- Dec 6, 2020
- 3,422
- 7,299
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
ThanksGimme 30 mins
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
ThanksGimme 30 mins
It’s funny how the bloke they didn’t want as part of the trade saved them from what would’ve been a complete disaster. Chris Masten and Tonny Notte were the players they picked and even with Kennedy turning out the great kpf it’s still a net loss in my opinion. Chris Judd is the top 3 player of the last 20 years.That draft top 10 wasn’t the quality of 2018. Carlton got priority pick and had pick 1 as well which they weren’t willing to trade under any circumstances.
Pick 20 used on a bloke that played not much more than about 2 games and had a bunch of fitness issues. Very little talent in the second round. Not comparable.
I agree though when you look at the trades we certainly could have extracted more from Neale. At the end of the day 5 and 19 with other pick swaps would have been more than reasonable for mine.
Kennedy's career alone makes that a win for Eagles.It’s funny how the bloke they didn’t want as part of the trade saved them from what would’ve been a complete disaster. Chris Masten and Tonny Notte were the players they picked and even with Kennedy turning out the great kpf it’s still a net loss in my opinion. Chris Judd is the top 3 player of the last 20 years.
Isn’t hindsight beautiful
Chris Judd is the greatest draft selection of all time and I doubt anything is close.Kennedy's career alone makes that a win for Eagles.
I'd take 4 flags to be shittily run. Now we're just shittily run with no flags.Chris Judd is the greatest draft selection of all time and I doubt anything is close.
Draft pick 3 who is instantly basically a top 10 player in the AFL and wins a brownlow in his 2nd year (lol). Win a flag with said player then trade him for a 700 goal KPF and a 200 game player (who most think was s**t but 200 games is 200 games).
It is my crutch to rely on when people say WC are so incredibly run - sure but there's been a little bit of luck involved. Lets see when their next flag is
Normally I would have agreed if the midfielder involved was a one notch down in class and to an extent the 2018 premiership probably saved Eagles (Judd was long gone by then) however it’s about the generational talent that is quite rare that Judd was. Judd will be remembered as one of the best players of his era and is in the same class as GAJ and Franklin. Kennedy won’t and doesn’t belong in that group even as good a forward as he was.Kennedy's career alone makes that a win for Eagles.
Yep,Eagles most certainly won the Judd trade. They got a superstar KPF which is a lot harder to find than a superstar midfielder and he was a big part of their success and winning a flag. Judd won a Brownlow at Carlton but did nothing else. They were a rabble.
Yeah sucks doesn't it? Did enough to win and butchered it.What if Fremantle kicked straight during the 2013 AFL Grand Final?
Did a Dockers great cost his club its only flag?www.zerohanger.com
According to Champion Data – the official supplier of statistics for the AFL – Fremantle should have won the 2013 decider by a margin of six points.
As numerically minded folk, you would expect the aforementioned company to show their working, and that is just what analyst Glenn Luff did in February of 2014.
“Based on the AFL average across the shots that they had, Freo should have won,'' Luff told The Herald Sun.
“It felt like Hawthorn was in control for most of the game, but you look at the raw numbers and it was all pretty close.
“Hawthorn nailed them and Freo didn't.''
After examining the distance and angle at each shot was taken, as well as the perceived pressure each kicker was under, Champion Data concluded that had the Dockers taken their chances, the final scoreboard would have read 14.10 (94) to 12.10 (88) in their favour.
This final scoreline is even starker in the cold light of day when you consider that in reality, Fremantle's half-time total of 12 points was at that stage the lowest score for any side at that stage of a grand final for 53 years.
With Fremantle producing five more shots on goal than Hawthorn – 29 to 24 – Luff and his team placed a sizeable portion of the blame at the feet of Hayden Ballantyne and Nat Fyfe, as the pair combined for just under a quarter of the Dockers' total shots (7), yet only managed a paltry 0.3 between them.
The umpires giving away free kicks and 50m penalties to Hawthorn didn’t help either. On the other foot, two post game suspensions for Hawks resulted in a shot on goal (Cyril goal) and Walters not getting a 50m penalty.Taking chances is not just luck. It’s a skill.
It’s a combination of who has the best technique, routine, mental strength, composure, big occassion temperament and execution.
Unfortunately we weren’t good enough in that area on the day.
Champion Data concluded that had the Dockers taken their chances, the final scoreboard would have read 14.10 (94) to 12.10 (88) in their favour.
Haha should be 12 (10) - 82Am I the only one who sees the error here?
Yes and no. I reckon the phrase "it's just another game" was said too much in the locker rooms during the week and it had an adverse affect on the players' psyche. Pure speculation on my part though.Got to blame the players, bad kicking is bad football. Fyfe & Ballas were the main culprits
Taking chances is not just luck. It’s a skill.
It’s a combination of who has the best technique, routine, mental strength, composure, big occassion temperament and execution.
Unfortunately we weren’t good enough in that area on the day.
Vivid flashbacks to Hayden Ballantyne in the fourth quarter just spudding it up in front of goal after the rest of the team had already got their shit together... ****ing hell manWhat if Fremantle kicked straight during the 2013 AFL Grand Final?
Did a Dockers great cost his club its only flag?www.zerohanger.com
According to Champion Data – the official supplier of statistics for the AFL – Fremantle should have won the 2013 decider by a margin of six points.
As numerically minded folk, you would expect the aforementioned company to show their working, and that is just what analyst Glenn Luff did in February of 2014.
“Based on the AFL average across the shots that they had, Freo should have won,'' Luff told The Herald Sun.
“It felt like Hawthorn was in control for most of the game, but you look at the raw numbers and it was all pretty close.
“Hawthorn nailed them and Freo didn't.''
After examining the distance and angle at each shot was taken, as well as the perceived pressure each kicker was under, Champion Data concluded that had the Dockers taken their chances, the final scoreboard would have read 14.10 (94) to 12.10 (88) in their favour.
This final scoreline is even starker in the cold light of day when you consider that in reality, Fremantle's half-time total of 12 points was at that stage the lowest score for any side at that stage of a grand final for 53 years.
With Fremantle producing five more shots on goal than Hawthorn – 29 to 24 – Luff and his team placed a sizeable portion of the blame at the feet of Hayden Ballantyne and Nat Fyfe, as the pair combined for just under a quarter of the Dockers' total shots (7), yet only managed a paltry 0.3 between them.
Champion Data says?Am I the only one who sees the error here?
I put it in the vent thread as i saw the article pop up in google news when i did my daily search on Freo.Is this a 10th anniversary memorial?