Reply to thread

Paul cameron Cambridge university press survey in 2005 "children of homosexuals and transexuals more apt to be homosexual . And I quote:


"Do the sexual inclinations of parents influence those of their children? Of 77 adult children of homosexual partners who volunteered for three different investigations, at least 23 (30%) were currently homosexual.: twelve  55% of 22 daughters and 3(21%) of fourteen sons of lesbians; five (29%) of seventeen daughter and three (17%) of eighteen sons of gays; none of six sons with both a gay and lesbian parent. At least 25 (32%) were currently heterosexual. Of ten with transexual parents, one of nine daughters was currently lesbian, one was currently heterosexual and one was transexual. The sons sexual preference was not reported. These findings suggest that parents sexual inclinations influence their childrens"


If you know anything about statistical sampling and hypothesis testing you will know that the critical factor in conclusively determining an hypothesis is standard deviation from mean. If the population mean of prevalence of same sex attraction is approx 3% then the sample ought reflect same. If it doesn't and instead produces results ten times or more population mean incidence, then the hypothesis is proved. That children of same sex relationships produce disproportionately greater same sex attraction offspring....and that is so despite what in statistical terms is a low sample size simply because of the extent of deviation.


I don't know but my choice of the descriptive "dramatically influences" is probably understated than overstated.


I will go one further to prove my point which is merely a scientific conclusion


Back
Top