rye
⠀
- Apr 24, 2022
- 3,744
- 10,239
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
no team i hate more than carlton and the way their supporters have crapped on throughout this entire affair just reminded me why
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its also illogical that the above also isnt taken into account when one considers the permeatation of a given game as described above. these people at the tribunal surely are smarter than me and know this yet it is completely ignored b/c as we see in the real world, those with deep pockets get the best lawyers to get clients off on technicaties that serve no social or natural justice and this is the legal system at work despite there guilt. Joke.Absurd decision - he knew Cal was there, it was at a time in the game Carlton needed a lift and he deliberately pulverised an unsuspecting opponent.
And to think Mitch Robisnon got a week in round one for I'm still not sure exactly what.
Can we get there lawyers in the future?
as long as you rely on the tribunal to get the technicalities wrong, invest in a good lawyer and you're sweetSo does a player know tomorrow night what the consequences are for a bump that makes contact to the head or are we back to being confused what the hell is going on?
What this does do is allow any future concussion/brain damage law suits to use this as a precidient. Would definitely be a huge advantage for a "Good Lawyer" to say the AFL do not consider head knocks as serious long term damage to the player. Solicitors/Lawyers & Carlton should be the only ones happy about this decision.as long as you rely on the tribunal to get the technicalities wrong, invest in a good lawyer and you're sweet
I also hope he never hurts himself in any way. I love watching him play the game he plays.I suppose the kind of karmic outcome here would be for Carlton to win the last two games and Capt'n Sniper to do an ACL or something in the last five minutes of the second game and miss all of next season ... not wishing it on him in any way but the schadenfreude factor would certainly be there...
And the remorse he showed afterwards really touched our hearts and showed elements of his character that will stay with us forever ... not every great player is a good bloke (actually since we used to think of Hodge the same way I guess if Cripps ended up a valued Lion we would forgive him)I also hope he never hurts himself in any way. I love watching him play the game he plays.
I honestly dont think he intentionally went out to hurt Cal but that isn't what should this suspension should be for. He bumped intentionally which caused a concussion....thats it really.
So does a player know tomorrow night what the consequences are for a bump that makes contact to the head or are we back to being confused what the hell is going on?
So long as you feign that you’re contesting the ball, even if you’re late to the contest, it’s free game.
Legally though the basis is there for it to be overturned on the same grounds if the ball is in contention and they're going for the ball.In the air at least. If a player has their head over the footy and turns their body to deliberate be hit high like in the robbo suspension then that's no good
Legally though the basis is there for it to be overturned on the same grounds if the ball is in contention and they're going for the ball.
It's actually ludicrous the more I analyse it . Cal had his hands on the ball. Cripps had the opportunity to tackle and instead charged into him in a situation where Cal had no opportunity to protect himself .Robbo was going for the ball though though. Duursma just got there first just as Ah Chee got their first. To make matters worst though Duursma tried to draw high contact unlike Ah Chee and Ah Chee was in a more vulnerable position as he couldn't brace for contact
An absolute s**t show all round. Wouldn't blame anyone for being 'soft' and not putting themselves in a vulnerable position unlike what Cal did
There are actually very good legal precedents for doing so re duty of care in many aspects of human interaction.I love our game and have done so since I was knee high. Have seen many crap things through the journey but this takes the cake.
Speaking of lawyers. What we need now is someone here with the necessary quals to take on this case pro bono and sue the bugger for assault.
Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk
I think the thing that bothers me the most is that who the player is and who their club is, is paramount to the outcome.There are actually very good legal precedents for doing so re duty of care in many aspects of human interaction.
No one has had the guts to do it re AFL though Matthews did get charged with assault and copped a 12 month good behaviour bond IIRC.
Times have changed , that was nearly 40 years ago, and if he did what he did now he could have ended up with a spell inside.
Players suing other players is coming . People sue others for looking sideways at them these days. Lawyers are already smelling the dollars and the notoriety.
Which is why it s important ,and the AFL knows this better than anybody, that a duty of care factor is paramount in its decisions on unlawful contact.
It's a chicken and egg thing. If it's a star that you need you explore every possible legal angle. If it's Robbo you just suck it up.I think the thing that bothers me the most is that who the player is and who their club is, is paramount to the outcome.
Two instances of big name players from big Vic clubs (Cothcin and Cripps) against two hapless and irrelevant clubs (Shiel (GWS) and AhChee (us) getting off when they concuss players at critical times of there respective clubs seasons - Tiges playing in a GF and Carlton needing its best players to get them into a final series - first time in over 10 years - am I being cynical in thinking there are correlations and biases at play.
Do we really think if Green and Robinson were substituted for Cotchin and Cripps and then Green and Robinson committed the same act that led to Cotchin and Cripps being taken and concussed in the first half with as much riding on it as Cotchin and Cripps had on the line and were taken out in the manner Shiel andAhChee were taken out that we get the same result? The answer should be emphatically yes, that who is involved doesn't matter, but every AFL follower knows that would clearly not be the case. Therein lies a very very serious problem, yet for some reason the AFL industry isnt interested in exploring such notions; wonder why?