Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The irreversible damage drugs cause in the body aren't a soft science like psychology.
Oh
Sigh.....
Do you really think after this week we need MORE illuminating on why people find him divisive?
It was a comparison on how well Betts does the same thing and has a unifying influence and in comparison to Wilson's diatribe yesterday, it's showing clearly that its not the cause that has "divided " people.
Headline kind of helps if you're unsure
Eddie Betts and Adam Goodes have the same mission but are tackling it different ways, writes Dwayne Russell
Spoken like a psychology student there - more time spent validating itself as a science than developing the science.Yeah, I edited my post, forgot to mention I have a major in addiction studies, Mr. Armchair Expert. Also, spoken like a person who's never studied psychology.
Bigots with power?Psych student (4th year) with a major in addiction studies. I think the war on drugs is a joke and I am furious we aren't seriously looking at the Portuguese harm reduction model that decriminalises personal drug use. They treat addiction as a public health issue and not a criminal one. There is substantial evidence - the British Journal of Criminology, among them, to show how effective the model has been (a 50% drop in addiction rates). I think fixing the way our country deals with drug users would go a long way to helping fight the systemic racism Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders are faced with, because right now, bigots with power are having a field day and I'm disgusted that people are making excuses for them.
I think though the Crows are closer to reality and have a better understanding of the indigenous plight and more care for their issues. They are more likely to speak for the heart, be direct and transparent
Remember the Swans focus on Sydney property prices which are distant to indigenous issues and guys like Packer surely have more care for the Asian dollar and his casino revenue than the sustainability of the indigenous in this country. Swans and their stakeholders are more likely to pay lip service, offer smoke and mirrors, a greek referendum, so with smoke and mirrors the indigenous look as though they are cared for with the odd casino job, or a politicians job for a sole indigenous person as a beacon for BS,but ultimately the Narungga people and the interests of the Sydney elite are very different. Donald Trump looks to have done more for indigenous in USA recently than the Sydney elite have ever done for the indigenous in vast regions of Australia including the Narungga people where Goodes has links to, so largely the indigenous people in substance are thrown under a bus by the elite, while at the same time blowing wind up Goodes's but so they can claim they are nice.
I would like to see some aboriginal leaders maybe speak at the Geelong game before the bounce .....
And do a welcome to country ...if you do t know what a welcome to country is google it
It basically welcomes us into indigenous lands and thanks them for allowing us to be here .....remember people they were here for 40,000 years before we arrived
We need to accurate the general population on what aboriginal culture is about .....I take groups of white kids into lower socio economic areas with many aboriginal kids about ...we bets ken footys and basketballs out and wWay we go ....cook some bush tucker afterwards and we eat and yarn
It's part of the job I do and it has effects ......
So when that white kid plays footy in the local team he might know those kids and vice versa
And lastly this is the point isn't ....do we want our kids growing up booing people at footy games .....I lie how Nathan Buckley put it
There is enough social negativity already with drug smuggling crime and family violence ......can't we just go to the footy and be happy? How hard is it
The guy on the left looks like Gillon.
Spoken like a psychology student there - more time spent validating itself as a science than developing the science.
Bigots with power?
It was a comparison on how well Betts does the same thing and has a unifying influence and in comparison to Wilson's diatribe yesterday, it's showing clearly that its not the cause that has "divided " people.
I think though the Crows are closer to reality and have a better understanding of the indigenous plight and more care for their issues. They are more likely to speak for the heart, be direct and transparent
Remember the Swans focus on Sydney property prices which are distant to indigenous issues and guys like Packer surely have more care for the Asian dollar and his casino revenue than the sustainability of the indigenous in this country. Swans and their stakeholders are more likely to pay lip service, a greek referendum, so with smoke and mirrors the indigenous look as though they are cared for with the odd casino job, or a politicians job for a sole indigenous person as a beacon for BS,but ultimately the Narungga people and the interests of the Sydney elite are very different. Donald Trump looks to have done more for indigenous in USA recently than the Sydney elite have ever done for the indigenous in vast regions of Australia including the Narungga people where Goodes has links to, so largely the indigenous people in substance are thrown under a bus by the elite, while at the same time blowing wind up Goodes's but so they can claim they are nice.
They were ?
More rewriting of history !
I studied a couple years of Psych at Uni and some of the biggest whack jobs I ever encountered were Psych academics. Later on while working in Uni admin at another Uni I had dealings with more Psych academics - and let's just say it seems a field of academic endeavor prone to recruiting more than its share of eccentrics or lost people on a journey of self-discovery.Yeah, I edited my post, forgot to mention I have a major in addiction studies, Mr. Armchair Expert. Also, spoken like a person who's never studied psychology.
Indeed they were. History speaks for itself.
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/collingwood-v-sydney-live-chat-in-op-rd-9-2013.1007911/page-22
Where have I rewritten history?
To add to this, funnily enough, everyone was in support of Goodes' actions on the night of the Collingwood vs Sydney game. In fact, everyone was labeling him a champion, so the whole 13 year old girl excuse is rubbish, as they were either in support of it initially anyway, or they couldn't tell she was that young either.
Everyone ...EVERYONE ?
And then you quote a internet forum post ...
EVERYONE ?????
Seriously.....
To which you are entitledI don't think Russell makes a fair comparison tbh. Betts is doing his thing for Indigenous kids and Goodes does that too as I understand it. The things that Goodes does that draws attention for being divisive is something Betts doesn't do, which tackle the broader issue of racism in society. Not a great article IMO.
I studied a couple years of Psych at Uni and some of the biggest whack jobs I ever encountered were Psych academics. Later on while working in Uni admin at another Uni I had dealings with more Psych academics - and let's just say it seems a field of academic endeavor prone to recruiting more than its share of eccentrics or lost people on a journey of self-discovery.
That's been my experience. I don't say you are like them, nor do I say it to denigrate your earlier comments which I wholeheartedly agree with.
Lol. The point is the same. Please provide an example of people who were not in support of Goodes.
More strawman. I've actually acknowledged the history of ape being used to vilify, but I do question the long history of the term being used to verbally vilify Indigenous Australians. I've heard a long list of words used to deride Indigenous people before, but I've never heard that one. Hence I question it.
Faaark me! You are kidding right? I made a statement about footballers in general, to which you replied "the difference is calling an indigenous person an 'ape' has a long history". And now you claim you didn't differentiate. Get a grip!
Although, in his SBS interview with Stan Grant talking about pointing out the source of the "ape" jeer, Goodes said he probably wouldn't hesitate to do the same thing again.No one should be taking the high ground on this matter, errors have been made on all sides. None is squeaky clean.
All sides can look back and see things they would have done differently if they had their time again.