The "We must get Tom Lynch at all costs...or maybe not" Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
That bloke already covered his bases a few pages back. If Lynch goes to tigers, then he was right all along. If he goes somewhere else then there will be the classic blame shift with "He back flipped on us at the last moment". John Edwards made a living with this cold read, carnival shtick for years.

You need to attend to your auto correct- it changed 'flog' to 'bloke' in your post.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bucks on SEN stating Fasolo to be offered a new contract by Pies. If Lynch was a certainty to the Pies then I would have thought Fasolo's new contract would be a salary cap problem when juggling the books for Lynch.
 
I'm going to stick with Ed not showing his cards until we've well and truly played them. Poker face right now.

They could be going after Gaff for all we know. Good opportunity to replace a weak link.

Huh...

Treloar, Adams, Pendles, De Goey, Sidey, Phillips, Sier not cutting for ya mate??
 
Bucks on SEN stating Fasolo to be offered a new contract by Pies. If Lynch was a certainty to the Pies then I would have thought Fasolo's new contract would be a salary cap problem when juggling the books for Lynch.

Not sure he ever mentioned Fasolo other than saying "yep" when asked at his press conference whether or not he was a required player?
 
Bucks on SEN stating Fasolo to be offered a new contract by Pies. If Lynch was a certainty to the Pies then I would have thought Fasolo's new contract would be a salary cap problem when juggling the books for Lynch.
Or the club is hoping to push up Carlton’s offer so we get better compo....
 
They have a wicked case of "confirmation bias" over there. It goes well with their scorching case of herpes.

Why don’t you come over and have a chat about it? We’ve had some great discussion with some posters on your board. It’s been very civil and good natured
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I meant Richmond could be going after Gaff. Apologies if I wasn't clear.
Well Richmond (Dimma) has indicated they wish to continue improving their list.
So whether it’s Lynch or some other high profile recruit...they are setting up their list & cap to fit somebody in.
Maybe Lynch, maybe Gaff, maybe Beams, maybe Shiel. Who knows.
 
Why don’t you come over and have a chat about it? We’ve had some great discussion with some posters on your board. It’s been very civil and good natured
I've been on your board once recently. It was when several of your posters openly accused DeGoey of being out recently because he had 3 strikes, all hidden under the guise of it being "word on the street". I think I'll pass.
 
Why don't we go after Gaff? He is absolute quality.
A boxing glove?

Not so sure we should.
All his crap now will follow him and be a distraction we just don’t need
 
Well Richmond (Dimma) has indicated they wish to continue improving their list.
So whether it’s Lynch or some other high profile recruit...they are setting up their list & cap to fit somebody in.
Maybe Lynch, maybe Gaff, maybe Beams, maybe Shiel. Who knows.
Stating the bleeding obvious but doesnt every footy department wish to keep improving their list...well apart from Carlton of course.
 
Bucks on SEN stating Fasolo to be offered a new contract by Pies. If Lynch was a certainty to the Pies then I would have thought Fasolo's new contract would be a salary cap problem when juggling the books for Lynch.
What are you talking about? Bucks was on SEN this morning on Whateley, and nothing was said of Fasolo.

Saying "yep" in his weekly presser to if Fasolo is a required player is hardly a revelation, but it has no bearing on if he gets a new contract. What's Bucks going to say to that question?
 
Stating the bleeding obvious but doesnt every footy department wish to keep improving their list...well apart from Carlton of course.
You get a like for the Carlton comment
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top