Please pass on the entire board's thanks for her masterful trolling of that pathetic little bile-spitting goblin on the AFL.com coverage this year.
I was panning on it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Please pass on the entire board's thanks for her masterful trolling of that pathetic little bile-spitting goblin on the AFL.com coverage this year.
Ouch.
I reckon all KPF would be circling the dates they play North because with that backline I reckon at least one team will come close to putting up 200 points
View attachment 1863645
TBH I expected better from Mike Sheahan.
You're welcome.I didn’t read it once you posted “total waste of time”
I saw the headline and assumed it had to be Mark Robinson or another of the Essendon buffoons.Is Mike Sheahan serious with this s**t?
In January 2016, three judges of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, an organisation based in Europe, had determined the 34 Essendon players violated the AFL’s anti-doping policy.
Yet, in March the previous year, the AFL anti-doping Tribunal had handed down a “not guilty” judgment on all the available evidence. The World Anti-Doping Authority appealed the AFL decision to CAS and won.
How, then, did the Court of Arbitration find to the contrary? Who knows, but WADA wanted blood.
Read the ******* judgement, Mike, you senile old bat. It details why they were found guilty. Why did the AFL find them not guilty? The AFL ducking for cover on a scandal - who ever would have thought! CAS and WADA took responsibility because the AFL and ASADA were neglectful at best but outright corrupt at worst (and most likely. Thankfully CAS and WADA take their role seriously and banned the players as they should have.
Administering mysterious pharmaceuticals en masse to players off site doesn’t sound kosher, but that doesn’t mean it makes them perform beyond their natural capabilities
Seriously, Mike? Let's look at the numbers and see if Jobe's stats mysteriously spike in 2012 only to go downhill afterwards...
View attachment 1864025
Well, would you look at that. Those stats in 2012 are a bit of a spike after all. Mike goes on to mention that Jobe had to be great because he won some B&F awards in a team that wasn't making finals. Yes, Mike, because there have never, ever been average footy players who have won multiple B&F awards because they happen to be pretty consistently goodish in an average side.
Honestly I am all the dumber for reading that and am a bit worried that he's raided Tony's medicine cabinet.
Is Mike Sheahan serious with this s**t?
In January 2016, three judges of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, an organisation based in Europe, had determined the 34 Essendon players violated the AFL’s anti-doping policy.
Yet, in March the previous year, the AFL anti-doping Tribunal had handed down a “not guilty” judgment on all the available evidence. The World Anti-Doping Authority appealed the AFL decision to CAS and won.
How, then, did the Court of Arbitration find to the contrary? Who knows, but WADA wanted blood.
Read the ******* judgement, Mike, you senile old bat. It details why they were found guilty. Why did the AFL find them not guilty? The AFL ducking for cover on a scandal - who ever would have thought! CAS and WADA took responsibility because the AFL and ASADA were neglectful at best but outright corrupt at worst (and most likely. Thankfully CAS and WADA take their role seriously and banned the players as they should have.
Administering mysterious pharmaceuticals en masse to players off site doesn’t sound kosher, but that doesn’t mean it makes them perform beyond their natural capabilities
Seriously, Mike? Let's look at the numbers and see if Jobe's stats mysteriously spike in 2012 only to go downhill afterwards...
View attachment 1864025
Well, would you look at that. Those stats in 2012 are a bit of a spike after all. Mike goes on to mention that Jobe had to be great because he won some B&F awards in a team that wasn't making finals. Yes, Mike, because there have never, ever been average footy players who have won multiple B&F awards because they happen to be pretty consistently goodish in an average side.
Honestly I am all the dumber for reading that and am a bit worried that he's raided Tony's medicine cabinet.
How anyone can write that and not seeing the contradiction is amazing to me.Yet, in March the previous year, the AFL anti-doping Tribunal had handed down a “not guilty” judgment on all the available evidence. The World Anti-Doping Authority appealed the AFL decision to CAS and won.
How, then, did the Court of Arbitration find to the contrary? Who knows, but WADA wanted blood.
How anyone can write that and not seeing the contradiction is amazing to me.
Yeah, but he's still got his own so he can pat that if he ever gets lonely.Bit of a waste of mikes time writing that, Jobe will never lay his fingers on Sam Mitchell’s Brownlow ever again
It's even better that he followed it up with this sentence:How anyone can write that and not seeing the contradiction is amazing to me.
