Of course it is.
Rumour Tales from the Henley Beach Cafe: CROWS 2021 RUMOURS
- Thread starter Betts are off
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Of course it is.
Brenton Davy
Premium Gold
Oh dear.
My sarcasm metre appears broken. Surely you jest.
(Edit - It’s not my sarcasm metre that’s broken, it’s my literacy. Read it as he “would” take 10 Orazios for 1 Doedee...)
Last edited:
Rickochet Rarebit
Bing Bing Bing
- Sep 28, 2020
- 19
- 23
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I am not sure that Port actually want him, especially after last year.
That is good for Adelaide = lower demand = lower price.
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
Agree to disagree
we dont want him because of what he will cost $ and picks
Hartigan UFA, but I guess with Joe going they would need to trade for him.
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
It does a little bit doesn't it.
He is 4 years younger and I'm not sure he's in a position to demand a big paycheck though. His type of player is a big need for us, but I'm not convinced we should be paying him anything other than incentive based contracts
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
They'll trade Joe I reckon, given they overvalue their players.
Samcro24
Free Soda
- Oct 28, 2014
- 11,181
- 28,844
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Agree. It should be a last chance, come home to revive your career, type thing. Not big money and a cheap trade.
If its not like that then we don't entertain it.
- Sep 5, 2017
- 1,980
- 4,180
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Not sure why Raz would come out and 'nominate' us. Hes still contracted. Hopefully the club has learnt its lesson from Gibbs and just told Orazios camp to stay quiet until its done.
hartigan is FA not happening
FA does not mean a trade can't occur.
I don't think he's a need as such. I don't think you can play 3 genuine smaller forwards. One of them needs to be able to run through the stoppage and midfield rotations. We're too inflexible as it is. I don't think he's a certain improvement on either Stengle or McAdam.
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
So is Daniher, they'd want to trade for Harto.
but it wont cos they can get him for free. hes not restricted
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
It's a good point, but on a small incentive based deal he's probably a better option than Murphy.
- Sep 28, 2016
- 10,133
- 20,418
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #2,872
If you were a list manager it could be argued that trajectory wise Gibbs at 29 and Orazio at 25 have comparable estimated games left in them after this season based on the 3 years before each respective club move.
I think the most wildly optimistic hoped we could squeeze 100 games out of Bryce. If we got Orazio i'd set the over/under at 40. And i'd be taking the under!
I don’t know about Daniher’s situation, but to be fair (and I’ve mentioned it before), Essendon had a “pump you full of painkillers and deal with your injuries later, just get out there and play” policy” a year or two back (not sure about now). That is why Fantasia is where he is at and it almost ruined Hooker. Could be the same for Daniher.
That’s what I was told anyway.
Murphy isn't in our best 22 with fit and in form Stengle/McAdam. Himmelberg, Fog, Stengle, McAdam, Lynch, rotating mid spot. Then there's the small issue that we seem fixated on 3 key forwards. So we've already lost the rotating mid spot and are structured with 6 pure forwards.
- Sep 28, 2016
- 10,133
- 20,418
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #2,875
His trade cost is probably 1% of what stresses me about Fantasia! Maybe less
- Status
Similar threads
