So the undocumented labour in Europe will apply for H-1B visas so that they can be exploited in the USA instead of Europe?I mean no
Sorry, what policy are we discussing? And can you quote where you believe my position on that policy differs to yours.
I mean... he'll be an absolutely appalling POTUS, will weaken international relations and frameworks with allies and on available evidence thus far will accelerate the upwards distribution of wealth even more than currently. Doesn't seem ideal.
No idea what you're talking about here - wasn't your argument that Trump will remain in power after his 4 years in some kind of undemocratic coup? Of course the courts aren't going to prevent JD running or winning an election, its just the idea that Trump would particularly care about that happening which is perplexing. In fact if he or his are no longer involved in government and there's no more threat of legal action against him I'd actually suspect he'd prefer a Democrat victory after he's done, adds to his narcissist/only one who can fix it mythos.
lol - Trump's first 2 years, 2016-2018?
Basically. The amount of funding and manpower he needs to do it he won't get, and the knock-on effects to business would be catastrophic. And he doesn't really care about doing it - as we've already seen, he's a bit less fussed about immigrants now that he's won than you would have been led to believe on the campaign trail.
Yes mate I believe I literally used the phrase' business as usual' in relation to this. Try actually reading the thread, it helps
I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to be clinging to in your version of events. You appear to no longer be forming coherent responses based on what others are actually saying, rather it looks like you're just seeing a few trigger words and mashing the keyboard
Trump does, ironically enough
for someone who's always banging on about slavery he seems reasonably blaise about it if it's just a whisker shy of.
So history will repeat itself is all you are clinging onto yeah ?I mean... he'll be an absolutely appalling POTUS, will weaken international relations and frameworks with allies and on available evidence thus far will accelerate the upwards distribution of wealth even more than currently. Doesn't seem ideal.
No idea what you're talking about here - wasn't your argument that Trump will remain in power after his 4 years in some kind of undemocratic coup? Of course the courts aren't going to prevent JD running or winning an election, its just the idea that Trump would particularly care about that happening which is perplexing. In fact if he or his are no longer involved in government and there's no more threat of legal action against him I'd actually suspect he'd prefer a Democrat victory after he's done, adds to his narcissist/only one who can fix it mythos.
lol - Trump's first 2 years, 2016-2018?
I mean he got his tax cuts for the rich through, but how did his signature policy (the wall) go during that stretch? Its actually one of the main things I'm basing my thoughts on regarding his deporting of 12 million illegals being a complete furphy.
Basically. The amount of funding and manpower he needs to do it he won't get, and the knock-on effects to business would be catastrophic. And he doesn't really care about doing it - as we've already seen, he's a bit less fussed about immigrants now that he's won than you would have been led to believe on the campaign trail.
You're not worried about unelected billionaires controlling policy via their proximity to the president? lol ok, but as I said one of the main things that looks like happening in this scenario is an even greater disparity in wealth distribution, upwards. At least some in MAGA seem to be waking up to that at least, every chance Leon and Vivek are cast aside within a few months imo. But maybe not, Trump doesn't have to worry about re-election after all.
Yes mate I believe I literally used the phrase' business as usual' in relation to this. Try actually reading the thread, it helps
I'm not even sure what I'm supposed to be clinging to in your version of events. You appear to no longer be forming coherent responses based on what others are actually saying, rather it looks like you're just seeing a few trigger words and mashing the keyboard
There you go mate, don't keep it bottled up let that cooker flag fly loud and proud
If you wanna compare child slavery, slavery in places like Qatar which resulted in thousands of deaths to the plight of US farm workers, you are just being deliberately demonsrative
Would appreciate a response to this one mate
Any time you're ready
Depends where it is I guess. You wanted more war and boots on the ground in Afghanistan from Biden, remember?
This is one of the main things I don't get about your take mate - do you mean he's simply going to get term limits abolished/extended and contest another election in '28? As opposed to remaining in power without an election?
Deporting 12 million or singing koombaya with them being the only 2 options of course
I think it isnt established yet. Wouldnt say one way or the other.
The president cant achieve anything he is trying too is more bizarre then anything im throwing downDeporting 12 million or singing koombaya with them being the only 2 options of course
This is another weird thing you are doing, this nuance-free all or nothing framing. Bizarre, and telling imo as to the veracity of your arguments.
No mate, the "too hard" was in relation to deporting 12 million illegals. He'll definitely do some, a much much smaller number than that then back off it - requires too much manpower, disruption of day to day law enforcement and impact on business, as I've said a few times now.
So he will, or he won't... in your opinion?
He has literally said he will use the military and not law enforcement.No mate, the "too hard" was in relation to deporting 12 million illegals. He'll definitely do some, a much much smaller number than that then back off it - requires too much manpower, disruption of day to day law enforcement and impact on business, as I've said a few times now.
I've also said I don't think he'll rig the electorate by removing US citizens that form 2-3% of the democrat voting base - coz he can't, legally. You appear to have some off the wall thoughts about how he'd circumvent that which I don't buy for a second, like I said we'll see I guess.
Seriously - if you're going to engage like you have the last few days can you actually start reading what people are posting? I don't think its too much to ask
The cost and manpower required to do it.
12 million was the figure bandied around during the campaign.
Finally some rational concrete policy detail on how this all might be achieved, bless you Easty