Odds are he comes back and does it again in no time and ends up missing even more time than if he had just got it done normally.Honestly, if you're McStay do you convince the surgeon to perform the synthetic graft that gets you back quicker?
It's riskier, but for the sake of finding success in his career it might be his best option.
Collingwood will be right in the window to go back to back next year. He actually gives himself a chance of possibly playing in a Premiership if he gets back as quickly as possible.
Had he played in this seasons flag it wouldn't be worth considering.
Is Mike Sheahan serious with this s**t?
In January 2016, three judges of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, an organisation based in Europe, had determined the 34 Essendon players violated the AFL’s anti-doping policy.
Yet, in March the previous year, the AFL anti-doping Tribunal had handed down a “not guilty” judgment on all the available evidence. The World Anti-Doping Authority appealed the AFL decision to CAS and won.
How, then, did the Court of Arbitration find to the contrary? Who knows, but WADA wanted blood.
Read the ******* judgement, Mike, you senile old bat. It details why they were found guilty. Why did the AFL find them not guilty? The AFL ducking for cover on a scandal - who ever would have thought! CAS and WADA took responsibility because the AFL and ASADA were neglectful at best but outright corrupt at worst (and most likely. Thankfully CAS and WADA take their role seriously and banned the players as they should have.
Administering mysterious pharmaceuticals en masse to players off site doesn’t sound kosher, but that doesn’t mean it makes them perform beyond their natural capabilities
Seriously, Mike? Let's look at the numbers and see if Jobe's stats mysteriously spike in 2012 only to go downhill afterwards...
View attachment 1864025
Well, would you look at that. Those stats in 2012 are a bit of a spike after all. Mike goes on to mention that Jobe had to be great because he won some B&F awards in a team that wasn't making finals. Yes, Mike, because there have never, ever been average footy players who have won multiple B&F awards because they happen to be pretty consistently goodish in an average side.
Honestly I am all the dumber for reading that and am a bit worried that he's raided Tony's medicine cabinet.
How anyone can write that and not seeing the contradiction is amazing to me.
You reckon there are photos?Yeah, there's either a screw lose or Robbo has got something on him.
Yeah, but he's still got his own so he can pat that if he ever gets lonely.
Thought he had to hand it back in?
Mystery of Jobe Watson's Brownlow medal solved
The whereabouts of Essendon star Jobe Watson's Brownlow medal has been a mystery ever since he renounced the award in November. Until now.www.abc.net.au
Apparently he did return it, shame it was after mitch was presented with his, they could have melted down Jobe's medal to make the medals for the non drug cheating winners
I’m glad Sammy and Cotchin don’t have any taint on their medals - instead they could melt Jobe’s down and make little ceremonial syringes to present to Robbo, Demetriou, Hird and Thompson to remind them of the pricks they are.
It's amazing isn't it?Is Mike Sheahan serious with this s**t?
In January 2016, three judges of the Court of Arbitration for Sport, an organisation based in Europe, had determined the 34 Essendon players violated the AFL’s anti-doping policy.
Yet, in March the previous year, the AFL anti-doping Tribunal had handed down a “not guilty” judgment on all the available evidence. The World Anti-Doping Authority appealed the AFL decision to CAS and won.
How, then, did the Court of Arbitration find to the contrary? Who knows, but WADA wanted blood.
Read the ******* judgement, Mike, you senile old bat. It details why they were found guilty. Why did the AFL find them not guilty? The AFL ducking for cover on a scandal - who ever would have thought! CAS and WADA took responsibility because the AFL and ASADA were neglectful at best but outright corrupt at worst (and most likely. Thankfully CAS and WADA take their role seriously and banned the players as they should have.
Administering mysterious pharmaceuticals en masse to players off site doesn’t sound kosher, but that doesn’t mean it makes them perform beyond their natural capabilities
Seriously, Mike? Let's look at the numbers and see if Jobe's stats mysteriously spike in 2012 only to go downhill afterwards...
View attachment 1864025
Well, would you look at that. Those stats in 2012 are a bit of a spike after all. Mike goes on to mention that Jobe had to be great because he won some B&F awards in a team that wasn't making finals. Yes, Mike, because there have never, ever been average footy players who have won multiple B&F awards because they happen to be pretty consistently goodish in an average side.
Honestly I am all the dumber for reading that and am a bit worried that he's raided Tony's medicine cabinet.