- Mar 1, 2005
- 7,753
- 15,746
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- carlton
This is certainly an "upon reflection" question. But somewhere in the questions is a philosophical component.
We had the #1 Choice of the AFL draft, and there truly was an abundance of choice . Amongst them Sam Walsh
, the King brothers, Rankine, Lukosius, Bailey Smith
. Arguably all could have gone number 1 in other draft years.
At the time , the Blues were desperate to build an elite midfield around Cripps and Walsh was seen as the best bet and the most fool proof.
Fast forward to today and we now have Crips, Walsh, Kennedy, Hewitt, Cerra, as the core midfield with many others capable of rotating through such as Doc, Fisher, Martin, williams.
The point is that we seem to have been able to assemble an elite midfield group with seemingly little problem.
Again, arguably, we could survive without Walsh as long as the others stay fit.
Now, with Rankine becoming the Crows most important player, and he being IMO a totally unique talent, having transformed the Crows forward line, would it have been in hindsight better to take Rankine instead of Walsh in 2018. IMO it will be much harder for us to find a Rankine type player- one that would make our forward line unbeatable.
I understand that many will want to defend Walsh to the end, but that is not really the question. Both are phenomenal players. But would we have been better off going with Rankine. There was certainly a few people who wanted to take Rankine at the time
We had the #1 Choice of the AFL draft, and there truly was an abundance of choice . Amongst them Sam Walsh
PLAYERCARDSTART
18
Sam Walsh
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 184cm
- Wt
- 84kg
- Pos.
- Mid
Career
Season
Last 5
- D
- 25.1
- 5star
- K
- 13.5
- 5star
- HB
- 11.6
- 5star
- M
- 5.1
- 5star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- CL
- 3.4
- 5star
No current season stats available
- D
- 26.2
- 5star
- K
- 15.4
- 5star
- HB
- 10.8
- 5star
- M
- 6.0
- 5star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- CL
- 4.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
PLAYERCARDSTART
6
Bailey Smith
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 185cm
- Wt
- 86kg
- Pos.
- M/F
Career
Season
Last 5
- D
- 18.3
- 5star
- K
- 8.5
- 3star
- HB
- 9.8
- 5star
- M
- 2.3
- 2star
- T
- 3.8
- 5star
- CL
- 2.7
- 4star
- D
- 19.8
- 5star
- K
- 9.6
- 4star
- HB
- 10.2
- 5star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 3.2
- 4star
- CL
- 3.2
- 4star
- D
- 14.8
- 4star
- K
- 7.6
- 3star
- HB
- 7.2
- 5star
- M
- 2.0
- 3star
- T
- 3.4
- 5star
- CL
- 1.6
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
At the time , the Blues were desperate to build an elite midfield around Cripps and Walsh was seen as the best bet and the most fool proof.
Fast forward to today and we now have Crips, Walsh, Kennedy, Hewitt, Cerra, as the core midfield with many others capable of rotating through such as Doc, Fisher, Martin, williams.
The point is that we seem to have been able to assemble an elite midfield group with seemingly little problem.
Again, arguably, we could survive without Walsh as long as the others stay fit.
Now, with Rankine becoming the Crows most important player, and he being IMO a totally unique talent, having transformed the Crows forward line, would it have been in hindsight better to take Rankine instead of Walsh in 2018. IMO it will be much harder for us to find a Rankine type player- one that would make our forward line unbeatable.
I understand that many will want to defend Walsh to the end, but that is not really the question. Both are phenomenal players. But would we have been better off going with Rankine. There was certainly a few people who wanted to take Rankine at the time