- Sep 23, 2019
- 2,150
- 2,428
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Why else would he be exploring other options?that's not obvious at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why else would he be exploring other options?that's not obvious at all.
Because he wants to get a longer contract and more money while he still has currency... Either from us or from Sydney.Why else would he be exploring other options?
One year to run on contract.Why else would he be exploring other options?
Sydney have approached him and are trying to lure him out. Adams is doing what any sensible person would - checking out the offer and then doing a pros and cons assessment, probably weighing up what is best for him and his future. Adams didn’t initiate it and the club isn’t begrudging him for considering Sydney’s offer.Why else would he be exploring other options?
Oh yeah but If I did it I'd be arrested!!!Get Ed to tag along with Pendles all summer and he'll be the Rising Star next year
They aren’t begrudging it because they know in their heart of hearts that he’s spent. He’ll free up salary cap space and significantly contribute to reducing turnovers.Sydney have approached him and are trying to lure him out. Adams is doing what any sensible person would - checking out the offer and then doing a pros and cons assessment, probably weighing up what is best for him and his future. Adams didn’t initiate it and the club isn’t begrudging him for considering Sydney’s offer.
Big fan of Adam, but yeah, agree with you.While think he still has a contribution to make, also I think it would be in the club's interest to let Adams go. Now part of the 30+ brigade and if we can turn this trade into a younger version that would be useful.
Why would they be sniffing around, unless they had an approach on the quiet from either him or his manager.Sydney have approached him and are trying to lure him out. Adams is doing what any sensible person would - checking out the offer and then doing a pros and cons assessment, probably weighing up what is best for him and his future. Adams didn’t initiate it and the club isn’t begrudging him for considering Sydney’s offer.
Unpopular opinion, but kind of true.They aren’t begrudging it because they know in their heart of hearts that he’s spent. He’ll free up salary cap space and significantly contribute to reducing turnovers.
Maybe. The fact is that he is not making Collingwood a better side next year, and even he knows it.One year to run on contract.
No negotiations to extend that contract.
And no guarantee that it would be extended.
At his age and physical condition, the club would only commit to exploring an extension or a new contract during the next season. And had he asked that would be the stock answer.
One thing not explored is the possibility that he has a trigger in current contract for an extension. This would ask so mean no negotiations entered into or even required. Maybe he is worried about not meeting that trigger
He was very clearly best 23 in the role he was assigned to in 2023, in which he played every single game he was available for.Why else would he be exploring other options?
Clubs and list managers approach opposition player managers all the time - gauging interest, testing the waters, what would it take kind of conversations happen all the time. Don’t know if you don’t ask …Why would they be sniffing around, unless they had an approach on the quiet from either him or his manager.
I didn’t use the past tense. I said he’s no longer in our best 23. That means 24’He was very clearly best 23 in the role he was assigned to in 2023, in which he played every single game he was available for.
Top 5 in league for goal-assists this season. Your original post that he was pushed out of our 23 was laughable.
An expensive contingency plan considering he’s injured more often than most.Unpopular opinion, but kind of true.
Thing is, if Mitchell go's down...
So he's being randomly dropped from our best 23 after a good season for no reason other than your baseless assumptions?I didn’t use the past tense. I said he’s no longer in our best 23. That means 24’
He is no longer in our best 23. Injury plagued and slow. I’d be more sentimental if he was a one club player, but he isn’t.
Change is inevitable after a flag, win or lose. You can afford to be bolder after a win. If you don’t evolve you regress. Changes need to be made. He’s not as important as many think. We won a premiership without him after all. You can only have so many 30+ year olds in a side.So he's being randomly dropped from our best 23 after a good season for no reason other than your baseless assumptions?
He certainly does with me, I’m really against this move. We won’t get much for him at his age…much rather have him on the list contributing to our next premiership.His granite like hardness will be missed. Was a big reason GWS was able to stay in the contest for so long.
Adams probably doesn’t get the credit he deserves.
I don’t have a problem with him, I hope he makes it, but the constant suggestion that he’ll seamlessly replace adams when he hasn’t demanded selection is fanciful.By pulling his hair out from sheer frustration?
I find it strange Sydney want him considering his age and has a year to go on his contract. I can’t see a scenario where Sydney think they want an inside mid and approach him.
It could only be Adams approaching Sydney or we’ve told him we won’t resign him at the end of this contract so go find yourself another team if you can this year.
Clueless.He is no longer in our best 23. Injury plagued and slow. I’d be more sentimental if he was a one club player, but he isn’t.