Mods can we just permaban this poster from the board? Adds no value and is just a pathetic keyboard warrior.I hate asking this but is it really true that boys in Tassie shag their sisters?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mods can we just permaban this poster from the board? Adds no value and is just a pathetic keyboard warrior.I hate asking this but is it really true that boys in Tassie shag their sisters?
He's a dickhead. The only concern in the forward line is Jack aging. But which teams have 2 gun KPFs? Maybe Geelong but Porkins is no spring chicken. With Hopper and Taranto in the midfield Dusty and Bolton will spend more time forward. Then we have Cumberland, MRJ who are pups with lots of improvement to come. Barrett is a flog, it's probably one of the most dangerous forward lines in the comp if our midfield gives it the delivery.
they hate us cos they anusYou’ve gotta laugh. Geelong’s strategy doesn’t allow for long term deals, but does allow giving away 3 x first round draft picks and a 5-year deal for 28yo Cameron. Cameron will be 2-years older than these guys when his huge contract ends.
Not saying Geelong made a mistake, but I’d rather give 2 x 25yo that cost 3 x first round picks a 7-year deal than 1 x 28yo that cost 3 x first round picks a 5 year deal….
You get 14+ years total footy out of our deal compared to 5+ out of Cameron.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Our forward line requires and influx of talent so much, We were only the highest scoring team of the yearWhat inane dribble this is
Holes in our backline? D.Rioli took over for Houli in an AA year and we drafted a tall intercept player that had an impact in his first year. We’re having trouble figuring out how to fit Short in the backline and he’s a Jack Dyer medalist
And our forward line? It was rated as one of the best in the comp.. we were 4th on percentage and that was blooding in 2 new players and no Dusty
We’ve done it haven’t we? We’ve finally broken them
It’s a good time to be a tiger
Wait until Rioli plays his first gameOur forward line requires and influx of talent so much, We were only the highest scoring team of the year
He threw the first punch I'm just giving one back and to be frank it is a shite pod. Its immature, amateur and not particularly informative.
I know he has done a lot of work on it buts its got a long way to go still. It comes across as a bunch of nuff nuff Tigers supporter's in a circle jerk.
1. Drop the zoom format and do it as a pure podcast. I don't need to see what T71 looks like
2. Have a maximum of 3 people including yourself each week.
3. Decide what the pod stands for and what its trying to achieve.
4. Get some special guests on.
5. Have a set agenda for the home and away that listeners can relate to.
You are one jealous MOFO! like seriously. What did T71 do to you for you to be such a sad sack? Get a lifeIt was only the start of this week T71 was still saying Hopper was most likely going to Geelong which was the way he was leaning until meeting Dimma and Dusty.
You're a stuffen clown pal with a shite pod.
If its so bad, how about you pull your head out of your rectal passage and start your own! you know have a positive word to say about anyone. Such a negative Nancy. You sit behind your keyboard and piss and moan but I bet you won't make your own podcast. If you dont like it, don't listen. Other people enjoy itHe threw the first punch I'm just giving one back and to be frank it is a shite pod. Its immature, amateur and not particularly informative.
I know he has done a lot of work on it buts its got a long way to go still. It comes across as a bunch of nuff nuff Tigers supporter's in a circle jerk.
1. Drop the zoom format and do it as a pure podcast. I don't need to see what T71 looks like
2. Have a maximum of 3 people including yourself each week.
3. Decide what the pod stands for and what its trying to achieve.
4. Get some special guests on.
5. Have a set agenda for the home and away that listeners can relate to.
Also, I'm sure richo and Jack would love your thought on their home stateI hate asking this but is it really true that boys in Tassie shag their sisters?
Backline that needs an influx of talent?
Balta is what 22 or 23
Miller 23
Gibcus (best kpb in last years draft)
Brown
Banks
All pretty young and talented
Terrible effort by you lolIt was only the start of this week T71 was still saying Hopper was most likely going to Geelong which was the way he was leaning until meeting Dimma and Dusty.
You're a stuffen clown pal with a shite pod.
Equalisation is not about equality of outcome, it’s
about equality of OPPORTUNITY.
Big and important difference.
Saints bring in Hannebery and Hill on a combined $1.6m per season. Carlton bring in McGovern and Martin on a combined $1.5m per season. We bring in TT and Hopper on a combined $1.5m.
It’s not our fault the Saints went for an injured player and a flaky outside wingman. It’s not our fault the Blues went for a forward who’d never kicked more than 30-goals and a flaky flanker. That was their decision.
Saints brought in Ryder, Howard, Crouch on a combined $1.5m. Blues brought in Saad, Cerra and Hewett on $1.7m. We brought in Nank, Prestia and Caddy on a combined $1.5m.
There was equal opportunity …. our club just made better decisions…. although the Blues decisions can still bear fruit.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
It was only the start of this week T71 was still saying Hopper was most likely going to Geelong which was the way he was leaning until meeting Dimma and Dusty.
You're a stuffen clown pal with a shite pod.
