Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it will put my mind at ease, that's for sure.At least tomorrow when the umpires dept come out & say that non 50 to Scott was an error we'll all feel a whole lot better.
That one where he leaned forward and pushed he's head in to get a free was just deplorable.Just absolutely totally utterly sick of it. Those perceived to be good players or good teams get umpired differently. Every. Single. Time.
I don’t care how good a player Daicos is, I hate watching him play
Yep, we can all feel like the English. It was a moral victory.At least tomorrow when the umpires dept come out & say that non 50 to Scott was an error we'll all feel a whole lot better.
we got sloppy afterr half time and made a lot of errors, fwiw i didnt think the umpiring was bad at all,Exhibit A, i swear the free kick's were basically even at 1/2 time, ended up 24 to 14, we got 4 less than our season average, they got 5 more than their's, make of that what you will.
Somebody said they got 15 frees in a row.Exhibit A, i swear the free kick's were basically even at 1/2 time, ended up 24 to 14, we got 4 less than our season average, they got 5 more than their's, make of that what you will.
Exhibit A, i swear the free kick's were basically even at 1/2 time, ended up 24 to 14, we got 4 less than our season average, they got 5 more than their's, make of that what you will.
WATCH: Score review inexplicably doesn't overturn Crisp goal despite clear Roo touch
And didn't this goal prove enormously crucial!www.theroar.com.au
Somebody said they got 15 frees in a row.
They got some soft ones, but they also got away with some umpiring howlers like missed 50s. I saw people posting that the one in Q1 down in the forward pocket was a late call by the ump but it was almost dead in front of us and the players definitely reacted to a whistle. It's possible that some may have thought it was a pie free, What amazed us was that the ball was brought back as we thought that at least one umpire conceded that the play should continue.
The two men on the Scott mark near the end was downright unforgivable. How can four umpires have not reaacted to that? It is impossible. Impossible. Especially in context of paying the 50 against Will. FFS.
Did I mention that somebody said they got 15 frees in a row. Fifteen. That is implausible. Actually it is almost impossible. Impossible.
Yep that was on the scoreboard. Collingwood supporters in front of us had been whinging about their terrible treatment in the 1st half.I can confirm they were 10-10 at or near 1/2 time.
We know from every tme the commentators say it, that EVERY goal is reviewed EVERY time WITHOUT exception.WATCH: Score review inexplicably doesn't overturn Crisp goal despite clear Roo touch
And didn't this goal prove enormously crucial!www.theroar.com.au
HojumanwE reViEw EVeRthiNg.
In all seriousness, I think the umps really want North to have pick one this year and they did their bit to help.Just to be clear - the Sheezel free kick that saw the ball goes through several Collingwood hands after the free kick = no 50-metre penalty. Luckily Sheezel was good enough to goal from the pocket anyway.
But the 50 against Phillips (or Powell?) in the 3rd when he was fractionally late giving the ball back as he tried to see where the Collingwood play was - that resulted in a goal.
And of course, the Scott cluster **** should have seen him shooting for goal from no more than 25 metres out.
I also suggest that within the run of 15 frees that you mentioned, there were at least 5 that were shots on goal.
Commentators hardly gave a shit. Can you imagine a big club on Friday night footy? They’d be talking about it all night!WATCH: Score review inexplicably doesn't overturn Crisp goal despite clear Roo touch
And didn't this goal prove enormously crucial!www.theroar.com.au
Was a north free kick in the first where the pies player kicked the ball into the crowd seconds after the whistle… no 50Just to be clear - the Sheezel free kick that saw the ball goes through several Collingwood hands after the free kick = no 50-metre penalty. Luckily Sheezel was good enough to goal from the pocket anyway.
But the 50 against Phillips (or Powell?) in the 3rd when he was fractionally late giving the ball back as he tried to see where the Collingwood play was - that resulted in a goal.
And of course, the Scott cluster **** should have seen him shooting for goal from no more than 25 metres out.
I also suggest that within the run of 15 frees that you mentioned, there were at least 5 that were shots on goal.