Rumour Slobbo sacked, Lyon in the box seat

Remove this Banner Ad

what a fantastic world it would be if we all went around sleeping with our friends ex boyfriends or girlfriends

I can only talk about myself, there's not a chance in hell I would ever do that and how do u even get yourself in that position in the first place
Oh, look, as I said, I think it's pretty ordinary behaviour, and if I were a friend of Garry's I'd be asking myself whether I was ok with someone prepared to put his best friend's happiness below his own like that.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

yes he does. he says what he thinks. When he's asked a question, he says what he thinks.

He says what others t are too afraid to say also.

If he thinks a team are shit he says it, if he thinks someone should retire he says it, if he thinks are player is overrated or over payed he says it.
It's what he thinks. Other people don't say it because they don't want to ruffle feathers and are too concerned about being liked by everyone in the industry.

campaigner says what he thinks then backs it up.

Stupid people think he invents his point view and opinion for click bait. He doesn't have to invent anything he just isn't afraid to say what he thinks where others won't because it may go against the status quo or harm their image/brand. Easier to play it safe and keep everyone happy.

No worries, Kane.
 
yes he does. he says what he thinks. When he's asked a question, he says what he thinks.

He says what others t are too afraid to say also.

If he thinks a team are shit he says it, if he thinks someone should retire he says it, if he thinks are player is overrated or over payed he says it.
It's what he thinks. Other people don't say it because they don't want to ruffle feathers and are too concerned about being liked by everyone in the industry.

campaigner says what he thinks then backs it up.

Stupid people think he invents his point view and opinion for click bait. He doesn't have to invent anything he just isn't afraid to say what he thinks where others won't because it may go against the status quo or harm their image/brand. Easier to play it safe and keep everyone happy.
Problem is most of the time his thoughts are stupid. He has admitted he just tries to think of attention grabbing headlines and play devils advocate, its not that he actually believes it. He follows the model of certain US sports hosts. Clearly has bias towards certain clubs and doesn't back his statements up with facts.
 
Earth to mighty lions, men don’t own women.

You should try to sleep with your friends' partners since noone owns anyone.

Honestly, call me old fashioned but for many ppl there is still such a thing as living by a code of honour or ethics - especially when it comes to expectations in friendships you have forged.
 
You should try to sleep with your friends' partners since noone owns anyone.

Honestly, call me old fashioned but for many ppl there is still such a thing as living by a code of honour or ethics - especially when it comes to expectations in friendships you have forged.
I’ll say it again.

Men don’t own women. If a woman decides to **** a man then she’s made her own decision. Good luck to her.
 
I’ll say it again.

Men don’t own women. If a woman decides to **** a man then she’s made her own decision. Good luck to her.

I don't think that's the revolutionary statement that you think it is. It's not about the woman.

If 2 guys have a genuine friendship then for many there is usually an honor code between them.

If you don't understand that then that's fine (I feel bad for you that you don't have genuine brotherhood with anyone in this life).

But the statement that anyone that lives by such a code thinks that they 'own women' is a straw man.
 
I don't think that's the revolutionary statement that you think it is. It's not about the woman.

If 2 guys have a genuine friendship then for many there is usually an honor code between them.

If you don't understand that then that's fine (I feel bad for you that you don't have genuine brotherhood with anyone in this life).

But the statement that anyone that lives by such a code thinks that they 'own women' is a straw man.
The bro code you identify is at its core based on the ownership of women by men.
 
The bro code you identify is at its core based on the ownership of women by men.


'bro code' - sounds juvenile and probably has a lot of other dubious morals tied in with it that we would probably be in agreement with are immature.
Which is why comment didn't include anything dumb like "bros before hoes" or something to that effect.

It's just your assumption that because another man would not cross certain lines due to the respect for a friend they care and love means they think that women can be owned.

I'm simply talking about the honor and respect that can exist between friends or 'brothers' where love is such a strong emotion you would forgo the opportunity to sleep with someone that they once loved because it would hurt them.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Slobbo sacked, Lyon in the box seat

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top