Just wanted to double down on the young partYou don't like Rioli? only 25
Should also be noted we have been in Tarantos ear for a number of yearsWe planned this years ago. well not this exact trade. But the general thing of picking up good inside mid/s for a decent price. Can't remember which year but we went for Crouch, he took more $ at the Saints. From then we've been banking $500K per year for this deal. That's probably about $2million or so.
How do you bank the $? You pay extra to players early in their contracts in return for less $ later. It can blow up on you if they leave. But supposedly Dusty took more early to give us $ later. Probably 1/2 the list in that basket. Suddenly you have $2mil over 2 or 3 years that you can get from deals with your current players. Add in retirements etc and there is $1.5m per year to get you through until the Dusty and Lynch deals end.
This all means you have to plan ahead and be careful with your deals - salary and trades. Then when you know that a team is hitting a huge salary cap problem and it has lots of mids who you want you're all loaded up to trade. Hello Taranto and Hopper.
Most other clubs get desperate and jump too early or overpay to get someone now. They then have less to spend and fewer draft resources to trade. patience and careful planning = success in this game.
Damien Parrot just said he thinks we’ve offered Hopper 7 years at 800k
I don’t believe 800k for a second
Tiger71 can get confirmation? Surely not 800
He threw the first punch I'm just giving one back and to be frank it is a shite pod. Its immature, amateur and not particularly informative.
I know he has done a lot of work on it buts its got a long way to go still. It comes across as a bunch of nuff nuff Tigers supporter's in a circle jerk.
1. Drop the zoom format and do it as a pure podcast. I don't need to see what T71 looks like
2. Have a maximum of 3 people including yourself each week.
3. Decide what the pod stands for and what its trying to achieve.
4. Get some special guests on.
5. Have a set agenda for the home and away that listeners can relate to.
We planned this years ago. well not this exact trade. But the general thing of picking up good inside mid/s for a decent price. Can't remember which year but we went for Crouch, he took more $ at the Saints. From then we've been banking $500K per year for this deal. That's probably about $2million or so.
How do you bank the $? You pay extra to players early in their contracts in return for less $ later. It can blow up on you if they leave. But supposedly Dusty took more early to give us $ later. Probably 1/2 the list in that basket. Suddenly you have $2mil over 2 or 3 years that you can get from deals with your current players. Add in retirements etc and there is $1.5m per year to get you through until the Dusty and Lynch deals end.
This all means you have to plan ahead and be careful with your deals - salary and trades. Then when you know that a team is hitting a huge salary cap problem and it has lots of mids who you want you're all loaded up to trade. Hello Taranto and Hopper.
Most other clubs get desperate and jump too early or overpay to get someone now. They then have less to spend and fewer draft resources to trade. patience and careful planning = success in this game.
He threw the first punch I'm just giving one back and to be frank it is a shite pod. Its immature, amateur and not particularly informative.
I know he has done a lot of work on it buts its got a long way to go still. It comes across as a bunch of nuff nuff Tigers supporter's in a circle jerk.
1. Drop the zoom format and do it as a pure podcast. I don't need to see what T71 looks like
2. Have a maximum of 3 people including yourself each week.
3. Decide what the pod stands for and what its trying to achieve.
4. Get some special guests on.
5. Have a set agenda for the home and away that listeners can relate to.
Could Crows come to the GWS-Richmond party in terms of offering our Pick 6?
GWS have asked for 2 x 1st round picks for Taranto, and 1 x Top 10 Pick for Hopper. Both of those valuations seem pretty spot on.
After F/S bids, I anticipate Richmond's picks will turn into 12, 21 and 32 (i think? 3 x F/S in the top 30)
Crows could offer Pick 6 to Richmond for 12, 21 & 32 and you ontrade that to GWS.
Leaves GWS with Pick 4 and Pick 6 in this draft. That gets you Taranto OR Hopper.
Who gets pushed out at Richmond?
Could we do a 2023 1st round Pick Swap between Richmond and us where Richmond send us a few experienced players? Crows could certainly do with them.
If Richmond have our future 1st you'd imagine that would satisfy GWS for the other trade with Hopper or Taranto..
Imagine being this offended about being wrong.
Poor form.
are you insane?
Why would be give you 12 21 and 32 for pick 6?
You blokes need pick 6 for Rankine though.Could Crows come to the GWS-Richmond party in terms of offering our Pick 6?
GWS have asked for 2 x 1st round picks for Taranto, and 1 x Top 10 Pick for Hopper. Both of those valuations seem pretty spot on.
After F/S bids, I anticipate Richmond's picks will turn into 12, 21 and 32 (i think? 3 x F/S in the top 30)
Crows could offer Pick 6 to Richmond for 12, 21 & 32 and you ontrade that to GWS.
Leaves GWS with Pick 4 and Pick 6 in this draft. That gets you Taranto OR Hopper.
Who gets pushed out at Richmond?
Could we do a 2023 1st round Pick Swap between Richmond and us where Richmond send us a few experienced players? Crows could certainly do with them.
If Richmond have our future 1st you'd imagine that would satisfy GWS for the other trade with Hopper or Taranto..