Best and fairest against aker voss brown lappin leppitsch. I dont think Collingwood has had those stars ever maybe Swan Thomas Didak the hardest competition in his best and fairest years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Gaz stands alone, after that he is in the conversation.So you are saying Pendlebury has the 2nd best peak of the 2000s. Surely you are joking?
Black's 2x runners-up in the Brownlow were surprise results on the night and in those two years, he made only one AA squad and neither side. He finished 5th in the Lions' B&F in 2007 despite them not playing finals.Best and fairest against aker voss brown lappin leppitsch. I dont think Collingwood has had those stars ever maybe Swan Thomas Didak the hardest competition in his best and fairest years.
He is a gun for sure! I just think Black could do a little more and 323 he did play for a long time as well.Black's 2x runners-up in the Brownlow were surprise results on the night and in those two years, he made only one AA squad and neither side. He finished 5th in the Lions' B&F in 2007 despite them not playing finals.
Black achieved his first All-Australian at 22 and last at 24. Pendlebury achieved his first at 22 and last at 31. Pendlebury likely would have won another AA at 32 had he not missed four games in 2020. One year after Black had retired by comparison, Pendlebury was prolific in a Collingwood premiership with a memorable last quarter performance to help drag his side over the line. At 36 years old, he continues to be a big contributor week to week.
The way Martin is going he could play 200 more games and still wouldn't catch Pendlebury
Why would I do something you won't even do yourself?It’s just a simple and pretty valid question. I know why you won’t answer it though and that’s fine.
I reckon if observers went by peak alone, a few (including me) would have Koutifides in the very top echelon. He'd probably be the third best player at his absolute peak that I have seen (starting circa 1980) after Ablett Snr and Carey.Why would I do something you won't even do yourself?
Show me where you rank his peak relative to the top 40 AFL players this century, provide your reasoning and then you can demand others to do more work. I've already contributed 100x more value to this thread, but if you do want to actually start discussing things by using your own insight then you are free to begin.
You won't though, and that's fine.
You see the difference between Pendles, Danger etc compared to Gaz and Dusty is that Gaz and Dusty could be the best midfielder and/or the best fwd in a match.Gaz stands alone, after that he is in the conversation.
Only 3 players have had a better player rating season - Gaz, Dusty and Danger. Pendles 19.9 is better than Fyfe, Bont, Petracca etc.
Pendles has claimed the coaches award, as a best player in a season.
So it depends if you want a single season peak like Dusty in 2017, or a player who has maintained their peak level over more seasons like Gaz, Danger or Pendles.
Gaz stands alone, but Pendles five seasons from 2010-2014 are as good as anybody else you can put forward.
Mindnumbingly shallow analysisYou see the difference between Pendles, Danger etc compared to Gaz and Dusty is that Gaz and Dusty could be the best midfielder and/or the best fwd in a match.
Dusty has kicked 6 goals in a QF and regularly outscored elite FFs like J Cameron, Hawkins, C Cameron, Tex in a Finals match playing 50% fwd gametime.
Pendles whilst being an elite field kick, doesn’t have that in his kit, if he did he would be used there. In fact in almost 400 games he’s only scored more than 2 goals 5 times. Yep only 5.
Similarly players like Danger, Fyfe and Judd who were the best of the best inside mids were also well known butchers.
Another interesting stats if you want to go career averages look at this:
Dusty averages 24.4 dis and 1.12 goals a game
Pendlebury averages 25.7 and 0.5 goals a game
So for 1 disposal less you get more than double the amount of goals from Dusty. Also keeping in mind Pendles has the most disposals ever. This is why I believe they are in different tiers. I don’t see a reason to pick Pendles over Dusty especially in finals.
Yet trueMindnumbingly shallow analysis
Putting Martin on the same level as GAJ...Mindnumbingly shallow analysis
FMD, something more than 'hur dur goals!'Yet true
What else do you want to look at then?
With the averages declining...fast.Another interesting stats if you want to go career averages look at this:
Dusty averages 24.4 dis and 1.12 goals a game
Even if he maintained his 2024 averages (when there would/will certainly be a far bigger drop off in years to come), getting to game 400 would have Dusty at 23.0 disposals and 0.96 goals per game.With the averages declining...fast.
Let's hope for your sake he retires soon...
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
Id put Martin on a similar level to Jake Stringer.Putting Martin on the same level as GAJ...
Oh boy.
Oh and just like that I have a new favorite poster.If we're still talking about the poor man's Harley Reid - you don't win Norm Smith medals by being a chump. There is also no dispute Dustin Martin is in the mix for best midfielder of the AFL era not named Ablett.
However, it's not a slight on Dustin Martin to rate him behind someone like Scott Pendlebury. Do Richmond supporters also get upset if someone ranks Matthew Scarlett over Alex Rance?
/bait
Oh and just like that I have a new favorite poster.
The Scarlett/Rance slip in was sneaky brilliant.
I doubt we will hear the last of that.
Absolute GoldWho is the best Key Defender of the 21st Century?
Key Defenders 6 - Matthew Scarlett | 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011 5 - Alex Rance | 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 4 - Jeremy McGovern | 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 4 - Darren Glass | 2006, 2007, 2011, 2012 Basic question I know but an interesting one. To select these four players over all other...www.bigfooty.com
105 pages and counting.
Horrible analysis.You see the difference between Pendles, Danger etc compared to Gaz and Dusty is that Gaz and Dusty could be the best midfielder and/or the best fwd in a match.
Dusty has kicked 6 goals in a QF and regularly outscored elite FFs like J Cameron, Hawkins, C Cameron, Tex in a Finals match playing 50% fwd gametime.
Pendles whilst being an elite field kick, doesn’t have that in his kit, if he did he would be used there. In fact in almost 400 games he’s only scored more than 2 goals 5 times. Yep only 5.
Similarly players like Danger, Fyfe and Judd who were the best of the best inside mids were also well known butchers.
Another interesting stats if you want to go career averages look at this:
Dusty averages 24.4 dis and 1.12 goals a game
Pendlebury averages 25.7 and 0.5 goals a game
So for 1 disposal less you get more than double the amount of goals from Dusty. Also keeping in mind Pendles has the most disposals ever. This is why I believe they are in different tiers. I don’t see a reason to pick Pendles over Dusty especially in finals.
We’ll suggest something else we’ve already established he’s got better averages in Brownlow votes, disposals, goals, better in finals, better peak. I’m running out of stuff to compare.FMD, something more than 'hur dur goals!'
His desire to coach will absolutely propel his standing in the game