Elmer_Hauser
Celtics 6-1
Interesting Theory but one almost impossible to prove.
The last 2 mins of that game was pretty wack though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The commentaters saying he told his players no +1 in defence for the last minute.If they were trying to tank, why would they put in the effort to come back from 5 goals down in the first place?
Simpson would have made moves long before that to quell it if that was the case.
Bizarre theory
The commentatrs saying he told his players no +1 in defence for the last minute.
Maybe he got a phone call from above?But again though, if the plan was to tank why put in the effort to get in front with a minute to go?
The game goes for 120+ minutes, not just the bit at the end
Maybe he got a phone call from above?
Less obvious? Yeah ok... what ever lets you sleep at night.If he did it was still less obvious than an interchange infringement with 30 seconds left to go in a game
Doesn't mean he didn't say it before the bounce, just means they didn't lose because of it.Didn't watch the game, but it says they got the winning goal from a centre clearance? So they wouldn't have been able to have an extra back anyway, no?
The commentaters saying he told his players no +1 in defence for the last minute.
My guess would be he would never want to instruct his players to tank so directly, but panicked in the moment because the WC upper mangement would rip his head clean off if they lose pick 1.
Melbourne tanked when they lost after the siren according to everyone, so this isn't really much different.If they were trying to tank, why would they put in the effort to come back from 5 goals down in the first place?
Simpson would have made moves long before that to quell it if that was the case.
Bizarre theory
The level of salt directed at us potentially getting pick 1 despite all the blatant manipulation by the AFL to ensure that their basketcase expansions or perennially povo VFL clubs get a continuous influx of all the best talent is outstanding.
Well, funnily enough, just prior to that Yeo actually got the ball forward and Allen was infringed but not paid, so the setup would've clearly worked if the umpire actually paid the obvious free kick.Seems absurd to me. Apparently they haven't been training for that scenario but focussing on their core plan, so why wouldn't you back yourself to do what had got you into a winning position? They got to that point playing a certain way, they kept playing that way.
Sure, it didn't work out and a more experienced and better drilled side might have been in a position change their ways on a moment's notice.
Explain how the Eagles 'tanked'.Melbourne tanked when they lost after the siren according to everyone, so this isn't really much different.
(note - Melbourne did tank - but at selection, that game the players and coach were trying to win. Eagles clearly tanked, so did Carlton many times.)
Yep and they're the only one with a rule infringement in the final minute to hand their opponent a free win.west coast and hawthorn have both been publicly accused of tanking this year now but north have not?
incredible
Take the focus off the teams that are tanking by accusing those who are not is the oldest trick in the book you will findwest coast and hawthorn have both been publicly accused of tanking this year now but north have not?
incredible