Armchair Critic
Cancelled
- Feb 8, 2013
- 9,566
- 11,241
- AFL Club
- Sydney
What? No Hird? I thought he was the mastermind cheat?
Hird did in it on the gold Coast with Dank and his catch up with his good mate Charter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? No Hird? I thought he was the mastermind cheat?
The picture suggests its actually Dank, shock horrorOf Cronulla?
The picture suggests its actually Dank, shock horror
Your Hird love makes you drag him into a discussion not involving him why?The picture suggests its actually Dank, shock horror
But wasnt Dank just following Essendons orders? Did Essendon order him to play up at Cronulla, the Demons, and the Suns as well?Ah, yes I'm well aware who the picture is of.
The picture suggests its actually Dank, shock horror
Quite the opposite actually, its the Hird hate on these boards that induced that response.Your Hird love makes you drag him into a discussion not involving him why?
But wasnt Dank just following Essendons orders? Did Essendon order him to play up at Cronulla, the Demons, and the Suns as well?
But wasnt Dank just following Essendons orders? Did Essendon order him to play up at Cronulla, the Demons, and the Suns as well?
Yeah, that's it. I was sure Hird was the mastermind cheatAre you just realising Dank was employeed at Cronulla
So the discussion was did Dank work with Cronulla, evidence was posted to suggest that he indeed did so, yet you somehow managed to get Hird into the discussion. Why would you do so? He wasn't relevant to the discussion in any way shape or form.Quite the opposite actually, its the Hird hate on these boards that induced that response.
So Cronulla sacked Dank for using PEDS? Got evidence? Why didnt they self report?As SOON as Cronulla found out they sacked him, the coach never needed any United nations Skills, Dank was never employed by Melbourne
Was this even disputed?So the discussion was did Dank work with Cronulla, evidence was posted to suggest that he indeed did so, yet you somehow managed to get Hird into the discussion. Why would you do so? He wasn't relevant to the discussion in any way shape or form.
So Cronulla sacked Dank for using PEDS? Got evidence? Why didnt they self report?
If you took 30sec to read where the thread was at you might have found out the following:Was this even disputed?
1/ I ask out of curiosity
2/ was he an employee of the Sharks?
3/ did he personally dole out the syringe activity?
4/ if the answer to both of those is no
5/ what records could he possible have?
6/ seeing that hes not a doctor
7/ why would he have medical records?
8/ asked out of curiosity
What was Cronullas aim? Essendons was clearly to have a cutting edge supplement program. Did Cronulla?Why is it all just about PED's to you. Dr Givney disagreed with Danks methods and supplement programs the same as Dr Reid did, Cronulla sacked him, Essendon let him run a muck for a whole season pretty much
Fair enough. I'm surprised anyone would question the bleeding obviousIf you took 30sec to read where the thread was at you might have found out the following:
What was Cronullas aim? Essendons was clearly to have a cutting edge supplement program. Did Cronulla?
So Cronulla may have moved Dank on because he offered something different to what they wanted, and nothing to do with his methods. In fact he went to the Suns not long after who again moved him on, but not because they believed he was unethical or irresponsible.I have no idea, I never worked for them.
So Cronulla may have moved Dank on because he offered something different to what they wanted, and nothing to do with his methods. In fact he went to the Suns not long after who again moved him on, but not because they believed he was unethical or irresponsible.
That sounds a lot like Dank acted in a rogue manner to me, giving anticoagulants without the clubs knowledge.Dank was taking players off site and one of the players ended up with significant bruising as soon as the Dr's found out, he tiold coach and bye bye Dank
That sounds a lot like Dank acted in a rogue manner to me, giving anticoagulants without the clubs knowledge.
Thats if the players knew they were receiving warfarin. If they did, why would they run to the club doctor?Well it would be Dank and the Players. Not just Dank if that is how you want to look at it. Dr Givney was unaware Dank was employed by the Sharks. Dr Givney is not a full time Dr
Thats if the players knew they were receiving warfarin. If they did, why would they run to the club doctor?
Lance Uppercut has always maintained Essendon - the Club - wouldn't receive any further sanctions. That the AFL would put forward to ASADA that they had already issued sanctions and that should be that. The problem with this approach is that Essendon haven't been charged under the anti-doping code. So if infractions notices are issued to players AND officials, I believe they would then have to deal with the Club on that basis. They keep saying "at this stage there is no evidence" - but if infraction notices are issued, there clearly would then be evidence. I personally think Essendon have been hit pretty hard as a Club, but that the personnel responsible have not. It is there that I think the true sanctions need to focus. I'm not sure ASADA/WADA would agree.