The "We must get Tom Lynch at all costs...or maybe not" Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

What are you talking about? Bucks was on SEN this morning on Whateley, and nothing was said of Fasolo.

Saying "yep" in his weekly presser to if Fasolo is a required player is hardly a revelation, but it has no bearing on if he gets a new contract. What's Bucks going to say to that question?
Sorry for the ambiguity.SEN hourly news report had an extract from Bucks Press Conference indicating Fasolo was a required player.I would assume an uncontracted required player would be subject to contract renegotiation.AFL Website & Collingwood Website both confirming above. Agree logical answer would be "Yes" from Bucks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Cause I suggested an early bird spring racing carnival thread for all of us racing enthusiasts.. don't take it out on me re. Unfbelievable re
No
I’m advocating your genius beauty profound inspiration all is so good you shouldn’t work With peasants like Andy Maher
 
Only question that really needs to be asked here is what number will Tommy wear at pies in 2019. My bet is number 11
 
Bucks on SEN stating Fasolo to be offered a new contract by Pies. If Lynch was a certainty to the Pies then I would have thought Fasolo's new contract would be a salary cap problem when juggling the books for Lynch.

Fasolo won’t be at Collingwood next year. What do you expect bucks to say “ yeah he isn’t required and going through the motions in vfl until he is allowed to go as an unrestricted player”. Of course he is going to say he is required. If he really was required he wouldn’t be in the vfl the last 5 while we played brown daicos ahead of him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top