New ruck rules don’t suit his style of ruck, takes away his height advantage. Meek much better suited with his physical presence.How come Reeves hasn't been getting games?
Haven't seen him since round 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New ruck rules don’t suit his style of ruck, takes away his height advantage. Meek much better suited with his physical presence.How come Reeves hasn't been getting games?
Haven't seen him since round 2.
McKay proving everyone wrong so farNow that Mckay is going to Essendon it will be Hawthorn.
Except you it seemsWell the dons “walked the walk” and landed themselves a genuine KPD today.
Obviously McKay was impressed with the facilities on offer at the hangar which should assist the club’s cause in 2024 …
McKay proving everyone wrong so far
Ben McKay is literally 4th in total intercepts and 15th in contested marks (presuming 95% would be intercepting being a last line defender)He's been good. Still don't think he's worth the wage but that's probably just me not adjusting to the new era of big contracts.
North Melbourne is just a blackhole of development.
Ben McKay is literally 4th in total intercepts and 15th in contested marks (presuming 95% would be intercepting being a last line defender)
Think you're underselling him substantially
In my mind anyone getting paid 7 figures a year should be top 10 players in the comp. I'm talking the Judd's, Buddy's, Ablett's and Martin's etc.
Like I said my thinking is probably outdated. It's a new era of money now.
He's been good. Really tied your back 6 together anchoring the defense.
He's also on a heavily front ended contract, so will be making peanuts relative to his contemporaries when he hits his primeIn my mind anyone getting paid 7 figures a year should be top 10 players in the comp. I'm talking the Judd's, Buddy's, Ablett's and Martin's etc.
Like I said my thinking is probably outdated. It's a new era of money now.
He's been good. Really tied your back 6 together anchoring the defense.
Id prefer to overpay someone who is worth it than overpay someone who is not.In my mind anyone getting paid 7 figures a year should be top 10 players in the comp. I'm talking the Judd's, Buddy's, Ablett's and Martin's etc.
Like I said my thinking is probably outdated. It's a new era of money now.
He's been good. Really tied your back 6 together anchoring the defense.
McKay is literally in the top 10(wish) defenders in the comp. He is worth every pennyI dont think that is outdated. You dont pay the huge money for good or even for very good. Dons may have us this year, but its very easy to see it could be us next year.
add in the Merrett, Parish, Redman contracts that no doubt will be front ended and im tipping Essendon could pay a mint circa 2028 when these long term deals are paying peanuts to the lot of emHe's also on a heavily front ended contract, so will be making peanuts relative to his contemporaries when he hits his prime
He's also on a heavily front ended contract, so will be making peanuts relative to his contemporaries when he hits his prime
he was literally one of the best intercept marker in the comp in 2023 despite playing in one of the worst sides we've seen since FitzroyYou would think 26 turning 27 he would be well within the start of his prime years now.
McKay is literally in the top 10(wish) defenders in the comp. He is worth every penny
Years spent at North only count for half, so he's only 23/24 in my mindYou would think 26 turning 27 he would be well within the start of his prime years now.
would have thought it says alot. some teams have two in the top 10, some don't have anyFrom 18 teams. That really isnt saying much.
would have thought it says alot. some teams have two in the top 10, some don't have any
I can only imagine how extremely p*ssed of you get anytime you see Essendon win.This is about the most misleading poll I've seen on big footy.
You can't measure who is better based on wins over one season.
Essendon has been a basket case - in the genuine sense of that word, for a very, very long time. They've been worse than bad.
They can bank as many wins as they want in 2024, but the jury is still out on how good a club they are in 2024.
Maybe if they win a flag, and some serious humanitarian type gong they'd be in the frame.
As it stand now, aren't they just a club with more convicted criminals or drug cheating program organizers on their past senior coaching roll during the last 10-14 years, than every other club combined?
Ironically enough, they're also the only club I'm aware of to have falsely dobbed in another club for drug cheating.
If that is all correct, doesn't it kind of overshadow anything they've done on field for two odd decades by some margin?
I can only imagine how extremely p*ssed of you get anytime you see Essendon win.
I think essendon will win a few more this year so you might need to start listening to Enya or stay away from the internets.
Very salty.It's honestly just not that big of a deal for anyone watching AFL, I believe you have what's known as a relevancy complex here.
The truth is that nobody likes Essendon or really thinks they're relevant. I'm definitely not going to argue that point with you.
But then by the same token nobody is that upset watching their fuddy-duddy supporters cheering the troops on towards another rendition of 'Flying up to win the Premiership Flag'.
It's just all very difficult to take seriously in 2024.
Hawthorn board. Specifically that Essendon obsession thread.This is about the most misleading poll I've seen on big footy.
You can't measure who is better based on wins over one season.
Essendon has been a basket case - in the genuine sense of that word, for a very, very long time. They've been worse than bad.
They can bank as many wins as they want in 2024, but the jury is still out on how good a club they are in 2024.
Maybe if they win a flag, and some serious humanitarian type gong they'd be in the frame.
As it stand now, aren't they just a club with more convicted criminals or drug cheating program organizers on their past senior coaching roll during the last 10-14 years, than every other club combined?
Ironically enough, they're also the only club I'm aware of to have falsely dobbed in another club for drug cheating.
If that is all correct, doesn't it kind of overshadow anything they've done on field for two odd decades by some margin?
Very salty.
Hawthorn board. Specifically that Essendon obsession thread.
If I'm a yawn, your posts are a snoozefest.