So what, he kept quiet about it for one week.
Stephen Dank has 11 days to hand over papers about supplement program to former Sharks players
- Thread starter jerry springer
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Read the whole thing for christ sake , Seriously
The document, posted on the AFL's website, also reveals players from nine clubs admitted sourcing supplements privately.
They did fail to document substances, hence their programs had inadequate documentation!
Wow
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
HE WAS REPORTING ON THE DOCUMENT THAT WAS POSTED ON THE AFL WEBSITE
For the third time, read the whole Blog
The article presented on the AFL website is not the survey, its a snapshot of the survey. The other articles include other details
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
No , it the report released explaining the conclusions or findings of the survey.
The actual Survey will never be released
Nor have you seen the AFL report, I think you have trouble reading and comprehending what is in front of you. I never once based my point on the AFL survey. It was based on the article on the AFL website.
Larkins, like the authors of other articles, presented some of the information from the survey. Information from Larkins were not included in other articles, and visa versa. Together you get an idea of the content of the survey
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
No you get an idea of the findings of the survey from the DOCUMENT THAT WAS POSTED ON THE AFL WEBSITE.
And the AFL website article doesn't include all details about the survey.
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I am still trying to figure out how he considers Larkins the author of the article
If I was going to describe Essendon's record keeping, 'inadequate' would be a kindness. 'Shambolic' would be a better description.
If anyone thinks that there were other clubs where the record keeping was so lax that they weren't even sure which drugs were administered - and ASADA and the AFL are ignoring this - then you must have rocks in your head or support Essendon.
If you were to go on a building site and one person wasn't wearing a hi-vis vest, this could be deemed 'inadequate'. The EFC was more like one of those building sites in a third world country where the workers are all wearing thongs and just close their eyes when they do some welding. Shambolic.
If anyone thinks that there were other clubs where the record keeping was so lax that they weren't even sure which drugs were administered - and ASADA and the AFL are ignoring this - then you must have rocks in your head or support Essendon.
If you were to go on a building site and one person wasn't wearing a hi-vis vest, this could be deemed 'inadequate'. The EFC was more like one of those building sites in a third world country where the workers are all wearing thongs and just close their eyes when they do some welding. Shambolic.
And other articles revealed more details. Larkins confirms this when he revealed more details in a blog on 3AW
“It showed that 10 per cent of all AFL players were using a supplement, that nearly four per cent of all AFL players were using more than one supplement,” he said. - P Larkins
He was there, yet none of this information was revealed on the AFLs website. Therefore the AFLs website is not the entire survey and other articles reveal more detail
- Sep 18, 2007
- 4,854
- 8,765
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- West Perth, Fighting Illini
I am trying to work out what the hell Larkins is supposed to be saying.
2 percent of the 15 clubs ....
I thought there were 18 clubs, and 2% of 15 is 0.3 of a club.
2 percent of the 15 clubs ....
I thought there were 18 clubs, and 2% of 15 is 0.3 of a club.
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
NO they dont, The DOCUMENT on the AFL Website reveals the findings of the survey. I was wrong before it wasn't an article so I apologise
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
It is the link Mxett shared before I would say
How is the AFL article the findings when they don't reveal how many clubs did not adequately document their programs?
In fact in the 3AW blog 3AW's Larkins, an attendee at the survey release, was quoted, this statement is seen: "According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented".
Here is the link:
http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breakin...d-with-supplements-danger/20131016-2vlzj.html
Doc Larkins is not quoted as saying any of that, I hope you are just trying to play silly word games mxett. Allison said that as part of her blog, not Larkins.
Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
In fact in the 3AW blog 3AW's Larkins, an attendee at the survey release, was quoted, this statement is seen: "According to the report, Essendon and 11 other clubs admitted to using supplements that were not clearly understood or documented".[/quote]
That is not a Peter Larkin Quote, we are not stupid Mxett , Stop talking out of your backside
That is not a Peter Larkin Quote, we are not stupid Mxett , Stop talking out of your backside
