Stephen Dank has 11 days to hand over papers about supplement program to former Sharks players

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

But wasnt Dank just following Essendons orders? Did Essendon order him to play up at Cronulla, the Demons, and the Suns as well?

Mxett. I'm not playing your stupid little games any more. You clearly enjoy them, and that's fine for you, I just am not doing it any more.
 
Quite the opposite actually, its the Hird hate on these boards that induced that response.
So the discussion was did Dank work with Cronulla, evidence was posted to suggest that he indeed did so, yet you somehow managed to get Hird into the discussion. Why would you do so? He wasn't relevant to the discussion in any way shape or form.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Was this even disputed?
If you took 30sec to read where the thread was at you might have found out the following:

1/ I ask out of curiosity
2/ was he an employee of the Sharks?
3/ did he personally dole out the syringe activity?
4/ if the answer to both of those is no
5/ what records could he possible have?
6/ seeing that hes not a doctor
7/ why would he have medical records?
8/ asked out of curiosity
 
Why is it all just about PED's to you. Dr Givney disagreed with Danks methods and supplement programs the same as Dr Reid did, Cronulla sacked him, Essendon let him run a muck for a whole season pretty much
What was Cronullas aim? Essendons was clearly to have a cutting edge supplement program. Did Cronulla?
 
So Cronulla may have moved Dank on because he offered something different to what they wanted, and nothing to do with his methods. In fact he went to the Suns not long after who again moved him on, but not because they believed he was unethical or irresponsible.

Dank was taking players off site and one of the players ended up with significant bruising as soon as the Dr's found out, he tiold coach and bye bye Dank

The Cronulla Dr when he first heard Dank was at the club spoke to the Manly Dr who told him to get rid of him ASAP and they did
 
That sounds a lot like Dank acted in a rogue manner to me, giving anticoagulants without the clubs knowledge.

Well it would be Dank and the Players. Not just Dank if that is how you want to look at it. Dr Givney was unaware Dank was employed by the Sharks. Dr Givney is not a full time Dr
 
Lance Uppercut has always maintained Essendon - the Club - wouldn't receive any further sanctions. That the AFL would put forward to ASADA that they had already issued sanctions and that should be that. The problem with this approach is that Essendon haven't been charged under the anti-doping code. So if infractions notices are issued to players AND officials, I believe they would then have to deal with the Club on that basis. They keep saying "at this stage there is no evidence" - but if infraction notices are issued, there clearly would then be evidence. I personally think Essendon have been hit pretty hard as a Club, but that the personnel responsible have not. It is there that I think the true sanctions need to focus. I'm not sure ASADA/WADA would agree.

You posted in another thread that if officials get sanctions that the AFL would give EFC further sanctions.

Which post should I follow ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Stephen Dank has 11 days to hand over papers about supplement program to former Sharks players

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top