but the preseason reports from the NM people I speak with and on this board, compared to the preseaon the Dogs are having (not just JUH they have other issues), are night and day. I wouldn't be shocked if the Dogs have a slow start to the year.
Our path to victory is really just halve the contest in the mid and hold their forwards to something reasonable. Our forward line have been very good to excellent at taking their chances over the last few years, in no small part this is due to Larkey. He now has some help in Darling, and PC and CZ look primed. So even if we get a few less chances up front, I think we take more of them compared to the Dogs. Weightman is the only one that I fear getting off the chain.