- Aug 9, 2019
- 35,653
- 62,256
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
The longer it goes you would think is in Shano's interest?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I am betting that if McAdam gets off, we are going to sanctioned going forward for stuff like spitting on the sidewalk...they are going to go after us like we have never seen before. they will want retribution for us daring to challenge their bulls**t biased rulings against us...Just my thoughts.
A motza
Do they charge in 6 minute blocks or per hour?A motza
Fortunately the current morons will be long gone before we're relevant again!I am betting that if McAdam gets off, we are going to sanctioned going forward for stuff like spitting on the sidewalk...they are going to go after us like we have never seen before. they will want retribution for us daring to challenge their bulls**t biased rulings against us...Just my thoughts.
If people think the AFL will just forgive and forget..I have a used car to sell you
Technically it was “low impact”, because Wehr still was able to play out the match. “High impact” is often for incidents where players are stretchered off, unable to play out the match, and likely to spend a week or more on the sidelines.A bit rich to ask for it be low impact that's biting off more than we can chew
70 minutes and counting now..
And a bump is within the rules. Just like taking a mark and digging your knee into the back. Are they going to penalise that because it IS the same thing.Technically it was “low impact”, because Wehr still was able to play out the match. “High impact” is often for incidents where players are stretchered off, unable to play out the match, and likely to spend a week or more on the sidelines.
Yeah, let’s just ban the tackle, the pack marks, the high intensity chasing, because…”potential for injury”.So now it's not about head injury? It's about potential body injury?
Let's just fold the game.
That’s the slippery slope.And a bump is within the rules. Just like taking a mark and digging your knee into the back. Are they going to penalise that because it IS the same thing.
Considering the default position in an appeal would be "lol no. gtfo" to the crows. A longer deliberation would suggest the tribunal are not dismissing their arguments.The longer it goes you would think is in Shano's interest?
And every time they throw a bs charge at us we should have a go back. Great to see us not copping their crap. If the appeal fails, injunction and take it to the supreme court.I am betting that if McAdam gets off, we are going to sanctioned going forward for stuff like spitting on the sidewalk...they are going to go after us like we have never seen before. they will want retribution for us daring to challenge their bulls**t biased rulings against us...Just my thoughts.
If people think the AFL will just forgive and forget..I have a used car to sell you
Strip poker could be more interesting?The waiting game sucks, let's play hungry hungry hippos
Lets be honest here.Strip poker could be more interesting?
Maybe this happened...still deliberating...
Imagine Christian and Gill are on the phone to the panel members and they are like
Panel:-'Michael, Gill...we have thrown around every option to try and not throw this charge out but are coming up sucking our thumbs every time..'
Christian:-'Jesus you lot, we told you to just rubber stamp our decision...make up anything and AFL 360 and SEN will gaslight the public - don't let that club make me look like an idiot again - this was to be retribution time..'
Panel:- 'we have thought about that too and still can't justify the charge.....boss'