Opinion INTERNATIONAL Politics: Adelaide Board Discussion Part 5

[Eagleboy2011]

Where do the Dems find the likes AOC to represent them.


Colombian coffee ffs.


note. Starbucks uses only Brazil coffees.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Not arguing against they are illegal, but you claiming they are rapists, etc is just making shit up!

Kane,Kane,Kane

They are just good misunderstood people.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Where do the Dems find the likes AOC to represent them.


Colombian coffee ffs.


note. Starbucks uses only Brazil coffees.

Columbian coffee is a major export to USA, so will impact on coffee prices, though gather USA will look to source more coffees from other countries where there are no tariffs as 50% more would become unviable.

May not impact on Starbucks, but you are kidding yourself if there isn't going to be any impact...

Increase in world tariffs will ultimately increase inflation.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Kane,Kane,Kane

They are just good misunderstood people.

That's 4 people out of 2 plane loads!

Seriously... you really think that most of the 2 plane loads were hardened criminals...

Not denying they are illegals, but you are doing some serious projecting.

Normally the USA would keep the terrorists locked up, rather than sending them back to get up to no good.
.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Columbian coffee is a major export to USA, so will impact on coffee prices, though gather USA will look to source more coffees from other countries where there are no tariffs as 50% more would become unviable.

May not impact on Starbucks, but you are kidding yourself if there isn't going to be any impact...

Increase in world tariffs will ultimately increase inflation.

Centrist Kane

comparing cost of coffee vs Safety of US citizens hard choice.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

That's 4 people out of 2 plane loads!

Seriously... you really think that most of the 2 plane loads were hardened criminals...

Not denying they are illegals, but you are doing some serious projecting.

Normally the USA would keep the terrorists locked up, rather than sending them back to get up to no good.
.

I agree. i said "They are just good misunderstood people."

You're not serious on that last one.
Normally they would not have got into the country unchecked. Thanks Genocide Joe and Mayorkas.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Centrist Kane

comparing cost of coffee vs Safety of US citizens hard choice.

Where did I compare them? Once again you are protecting.

If these 4 are truly terrorists, why would the USA be allowing them to return home, when normally they would lock up international terrorists? It doesn't make sense if they are truly dangerous to let them free.

I gather the vast majority of illegals are not dangerous to USA citizens... but I understand it is the right of USA to send them home as it is the right of Columbia that they are sent home in a humane way.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Where did I compare them? Once again you are protecting.

If these 4 are truly terrorists, why would the USA be allowing them to return home, when normally they would lock up international terrorists? It doesn't make sense if they are truly dangerous to let them free.

I gather the vast majority of illegals are not dangerous to USA citizens... but I understand it is the right of USA to send them home as it is the right of Columbia that they are sent home in a humane way.

Where have I heard that argument before. Mostly good.

Are you Martha

‘Do you hear yourself'​

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Where have I heard that argument before.

Are you Martha

‘Do you hear yourself'​

So you are not going to address any of my points?

Why would the USA want to release alleged dangerous terrorists? Normally they go out of their way to lock them up in a secure US facility.

Just think about the number of dangerous international criminals the US have extradited over the years at great cost... so if these 4 are dangerous, why are they allowing them to return free to Columbia?

 

[Mutineer]

That's 4 people out of 2 plane loads!

Seriously... you really think that most of the 2 plane loads were hardened criminals...

Not denying they are illegals, but you are doing some serious projecting.

Normally the USA would keep the terrorists locked up, rather than sending them back to get up to no good.
.

Why are you defending illegals at all....don't bother answering we know the answer Lefty.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

For those actually interested, Columbian exports to USA include Oil $6B, Coffee $1.8B, cut flowers $1.6B.

So if the tariffs go ahead, you would expect many of these items will be sourced from other countries without tariffs.

Colombia

The United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) was signed on November 22, 2006. Colombia's Congress approved the CTPA and a protocol of amendment in 2007. Colombia's Constitutional Court compfleted its review in July 2008, and concluded that the Agreement conforms to Colombia's...

ustr.gov

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Why are you defending illegals at all....don't bother answering we know the answer Lefty.

Where have I defended them retunrubt thr illegals Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!

Perhaps you could help out EB as to why the USA would free 4 supposed terrorists.

 

[Mutineer]

Where have I defended them Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!

Can you point me to where in the very very short time The Trump Administration has been in control where these inhumane practices have taken place?

Removing illegal immigrants that have no right being there is inhumane?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Can you point me to where in the very very short time The Trump Administration has been in control where these inhumane practices have taken place?

Removing illegal immigrants that have no right being there is inhumane?

Shackling them on military planes. Was in the article is posted in the international thread. I'll tag you in.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Where have I defended them retunrubt thr illegals Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!

Perhaps you could help out EB as to why the USA would free 4 supposed terrorists.

Send them to Gitmo so the next Biden and Obama will release them. Good thinking.

 

[Mutineer]

Shackling them on military planes. Was in the article is posted in the international thread. I'll tag you in.

Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Appears Columbia will accept immigrants returning unshackled in passenger flights, but not shackled in military flights.

Seems a reasonable request to me...

Trump hits Colombia with tariffs after deportation flights turned back

The US president has ordered emergency tariffs and a travel ban on officials after a decision by Colombian President Gustavo Petro to reject flights of repatriated migrants from America.

www.abc.net.au

Here you go Mutineer

Columbia will accept their illegals if returned humanely. Do you have a problem with this?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Send them to Gitmo so the next Biden and Obama will release them. Good thinking.

So why have the USA locked up many of the most dangerous criminals, but OK to release these 4? Can't see the contradiction...

 

[Mutineer]

Here you go Mutineer

Columbia will accept their illegals if returned humanely. Do you have a problem with this?

I'm still waiting for you to show me these inhumane practices...it is not inhumane to shackle a prisoner which these illegals are.

 

[ringo200]

Hopefully there is an exemption declared for this program which was implemented by Bush and has been a huge success.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goats-and-soda/2025/01/25/g-s1-44762/pepfar-trump-hiv-foreign-aid

Even if it is just the 90 days the effects could be long term.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?

Australia & other Westen Countries don't shackle illegals when they return them on passenger flights... & the accepting county don't usually have an issue.

Why do you fabour inhumane methods?

 

[Eagleboy2011]

So why have the USA locked up many of the most dangerous criminals, but OK to release these 4? Can't see the contradiction...

You do realize they are Illegals and criminal. Not just 4 that I used as a quick example. Have a look who Tom Homan said he is prioritizing. You are just grandstanding.

 

[Mutineer]

Australia & other Westen Countries don't shackle illegals when they return them on passenger flights... & the accepting county don't usually have an issue.

Why do you fabour inhumane methods?

Yeah those in control of these illegal criminals on these flights should give them all a hug and sit in circles singing Kumbaya...yeah OK.

 

[Eagleboy2011]

Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?

I'm sure violent criminals will be well behaved on a flight.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Yeah those in control of these illegal criminals on these flights should give them all a hug and sit in circles singing Kumbaya...yeah OK.

No, but the shackling is unnecessary as just put them on the plane & send them back.

Says more about you than you think shacking is appropriate.